Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Authoring Action, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
J Community Psychol. 2020 Aug;48(6):1811-1824. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22372. Epub 2020 May 10.
The goals of this study are: (a) to share reflections from multiple stakeholders involved in a foundation-funded community-partnered evaluation project, (b) to share information that might be useful to researchers, practitioners, and funders considering the merits of researcher/practitioner evaluation projects, and (c) to make specific suggestions for funders and researcher/practitioner teams starting an evaluation project. Three stakeholders in a small-scale research-practice partnership (RPP) reflected on the evaluation project by responding to three prompts. A researcher, community organization leader, and funder at a small foundation share specific tips for those considering a small-scale RPP. Engaging in a small-scale RPPs can be a very meaningful experience for individual researchers and smaller organizations and funders. The benefits and challenges align and differ in many ways with those encountered in larger projects.
(a) 分享参与基金会资助的社区伙伴关系评估项目的多个利益相关者的反思；(b) 分享可能对考虑研究人员/从业者评估项目的优点的研究人员、从业者和资助者有用的信息；(c) 为正在进行评估项目的资助者和研究人员/从业者团队提供具体建议。一个小型研究实践伙伴关系 (RPP) 的三个利益相关者通过回应三个提示来反思评估项目。小型基金会的研究人员、社区组织领导者和资助者分享了那些考虑小型 RPP 的人的具体建议。参与小型 RPP 对个人研究人员和较小的组织和资助者来说可能是非常有意义的体验。其收益和挑战在许多方面与大型项目所面临的收益和挑战相一致或不同。
