Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 19;117(20):10633-10635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003627117. Epub 2020 May 4.
According to the dominant view of category representation, people preferentially infer that kinds (richly structured categories) reflect essences. Generic language ("Boys like blue") often occupies the central role in accounts of the formation of essentialist interpretations-especially in the context of social categories. In a preregistered study ( = 240 American children, ages 4 to 9 y), we tested whether children assume essences in the presence of generic language or whether they flexibly assume diverse causal structures. Children learned about a novel social category described with generic statements containing either biological properties or cultural properties. Although generic language always led children to believe that properties were nonaccidental, young children (4 or 5 y) in this sample inferred the nonaccidental structure was socialization. Older children (6 to 9 y) flexibly interpreted the category as essential or socialized depending on the type of properties that generalized. We uncovered early-emerging flexibility and no privileged link between kinds and essences.
根据范畴代表性的主流观点,人们更倾向于推断种类(结构丰富的范畴)反映本质。通用语言(“男孩喜欢蓝色”)通常在本质主义解释形成的解释中占据核心地位——尤其是在社会范畴的背景下。在一项预先注册的研究中(=240 名美国儿童,年龄 4 至 9 岁),我们测试了儿童在存在通用语言的情况下是否假定本质,或者他们是否灵活地假定不同的因果结构。儿童学习了一个用包含生物属性或文化属性的通用语句描述的新的社会范畴。尽管通用语言总是使儿童相信属性是必然的,但在这个样本中,年幼的儿童(4 或 5 岁)推断出非偶然的结构是社会化。年龄较大的儿童(6 至 9 岁)根据概括的属性类型灵活地将类别解释为本质或社会化。我们发现了早期出现的灵活性,以及种类和本质之间没有特权联系。