• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较阿拉伯语决策辅助与常规护理的使用。在沙特阿拉伯对讲阿拉伯语的转移性结直肠癌患者进行的多中心随机对照试验。

Comparing the use of Arabic decision aid to usual care. A multicenter randomized controlled trial for Arabic speaking metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Saudi Arabia.

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2020 May;41(5):499-507. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.5.25064.

DOI:10.15537/smj.2020.5.25064
PMID:32373917
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7253845/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of decision aids (DAs) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in the Arabic language.

METHODS

A multi-centered randomized control trial was used to evaluate the effect of Arabic DA use with usual care for mCRC patients compared to usual care alone. Patients were recruited from 4 main oncology centers in Saudi Arabia: King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh; King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh; King Saud Medical City, Riyadh; and King Fahd Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, between March 2016 and  October 2018. The final follow up was in April 2019. The study measured patient understanding of prognosis, treatment options, and the level of the patient's anxiety.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were included in the analysis; 51 in the intervention group. A small proportion of both (DA with usual care and usual care) understood that mCRC was incurable (8% and 5%) of the 2 groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in anxiety level; however, a time effect both initially and after one month was significantly higher than at 6 month.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that a higher level of patient's baseline understanding lowered anxiety levels over time.  Decision aids group presented low levels of anxiety over time than those provided the usual care. We recommend  using Arabic DA in the oncology centers dealing with mCRC patients, aiming to empower patients in decision making.

摘要

目的

评估阿拉伯语转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者决策辅助工具(DAs)的效果。

方法

采用多中心随机对照试验,评估与常规护理相比,阿拉伯语 DA 在 mCRC 患者中的应用效果。患者于 2016 年 3 月至 2018 年 10 月期间在沙特阿拉伯的 4 个主要肿瘤中心招募:利雅得的法赫德国王医疗城、利雅得的哈立德国王大学医院、利雅得的沙特国王医疗城和达曼的法赫德国王专科医院。最终随访时间为 2019 年 4 月。研究测量了患者对预后、治疗选择的理解程度和患者焦虑水平。

结果

92 名患者纳入分析;干预组 51 名。两组中只有一小部分(DA 联合常规护理和常规护理)分别理解 mCRC 是不可治愈的(8%和 5%)。两组之间的焦虑水平没有显著差异;然而,在最初和一个月后都有显著高于 6 个月的时间效应。

结论

研究表明,较高的患者基线理解水平降低了焦虑水平。决策辅助组在整个时间内的焦虑水平低于常规护理组。我们建议在处理 mCRC 患者的肿瘤中心使用阿拉伯语 DA,旨在增强患者的决策能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/7253845/ec88377e7834/SaudiMedJ-41-499-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/7253845/3387341a1b9c/SaudiMedJ-41-499-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/7253845/ad2934ae49ac/SaudiMedJ-41-499-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/7253845/ec88377e7834/SaudiMedJ-41-499-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/7253845/3387341a1b9c/SaudiMedJ-41-499-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/7253845/ad2934ae49ac/SaudiMedJ-41-499-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d0/7253845/ec88377e7834/SaudiMedJ-41-499-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the use of Arabic decision aid to usual care. A multicenter randomized controlled trial for Arabic speaking metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Saudi Arabia.比较阿拉伯语决策辅助与常规护理的使用。在沙特阿拉伯对讲阿拉伯语的转移性结直肠癌患者进行的多中心随机对照试验。
Saudi Med J. 2020 May;41(5):499-507. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.5.25064.
2
A Trial of Favipiravir and Hydroxychloroquine combination in Adults Hospitalized with moderate and severe Covid-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估法匹拉韦和羟氯喹联合治疗中重度 COVID-19 住院成人的疗效和安全性的随机对照研究:研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 31;21(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04825-x.
3
Validity and feasibility of the Arabic version of distress thermometer for Saudi cancer patients.沙特癌症患者痛苦温度计阿拉伯文版的有效性和可行性。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0207364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207364. eCollection 2018.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
5
Social Anxiety, Social Support, and Quality of Life in Patients With Epilepsy at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级护理医院中癫痫患者的社交焦虑、社会支持与生活质量
Cureus. 2023 Sep 18;15(9):e45447. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45447. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
7
Transformation of health care and the new model of care in Saudi Arabia: Kingdom's Vision 2030.医疗保健的转型与沙特阿拉伯的新型医疗模式:王国的 2030 愿景。
J Med Life. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):347-354. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0070.
8
Randomised controlled trial of a repeated consultation support intervention for patients with colorectal cancer.随机对照试验对结直肠癌患者重复咨询支持干预的研究。
Psychooncology. 2019 Apr;28(4):702-709. doi: 10.1002/pon.4965. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
9
Feasibility of using Arabic Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to assess anxiety and depression among patients attending Accident and Emergency at a University Hospital setting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.在沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家大学医院的急诊部门,使用阿拉伯语版医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估患者焦虑和抑郁状况的可行性。
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Nov-Dec;31(6):1366-71. doi: 10.12669/pjms.316.6849.
10
Supporting treatment decision making in advanced cancer: a randomized trial of a decision aid for patients with advanced colorectal cancer considering chemotherapy.支持晚期癌症的治疗决策:一项针对考虑化疗的晚期结直肠癌患者的决策辅助工具的随机试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2077-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.0754. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment Tools to Examine Illness Understanding in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.用于评估晚期癌症患者疾病认知的评估工具:随机临床试验的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;17(3):385. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030385.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.决策辅助工具用于帮助面临医疗保健治疗或筛查决策的人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.
3
Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.

本文引用的文献

1
Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery.针对考虑压力性尿失禁手术的女性患者决策辅助工具(SUI-PDA©)的开发、验证及初步评估
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Dec;30(12):2013-2022. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
2
The role of emotions in cancer patients' decision-making.情绪在癌症患者决策中的作用。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 Mar 28;13:914. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.914. eCollection 2019.
3
Treatment Patterns Among De Novo Metastatic Cancer Patients Who Died Within 1 Month of Diagnosis.
决策辅导:帮助人们做出医疗决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013385.pub2.
4
Interventions to Improve Prognostic Understanding in Advanced Stages of Life-Limiting Illness: A Systematic Review.干预措施以改善生命终末期严重疾病患者的预后理解:系统评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Feb;63(2):e212-e223. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
诊断后1个月内死亡的初发性转移性癌症患者的治疗模式
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Jun;3(2):pkz021. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz021. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
Decision Making Criteria in Oncology.肿瘤学决策标准。
Oncology. 2020;98(6):370-378. doi: 10.1159/000492272. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一线化疗联合西妥昔单抗或贝伐单抗对KRAS野生型晚期或转移性结直肠癌患者总生存期的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2392-2401. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7105.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
7
Palliative care in cancer: managing patients' expectations.癌症姑息治疗:管理患者的期望。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2016 Dec;63(4):242-257. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.188. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
8
Are cancer-related decision aids appropriate for socially disadvantaged patients? A systematic review of US randomized controlled trials.与癌症相关的决策辅助工具对社会弱势患者是否适用?对美国随机对照试验的系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jun 6;16:64. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0303-6.
9
Discussions of Life Expectancy and Changes in Illness Understanding in Patients With Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症患者的预期寿命及疾病认知变化探讨
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2398-403. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6696. Epub 2016 May 23.
10
Usability evaluation and adaptation of the e-health Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision aid for Spanish-speaking Latino men.针对说西班牙语的拉丁裔男性的电子健康个人患者档案-前列腺决策辅助工具的可用性评估与适配
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Jul 24;15:56. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0180-4.