Suppr超能文献

高密度电源成像在术前工作流程中的可行性:棘波数量和自动棘波检测的影响。

Feasibility of high-density electric source imaging in the presurgical workflow: Effect of number of spikes and automated spike detection.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.

Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Epilepsia Open. 2023 Sep;8(3):785-796. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12732. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Presurgical high-density electric source imaging (hdESI) of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) is only used by few epilepsy centers. One obstacle is the time-consuming workflow both for recording as well as for visual review. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of (a) an automated IED detection and (b) the number of IEDs on the accuracy of hdESI and time-effectiveness.

METHODS

In 22 patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy receiving epilepsy surgery (Engel 1) we retrospectively detected IEDs both visually and semi-automatically using the EEG analysis software Persyst in 256-channel EEGs. The amount of IEDs, the Euclidean distance between hdESI maximum and resection zone, and the operator time were compared. Additionally, we evaluated the intra-individual effect of IED quantity on the distance between hdESI maximum of all IEDs and hdESI maximum when only a reduced amount of IEDs were included.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the number of IEDs between visually versus semi-automatically marked IEDs (74 ± 56 IEDs/patient vs 116 ± 115 IEDs/patient). The detection method of the IEDs had no significant effect on the mean distances between resection zone and hdESI maximum (visual: 26.07 ± 31.12 mm vs semi-automated: 33.6 ± 34.75 mm). However, the mean time needed to review the full datasets semi-automatically was shorter by 275 ± 46 min (305 ± 72 min vs 30 ± 26 min, P < 0.001). The distance between hdESI of the full versus reduced amount of IEDs of the same patient was smaller than 1 cm when at least a mean of 33 IEDs were analyzed. There was a significantly shorter intraindividual distance between resection zone and hdESI maximum when 30 IEDs were analyzed as compared to the analysis of only 10 IEDs (P < 0.001).

SIGNIFICANCE

Semi-automatized processing and limiting the amount of IEDs analyzed (~30-40 IEDs per cluster) appear to be time-saving clinical tools to increase the practicability of hdESI in the presurgical work-up.

摘要

目的

术前高密度电源成像(hdESI)对癫痫发作间期放电(IEDs)的应用仅在少数癫痫中心进行。其原因之一是记录和视觉审查的工作流程都很耗时。因此,我们分析了(a)自动 IED 检测和(b)IED 数量对 hdESI 准确性和时间效率的影响。

方法

我们回顾性地检测了 22 名接受癫痫手术(Engel 1 级)的耐药性局灶性癫痫患者的 256 通道脑电图中的 IEDs,分别使用脑电图分析软件 Persyst 进行视觉和半自动检测。比较了 IED 的数量、hdESI 最大值与切除区之间的欧几里得距离以及操作人员的时间。此外,我们评估了个体内 IED 数量对所有 IED 的 hdESI 最大值和仅包含较少 IED 时的 hdESI 最大值之间距离的影响。

结果

与视觉标记相比,半自动标记的 IED 数量无显著差异(74±56 个/患者比 116±115 个/患者)。IED 的检测方法对切除区与 hdESI 最大值之间的平均距离没有显著影响(视觉:26.07±31.12mm比半自动:33.6±34.75mm)。然而,半自动审查完整数据集所需的平均时间减少了 275±46 分钟(305±72 分钟比 30±26 分钟,P<0.001)。当分析至少 33 个 IED 时,同一患者的全量与减量 IED 的 hdESI 之间的距离小于 1cm。与仅分析 10 个 IED 相比,分析 30 个 IED 时切除区与 hdESI 最大值之间的个体内距离明显更短(P<0.001)。

意义

半自动化处理和限制分析的 IED 数量(每个簇约 30-40 个 IED)似乎是节省时间的临床工具,可以提高 hdESI 在术前评估中的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80eb/10472417/fab9ba367ad1/EPI4-8-785-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验