Suppr超能文献

加压液体萃取与传统索氏萃取法提取迷迭香抗氧化剂的比较:产量、成分及环境影响

Comparison between Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Conventional Soxhlet Extraction for Rosemary Antioxidants, Yield, Composition, and Environmental Footprint.

作者信息

Hirondart Mathilde, Rombaut Natacha, Fabiano-Tixier Anne Sylvie, Bily Antoine, Chemat Farid

机构信息

Avignon University, INRAE, UMR408, GREEN Team Extraction, F-84000 Avignon, France.

ORTESA, LabCom Naturex-Avignon University, F-84000 Avignon, France.

出版信息

Foods. 2020 May 5;9(5):584. doi: 10.3390/foods9050584.

Abstract

Nowadays, "green analytical chemistry" challenges are to develop techniques which reduce the environmental impact not only in term of analysis but also in the sample preparation step. Within this objective, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) was investigated to determine the initial composition of key antioxidants contained in rosemary leaves: Rosmarinic acid (RA), carnosic acid (CA), and carnosol (CO). An experimental design was applied to identify an optimized PLE set of extraction parameters: A temperature of 183 °C, a pressure of 130 bar, and an extraction duration of 3 min enabled recovering rosemary antioxidants. PLE was further compared to conventional Soxhlet extraction (CSE) in term of global processing time, energy used, solvent recovery, raw material used, accuracy, reproducibility, and robustness to extract quantitatively RA, CA, and CO from rosemary leaves. A statistical comparison of the two extraction procedure (PLE and CSE) was achieved and showed no significant difference between the two procedures in terms of RA, CA, and CO extraction. To complete the study showing that the use of PLE is an advantageous alternative to CSE, the eco-footprint of the PLE process was evaluated. Results demonstrate that it is a rapid, clean, and environmentally friendly extraction technique.

摘要

如今,“绿色分析化学”面临的挑战是开发不仅在分析方面而且在样品制备步骤中都能减少环境影响的技术。在此目标下,对加压液体萃取(PLE)进行了研究,以测定迷迭香叶中关键抗氧化剂的初始成分:迷迭香酸(RA)、鼠尾草酸(CA)和鼠尾草酚(CO)。应用实验设计来确定一组优化的PLE萃取参数:183℃的温度、130巴的压力和3分钟的萃取时间能够回收迷迭香抗氧化剂。在从迷迭香叶中定量萃取RA、CA和CO方面,还就整体处理时间、能源使用、溶剂回收、原材料使用、准确性、重现性和稳健性等方面将PLE与传统索氏萃取(CSE)进行了比较。对这两种萃取方法(PLE和CSE)进行了统计比较,结果表明在RA、CA和CO萃取方面两种方法之间没有显著差异。为了完成表明使用PLE是CSE的一种有利替代方法的研究,对PLE过程的生态足迹进行了评估。结果表明它是一种快速、清洁且环保的萃取技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c7/7278715/0ec6508b06d4/foods-09-00584-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验