Suppr超能文献

公交可达性工具(TRACT):开发一种用于公共交通系统可达性的新型评分系统。

TRansit ACessibility Tool (TRACT): Developing a novel scoring system for public transportation system accessibility.

作者信息

Twardzik Erica, Schrack Jennifer A, Pollack Porter Keshia M, Coleman Taylor, Washington Kathryn, Swenor Bonnielin K

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Transp Health. 2024 Jan;34. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2023.101742. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although federal laws require equal access to public transportation for people with disabilities, access barriers persist. Lack of sharing accessibility information on public transportation websites restricts people with disabilities from making transportation plans and effectively using public transportation systems. This project aims to document information provided about public transportation systems accessibility and share this information using an open data platform.

METHODS

We reviewed the top twenty-six public transportation systems in the United States based on federal funding in fiscal year 2020. Information about accessibility was abstracted from each public transportation system website by two independent reviewers from February-March 2022. Informed by universal design principles, public transportation systems were scored across six dimensions: facility accessibility (0-22 points), vehicle accessibility (0-11 points), inclusive policies (0-12 points), rider accommodations (0-9 points), paratransit services (0-6 points), and website accessibility (0-2 points). Total scores were calculated as the sum of each dimension (0-62 points). Data and findings were publicly disseminated (https://disabilityhealth.jhu.edu/transitdashboard/).

RESULTS

The average overall accessibility information score was 31.9 (SD=6.2) out of 62 possible points. Mean scores were 8.4 (SD=2.9) for facility accessibility, 4.5 (SD=2.1) for vehicle accessibility, 7.8 (SD=1.6) for inclusive policies, 4.9 (SD=1.6) for rider accommodations, 4.5 (SD=2.0) for paratransit services, and 1.8 (SD=0.4) for website accessibility. Eleven public transportation systems (42%) received the maximum score for paratransit services and 20 (77%) received the maximum score for website accessibility. No public transportation system received the maximum score for any of the other dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a novel scoring system, we found significant variation in the accessibility information presented on public transportation system websites. Websites are a primary mode where users obtain objective information about public transportation systems and are therefore important platforms for communication. Absence of accessibility information creates barriers for the disability community and restricts equal access to public transportation.

摘要

引言

尽管联邦法律要求为残疾人提供平等的公共交通服务,但交通障碍仍然存在。公共交通网站上缺乏共享无障碍信息,这限制了残疾人制定交通计划并有效使用公共交通系统。本项目旨在记录有关公共交通系统无障碍性的信息,并使用开放数据平台共享这些信息。

方法

我们根据2020财年的联邦资金审查了美国排名前26的公共交通系统。2022年2月至3月,两名独立评审员从每个公共交通系统网站提取了有关无障碍性的信息。根据通用设计原则,公共交通系统在六个维度上进行评分:设施无障碍性(0 - 22分)、车辆无障碍性(0 - 11分)、包容性政策(0 - 12分)、乘客便利设施(0 - 9分)、辅助客运服务(0 - 6分)和网站无障碍性(0 - 2分)。总分数为各维度分数之和(0 - 62分)。数据和研究结果已公开发布(https://disabilityhealth.jhu.edu/transitdashboard/)。

结果

在可能的62分中,无障碍信息的平均总得分是31.9分(标准差 = 6.2)。设施无障碍性的平均得分为8.4分(标准差 = 2.9),车辆无障碍性为4.5分(标准差 = 2.1),包容性政策为7.8分(标准差 = 1.6),乘客便利设施为4.9分(标准差 = 1.6),辅助客运服务为4.5分(标准差 = 2.0),网站无障碍性为1.8分(标准差 = 0.4)。11个公共交通系统(42%)在辅助客运服务方面获得了最高分,20个(77%)在网站无障碍性方面获得了最高分。没有公共交通系统在其他任何维度上获得最高分。

结论

通过一种新颖的评分系统,我们发现公共交通系统网站上呈现的无障碍信息存在显著差异。网站是用户获取公共交通系统客观信息的主要方式,因此是重要的交流平台。缺乏无障碍信息给残疾人群体造成了障碍,并限制了对公共交通的平等使用。

相似文献

10
Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma.针对严重创伤成人的直升机紧急医疗服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 15;2015(12):CD009228. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009228.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to Reproductive Health Services Among People With Disabilities.残疾人获得生殖健康服务的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344877. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44877.

本文引用的文献

4
COVID-19 vaccine website accessibility dashboard.COVID-19 疫苗网站可访问性仪表板。
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jul;15(3):101325. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101325. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
8
Ramps remain a barrier to safe wheelchair user transit bus ingress/egress.坡道仍是安全让轮椅使用者进出公交车的障碍。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Aug;15(6):629-636. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1604824. Epub 2020 May 4.
10
Disability and food access and insecurity: A scoping review of the literature.残疾与食物获取及不安全状况:文献综述
Health Place. 2019 May;57:107-121. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验