Zheng Zhanfei, Wang Zhipeng, Duan Changyuan, Zhang Yu, Wang Xiaowei, Miao Xixi, Liu Haiping
Department of Sports Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
School of Strength and Conditioning Training, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
PeerJ. 2025 Sep 1;13:e19272. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19272. eCollection 2025.
While the effects of blood-flow restriction (BFR) training on various performance outcomes have been widely studied, the combination of BFR with low-load (LL) resistance training for post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE), particularly in vertical jump performance, has not been fully explored. This study aimed to investigate whether combining BFR with LL resistance training can enhance vertical jump performance in male collegiate athletes.
Fifteen male strength trainers (mean ± standard deviation (SD): age 21.7 ± 1.4 years, body mass 77.2 ± 6.3 kg, and height 179.1 ± 5.7) with at least two years of resistance training experience participated in three experimental trials using a randomized crossover design with 72-hour intervals: (a) low-load resistance exercise at 30% one repetition maximum (1RM) back squat combined with BFR for four sets of 15 repetitions (BFR+LL); (b) low-load resistance exercise without BFR for 4 sets of 15 repetitions (LL); and (c) a control condition involving passive rest (CON). Countermovement jump (CMJ) performance , including vertical jump height (VJH), relative peak power output (RPP), force impulse (FI), and rate of force development (RFD), was assessed at baseline, immediately after, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-minutes post-protocol. Both peak and mean CMJ were measured to evaluate performance changes.
The repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant condition × time interactions ( < 0.001) for VJH, RPP, and FI. Post-hoc comparisons demonstrated that BFR+LL resulted in significant improvements in VJH, RPP, and FI at 12 minutes post-protocol relative to both the CON and LL conditions ( < 0.05). Specifically, VJH increased by 7.17% (effect size (ES) = 0.79), RPP by 2.26% (ES = 0.31), and FI by 3.21% (ES = 0.29) compared to CON at 12 minutes following the BFR+LL protocol. In contrast, a significant decline in performance ( < 0.05) was observed immediately after BFR+LL, with VJH decreasing by -9.1 ± 5.1% (ES = -1.12), RPP by -8.3 ± 4.3% (ES = -1.16), and FI by -5.0 ± 2.2% (ES = -0.44) compared to baseline. No significant changes in RFD or peak CMJ performance were observed across the three conditions ( > 0.05).
The study suggests that BFR+LL resistance training may enhance acute vertical jump performance 12 minutes post-exercise, despite an initial decline in performance immediately following the protocol.
虽然血流限制(BFR)训练对各种运动表现结果的影响已得到广泛研究,但BFR与低负荷(LL)抗阻训练相结合以增强激活后表现(PAPE),特别是在垂直跳跃表现方面,尚未得到充分探索。本研究旨在调查BFR与LL抗阻训练相结合是否能提高男性大学生运动员的垂直跳跃表现。
15名有至少两年抗阻训练经验的男性力量训练者(平均±标准差(SD):年龄21.7±1.4岁,体重77.2±6.3千克,身高179.1±(此处原文可能有误,推测是5.7厘米))参与了三项实验试验,采用随机交叉设计,间隔72小时:(a)30%的一次重复最大值(1RM)后深蹲低负荷抗阻运动结合BFR,进行4组,每组15次重复(BFR+LL);(b)不进行BFR的低负荷抗阻运动,进行4组,每组15次重复(LL);(c)涉及被动休息的对照条件(CON)。在基线、运动后即刻以及运动后3、6、9和12分钟评估反向移动跳跃(CMJ)表现,包括垂直跳跃高度(VJH)、相对峰值功率输出(RPP)、力冲量(FI)和力发展速率(RFD)。测量峰值和平均CMJ以评估表现变化。
重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)显示VJH、RPP和FI存在显著的条件×时间交互作用(<0.001)。事后比较表明,与CON和LL条件相比,BFR+LL在运动后12分钟时VJH、RPP和FI有显著改善(<0.05)。具体而言,与CON相比,在BFR+LL方案后12分钟时,VJH增加了7.17%(效应量(ES)=0.79),RPP增加了2.26%(ES =0.31),FI增加了3.21%(ES =0.29)。相比之下,在BFR+LL后即刻观察到表现显著下降(<0.05),与基线相比,VJH下降了-9.1±5.1%(ES = -1.12),RPP下降了-8.3±4.3%(ES = -1.16),FI下降了-5.0±2.2%(ES = -0.44)。在三种条件下,RFD或峰值CMJ表现均未观察到显著变化(>0.05)。
该研究表明,BFR+LL抗阻训练可能会提高运动后12分钟时的急性垂直跳跃表现,尽管在方案实施后即刻表现会出现初始下降。