Steindal Simen A, Nes Andréa Aparecida Goncalves, Godskesen Tove E, Dihle Alfhild, Lind Susanne, Winger Anette, Klarare Anna
Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.
Palliative Research Centre, Department of Health Care Sciences, Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e16218. doi: 10.2196/16218.
Telehealth is increasingly being used in home care and could be one measure to support the needs of home-based patients receiving palliative care. However, no previous scoping review has mapped existing studies on the use of telehealth for patients in palliative home care.
The aim of this study was to map and assess published studies on the use of telehealth for patients in palliative home care.
A scoping review was conducted using the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Reporting was guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. A systematic and comprehensive search of Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health was performed for studies published between January 2000 and October 2018. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data.
The review included 22 papers from 19 studies. Four thematic groupings were identified among the included papers: easy and effortless use of telehealth regardless of the current health condition, visual features that enhance communication and care via telehealth, symptom management and self-management promotion by telehealth, and perceptions of improved palliative care at home.
The use of telehealth in palliative home care seems to be feasible, improving access to health care professionals at home and enhancing feelings of security and safety. The visual features of telehealth seem to allow a genuine relationship with health care professionals. However, there are contradicting results on whether the use of telehealth improves burdensome symptoms and quality of life. Future research should investigate the experiences of using telehealth among patients with life-limiting illness other than cancer and patients aged 85 years or older. More research is needed to increase the body of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of telehealth on symptoms and quality of life.
远程医疗在家庭护理中的应用日益广泛,它可能是满足接受姑息治疗的居家患者需求的一种措施。然而,此前尚无范围综述对有关远程医疗在姑息家庭护理中应用的现有研究进行梳理。
本研究旨在梳理和评估已发表的关于远程医疗在姑息家庭护理中应用的研究。
采用阿克西和奥马利的方法框架进行范围综述。报告遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)。对2000年1月至2018年10月发表的研究,在医学文献分析和检索系统在线数据库(MEDLINE)、EMBASE、PsycINFO以及护理学与健康相关学科累积索引数据库(CINAHL)中进行了系统全面的检索。两位作者独立评估纳入标准并提取数据。
该综述纳入了19项研究中的22篇论文。在所纳入的论文中确定了四个主题类别:无论当前健康状况如何,远程医疗使用起来轻松便捷;通过远程医疗增强沟通和护理的视觉特征;远程医疗进行症状管理和促进自我管理;在家中对改善姑息治疗的认知。
远程医疗在姑息家庭护理中的应用似乎是可行的,改善了在家中获得医疗保健专业人员服务的机会,并增强了安全感。远程医疗的视觉特征似乎能让患者与医疗保健专业人员建立真正的关系。然而,关于远程医疗的使用是否能改善令人困扰的症状和生活质量,存在相互矛盾的结果。未来的研究应调查除癌症患者外的患有危及生命疾病的患者以及85岁及以上老年人使用远程医疗的体验。需要更多研究来增加关于远程医疗对症状和生活质量有效性的知识体系。