Crisson James E, Keefe Francis J
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710 U.S.A.
Pain. 1988 Nov;35(2):147-154. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90222-9.
Although behavioral scientists have long been interested in how an individual's locus of control relates to coping and adjustment, basic information remains to be gathered on the relevance of locus of control to adaptation to persistent pain. This study examined the relationship of locus of control orientation to pain coping strategies and psychological distress in chronic pain patients. Subjects were 62 chronic pain patients. All patients were administered: (1) the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales to assess locus of control, (2) the Coping Strategies Questionnaire to evaluate pain coping strategies, and (3) the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised to assess psychological distress. Correlational analyses revealed that patients who viewed outcomes as controlled by chance factors such as fate or luck tended to rely on maladaptive pain coping strategies and rated their abilities to control and decrease pain as poor. They also exhibited greater psychological distress. Regression analyses indicated that patients having a chance orientation toward locus of control were more likely to report depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms and to have higher overall levels of psychological distress. Chance locus of control also predicted greater reliance on diverting attention and praying/hoping in dealing with their pain. In addition, patients high on chance locus of control reported feeling helpless to deal effectively with their pain problem. Clinicians evaluating chronic pain patients need to be aware that patients who view outcomes as controlled by external factors such as chance may have deficits in pain coping strategies and may report greater psychological distress than patients who do not have this locus of control orientation.
尽管行为科学家长期以来一直对个体的控制点如何与应对和适应相关感兴趣,但关于控制点与持续疼痛适应的相关性仍有待收集基本信息。本研究考察了控制点取向与慢性疼痛患者疼痛应对策略和心理困扰之间的关系。研究对象为62名慢性疼痛患者。所有患者均接受了以下测试:(1)多维健康控制点量表以评估控制点,(2)应对策略问卷以评估疼痛应对策略,以及(3)症状自评量表修订版以评估心理困扰。相关分析显示,那些认为结果受命运或运气等偶然因素控制的患者往往依赖适应不良的疼痛应对策略,并认为自己控制和减轻疼痛的能力较差。他们还表现出更大的心理困扰。回归分析表明,具有偶然控制点取向的患者更有可能报告抑郁、焦虑和强迫症状,并且心理困扰的总体水平更高。偶然控制点还预示着在应对疼痛时更依赖转移注意力和祈祷/希望。此外,偶然控制点得分高的患者表示在有效应对疼痛问题方面感到无助。评估慢性疼痛患者的临床医生需要意识到,那些认为结果受偶然等外部因素控制的患者在疼痛应对策略方面可能存在缺陷,并且可能比没有这种控制点取向的患者报告更大的心理困扰。