Suppr超能文献

脆弱性:医学教育中医师触摸的定性研究。

Being Vulnerable: A Qualitative Inquiry of Physician Touch in Medical Education.

机构信息

M. Kelly is associate professor, Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8763-709.

L. Nixon is assistant professor, Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-6587.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2020 Dec;95(12):1893-1899. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003488.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Effective nonverbal communication is associated with empathic behavior and improved patient outcomes. Touch, as a form of nonverbal communication, is relatively unexplored in medical education. This study sought to gain in-depth insights into physicians' experiences communicating with touch and to examine how these insights could inform communication skills curricula.

METHOD

Collaborative inquiry, a form of action research, was used. Six experienced physician-educators from the University of Calgary met 8 times between 2015 and 2018 to critically reflect on their experiences of touch in clinical practice, teaching, and learning. Data comprised meeting transcripts, individual narrative accounts, and digital recordings of role-plays. Interpretative phenomenology, the study of lived experience, guided analysis.

RESULTS

Two themes were identified-touch as presence and touch as risk. Participants used touch to demonstrate presence and a shared humanity with patients, to express "being with" a patient. Risk was not associated with the physical experience of touch but, rather, with its social meaning, interpreted through gender, culture, relationships, and context. Individual experiences were open to many interpretations. Participants expressed tension between their personal experience communicating with touch to express empathy and formal curricular structures. Reflection, role-modeling, and clinical debriefs were suggested as ways to encourage situational awareness and sensitive use of touch.

CONCLUSIONS

Touch is a powerful means to communicate with patients but is highly subjective. Rather than avoiding touch for fear of misinterpretation, encouraging dialogue about its complexity could promote a more balanced understanding of touch and its potential to convey empathy and help physicians more effectively manage risk when using touch.

摘要

目的

有效的非言语沟通与同理心行为和改善患者结局有关。触摸作为一种非言语沟通形式,在医学教育中相对较少被探索。本研究旨在深入了解医生在与触摸沟通方面的经验,并探讨这些见解如何为沟通技巧课程提供信息。

方法

采用合作探究法,这是一种行动研究形式。来自卡尔加里大学的六名经验丰富的医师教育家在 2015 年至 2018 年间会面了 8 次,以批判性地反思他们在临床实践、教学和学习中触摸的经验。数据包括会议记录、个人叙述记录和角色扮演的数字录音。解释现象学,即对生活经验的研究,指导了分析。

结果

确定了两个主题——触摸即存在和触摸即风险。参与者使用触摸来表现出与患者的存在和共同人性,表达“与”患者在一起。风险与触摸的身体体验无关,而是与性别、文化、关系和背景有关的社会意义有关。个人经验可以有多种解释。参与者表达了在使用触摸表达同理心和正式课程结构之间的个人经验沟通的紧张关系。反思、榜样示范和临床汇报被认为是鼓励情景意识和敏感使用触摸的方法。

结论

触摸是与患者沟通的有力手段,但具有高度主观性。与其因担心误解而避免触摸,不如鼓励对其复杂性进行对话,以促进对触摸及其传递同理心和帮助医生在使用触摸时更有效地管理风险的潜力的更平衡理解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验