Hajifathaliha Fariba, Mahboubi Arash, Mohit Elham, Bolourchian Noushin, Khalaj Vahid, Nematollahi Leila
Food Safety Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Adv Pharm Bull. 2020 Jun;10(2):290-296. doi: 10.34172/apb.2020.035. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
Poly l-lysine (PLL) has been introduced as a strengthening covering layer for alginate microcapsules which are the most convenient way for cell encapsulation. Some disadvantages of PLL such as high price and low biocompatibility have prompted scientists to find better alternatives. Linear poly ethylene imine (LPEI), thanks to its highly similar structure to PLL, could be considered as a proper cost-effective alternative. In this study LPEI and PLL were compared as covering layers of cell-loaded alginate-LPEI-alginate (cALA) and alginate-PLL-alginate (cAPA) microcapsules. In addition to the physico-mechanical properties, the encapsulation efficiency, cell survival post encapsulation, cell viability, and cellular metabolic activity within the microcapsules were evaluated using trypan blue, live/dead cell staining, and MTT test, respectively. Physico-mechanical evaluation of the microcapsules revealed that the cell microencapsulation process did not affect their shape, size, and mechanical stability. Although the encapsulation efficiency for cALA and cAPA was not different ( >0.05), cell survival post encapsulation was higher in cALA than in cAPA (<0.05) which could be the reason for the higher cell viability and also cellular metabolic activity within these microcapsules in comparison to cAPA. Here, based on these results, ALA could be introduced as a preferable alternative to APA for cell encapsulation.
聚-L-赖氨酸(PLL)已被用作藻酸盐微胶囊的强化覆盖层,藻酸盐微胶囊是细胞封装最便捷的方式。PLL存在一些缺点,如价格高昂且生物相容性低,这促使科学家寻找更好的替代品。线性聚乙烯亚胺(LPEI)由于其结构与PLL高度相似,可被视为一种合适的具有成本效益的替代品。在本研究中,对LPEI和PLL作为负载细胞的藻酸盐-LPEI-藻酸盐(cALA)和藻酸盐-PLL-藻酸盐(cAPA)微胶囊的覆盖层进行了比较。除了物理机械性能外,还分别使用台盼蓝、活/死细胞染色和MTT试验评估了微胶囊内的包封效率、封装后细胞存活率、细胞活力和细胞代谢活性。对微胶囊的物理机械评估表明,细胞微封装过程并未影响其形状、大小和机械稳定性。虽然cALA和cAPA的包封效率没有差异(>0.05),但cALA封装后的细胞存活率高于cAPA(<0.05),这可能是与cAPA相比,这些微胶囊内细胞活力和细胞代谢活性更高的原因。在此,基于这些结果,ALA可被引入作为细胞封装中优于APA的替代品。