• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Riemannian 分类器提高了基于机器学习的 PTSD 静息 EEG 诊断的准确性。

Riemannian classifier enhances the accuracy of machine-learning-based diagnosis of PTSD using resting EEG.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Clinical Emotion and Cognition Research Laboratory, Inje University, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 30;102:109960. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109960. Epub 2020 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109960
PMID:32376342
Abstract

Recently, objective and automated methods for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have attracted increasing attention. However, previous studies on machine-learning-based diagnosis of PTSD with resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) have reported poor accuracies of as low as 60%. Here, a Riemannian geometry-based classifier, the Fisher geodesic minimum distance to the mean (FgMDM), was employed for PTSD classification for the first time. Eyes-closed resting-state EEG data of 39 healthy individuals and 42 PTSD patients were used for the analysis. EEG source activities in 148 cortical regions were parcellated based on the Destrieux atlas, and their covariances were evaluated for each individual. Thirty epochs of preprocessed EEG were employed to calculate source activities. In addition, the FgMDM approach was applied to each EEG source covariance to construct the classifier. For a comparison, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) classifiers employing source band powers and network features as feature candidates were also tested. The FgMDM classifier showed an average classification accuracy of 75.240.80%. In contrast, the maximum accuracies of LDA, SVM, and RF classifiers were 66.54 ± 2.99%, 61.11 ± 2.98%, and 60.99 ± 2.19%, respectively. Our study demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of PTSD with resting-state EEG could be significantly improved by employing the FgMDM framework, which is a type of Riemannian geometry-based classifier.

摘要

最近,用于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)诊断的客观和自动化方法引起了越来越多的关注。然而,以前使用静息态脑电图(EEG)进行基于机器学习的 PTSD 诊断的研究报告的准确率低至 60%。在这里,首次使用基于黎曼几何的分类器——Fisher 测地线均值最小距离(FgMDM)进行 PTSD 分类。使用 39 名健康个体和 42 名 PTSD 患者的闭眼静息态 EEG 数据进行分析。根据 Destrieux 图谱将 EEG 源活动划分为 148 个皮质区域,并评估每个个体的协方差。使用 30 个预处理 EEG epochs 计算源活动。此外,还将 FgMDM 方法应用于每个 EEG 源协方差,以构建分类器。为了进行比较,还测试了采用源频带功率和网络特征作为特征候选的线性判别分析(LDA)、支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林(RF)分类器。FgMDM 分类器的平均分类准确率为 75.24±0.80%。相比之下,LDA、SVM 和 RF 分类器的最大准确率分别为 66.54±2.99%、61.11±2.98%和 60.99±2.19%。我们的研究表明,通过采用基于黎曼几何的 FgMDM 框架,静息态 EEG 对 PTSD 的诊断准确性可以显著提高,这是一种基于黎曼几何的分类器。

相似文献

1
Riemannian classifier enhances the accuracy of machine-learning-based diagnosis of PTSD using resting EEG.Riemannian 分类器提高了基于机器学习的 PTSD 静息 EEG 诊断的准确性。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 30;102:109960. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109960. Epub 2020 May 3.
2
Resting-state EEG functional connectivity predicts post-traumatic stress disorder subtypes in veterans.静息态 EEG 功能连接可预测退伍军人创伤后应激障碍亚型。
J Neural Eng. 2022 Nov 9;19(6). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac9aaf.
3
Use of machine learning in predicting clinical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression: A resting state electroencephalography study.机器学习在预测共病创伤后应激障碍和重度抑郁症患者经颅磁刺激临床反应中的应用:一项静息态脑电图研究。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 1;252:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.077. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
4
A Comprehensive Machine-Learning-Based Software Pipeline to Classify EEG Signals: A Case Study on PNES vs. Control Subjects.基于机器学习的 EEG 信号分类综合软件流水线:PNES 与对照受试者案例研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 24;20(4):1235. doi: 10.3390/s20041235.
5
Classifying post-traumatic stress disorder using the magnetoencephalographic connectome and machine learning.使用脑磁图连接组学和机器学习对创伤后应激障碍进行分类。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 3;10(1):5937. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62713-5.
6
Decoding semantic relatedness and prediction from EEG: A classification method comparison.从 EEG 解码语义相关性和预测:分类方法比较。
Neuroimage. 2023 Aug 15;277:120268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120268. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
7
Designing a robust feature extraction method based on optimum allocation and principal component analysis for epileptic EEG signal classification.基于最优分配和主成分分析的癫痫脑电信号分类稳健特征提取方法设计。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Apr;119(1):29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
8
Machine-learning-based classification between post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder using P300 features.基于 P300 特征的创伤后应激障碍与重性抑郁障碍的机器学习分类。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102001. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102001. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
9
Enhanced Performance by Interpretable Low-Frequency Electroencephalogram Oscillations in the Machine Learning-Based Diagnosis of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.基于机器学习的创伤后应激障碍诊断中可解释的低频脑电图振荡增强性能
Front Neuroinform. 2022 Apr 26;16:811756. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2022.811756. eCollection 2022.
10
Machine learning-based classification using electroencephalographic multi-paradigms between drug-naïve patients with depression and healthy controls.基于机器学习的药物初治抑郁症患者与健康对照者之间的多范式脑电图分类。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Oct 1;338:270-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Electroencephalogram-Based Prediction of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment Response Using Data Augmentation.使用数据增强技术增强基于脑电图的创伤后应激障碍治疗反应预测
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 Aug;22(8):914-920. doi: 10.30773/pi.2025.0133. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
2
Advances in Electroencephalography for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Identification: A Scoping Review.用于创伤后应激障碍识别的脑电图进展:一项范围综述
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2025 Feb 5;6:332-344. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2025.3538498. eCollection 2025.
3
The application of machine learning techniques in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器学习技术在创伤后应激障碍中的应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 9;7(1):121. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01117-5.
4
Systematic review of machine learning in PTSD studies for automated diagnosis evaluation.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)研究中用于自动诊断评估的机器学习系统评价
Npj Ment Health Res. 2023 Sep 27;2(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s44184-023-00035-w.
5
Predictions of tDCS treatment response in PTSD patients using EEG based classification.基于脑电图分类预测创伤后应激障碍患者经颅直流电刺激治疗反应
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 29;13:876036. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.876036. eCollection 2022.
6
Enhanced Performance by Interpretable Low-Frequency Electroencephalogram Oscillations in the Machine Learning-Based Diagnosis of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.基于机器学习的创伤后应激障碍诊断中可解释的低频脑电图振荡增强性能
Front Neuroinform. 2022 Apr 26;16:811756. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2022.811756. eCollection 2022.
7
Machine Learning in Healthcare.医疗保健中的机器学习
Curr Genomics. 2021 Dec 16;22(4):291-300. doi: 10.2174/1389202922666210705124359.
8
Identification of Major Psychiatric Disorders From Resting-State Electroencephalography Using a Machine Learning Approach.使用机器学习方法从静息态脑电图中识别主要精神障碍
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 18;12:707581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.707581. eCollection 2021.