Suppr超能文献

分布式磁场源成像技术在局灶性癫痫患者研究中的准确性和空间特性。

Accuracy and spatial properties of distributed magnetic source imaging techniques in the investigation of focal epilepsy patients.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

IRCCS Fondazione San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Aug 1;41(11):3019-3033. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24994. Epub 2020 May 9.

Abstract

Source localization of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) is clinically useful in the presurgical workup of epilepsy patients. We aimed to compare the performance of four different distributed magnetic source imaging (dMSI) approaches: Minimum norm estimate (MNE), dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM), standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA), and coherent maximum entropy on the mean (cMEM). We also evaluated whether a simple average of maps obtained from multiple inverse solutions (Ave) can improve localization accuracy. We analyzed dMSI of 206 IEDs derived from magnetoencephalography recordings in 28 focal epilepsy patients who had a well-defined focus determined through intracranial EEG (iEEG), epileptogenic MRI lesions or surgical resection. dMSI accuracy and spatial properties were quantitatively estimated as: (a) distance from the epilepsy focus, (b) reproducibility, (c) spatial dispersion (SD), (d) map extension, and (e) effect of thresholding on map properties. Clinical performance was excellent for all methods (median distance from the focus MNE = 2.4 mm; sLORETA = 3.5 mm; cMEM = 3.5 mm; dSPM = 6.8 mm, Ave = 0 mm). Ave showed the lowest distance between the map maximum and epilepsy focus (Dmin lower than cMEM, MNE, and dSPM, p = .021, p = .008, p < .001, respectively). cMEM showed the best spatial features, with lowest SD outside the focus (SD lower than all other methods, p < .001 consistently) and high contrast between the generator and surrounding regions. The average map Ave provided the best localization accuracy, whereas cMEM exhibited the lowest amount of spurious distant activity. dMSI techniques have the potential to significantly improve identification of iEEG targets and to guide surgical planning, especially when multiple methods are combined.

摘要

癫痫患者术前评估中,发作间期癫痫样放电(IEDs)的源定位具有重要的临床应用价值。本研究旨在比较四种不同的分布式磁源成像(dMSI)方法的性能:最小范数估计(MNE)、动态统计参数映射(dSPM)、标准化低分辨率电磁层析成像(sLORETA)和基于均值的相干最大熵(cMEM)。我们还评估了从多个逆解(Ave)获得的图谱的简单平均值(Ave)是否可以提高定位准确性。我们分析了 28 例局灶性癫痫患者的脑磁图记录中的 206 个 IED 所产生的 dMSI,这些患者的致痫灶通过颅内脑电图(iEEG)、致痫性磁共振病变或手术切除已明确。通过以下六个方面来定量评估 dMSI 的准确性和空间特征:(a)距癫痫灶的距离,(b)可重复性,(c)空间分散度(SD),(d)图谱扩展,(e)阈值对图谱特征的影响。所有方法的临床性能均表现出色(MNE 距致痫灶的中位数距离为 2.4 mm;sLORETA 为 3.5 mm;cMEM 为 3.5 mm;dSPM 为 6.8 mm,Ave 为 0 mm)。Ave 显示了图谱最大值与癫痫灶之间的最短距离(Dmin 低于 cMEM、MNE 和 dSPM,p = .021,p = .008,p < .001)。cMEM 显示了最佳的空间特征,在致痫灶外具有最低的 SD(低于所有其他方法,p < .001),且发生器与周围区域之间具有较高的对比度。平均图谱 Ave 提供了最佳的定位准确性,而 cMEM 显示了最低的虚假远距离活动。dMSI 技术有可能显著提高对 iEEG 靶点的识别能力,并指导手术计划,尤其是当多种方法结合使用时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6633/7336148/c113e9923d49/HBM-41-3019-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验