Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Hôpital St-François D'Assise, 45 rue Leclerc, Québec, (QC), Canada.
Implement Sci. 2013 Nov 28;8:138. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-138.
With the persistent gaps between research and practice in healthcare systems, knowledge translation (KT) has gained significance and importance. Also, in most industrialized countries, there is an increasing emphasis on managing chronic health conditions with the best available evidence. Yet, organizations aiming to improve chronic care (CC) require an adequate level of organizational readiness (OR) for KT.
The purpose of this study is to review and synthesize the existing evidence on conceptual models/frameworks of Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) in healthcare as the basis for the development of a comprehensive framework of OR for KT in the context of CC.
We conducted a systematic review of the literature on OR for KT in CC using Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Sciences (SCI and SSCI), and others. Search terms included readiness; commitment and change; preparedness; willing to change; organization and administration; and health and social services.
The search was limited to studies that had been published between the starting date of each bibliographic database (e.g., 1964 for PubMed) and November 1, 2012. Only papers that refer to a theory, a theoretical component from any framework or model on OR that were applicable to the healthcare domain were considered. We analyzed data using conceptual mapping.
Pairs of authors independently screened the published literature by reviewing their titles and abstracts. Then, the two same reviewers appraised the full text of each study independently.
Overall, we found and synthesized 10 theories, theoretical models and conceptual frameworks relevant to ORC in healthcare described in 38 publications. We identified five core concepts, namely organizational dynamics, change process, innovation readiness, institutional readiness, and personal readiness. We extracted 17 dimensions and 59 sub-dimensions related to these 5 concepts.
Our findings provide a useful overview for researchers interested in ORC and aims to create a consensus on the core theoretical components of ORC in general and of OR for KT in CC in particular. However, more work is needed to define and validate the core elements of a framework that could help to assess OR for KT in CC.
在医疗保健系统中,研究与实践之间始终存在差距,因此知识转化(KT)变得意义重大。此外,在大多数工业化国家,越来越强调利用最佳现有证据来管理慢性健康状况。然而,旨在改善慢性病护理(CC)的组织需要具备足够水平的知识转化准备度(OR)。
本研究旨在回顾和综合现有的关于医疗保健中组织变革准备度(ORC)的概念模型/框架的证据,为制定 CC 背景下的 KT 知识转化准备度综合框架奠定基础。
我们使用 Pubmed、Embase、CINAHL、PsychINFO、Web of Sciences(SCI 和 SSCI)等数据库对 CC 中 KT 的 OR 文献进行了系统回顾。检索词包括准备度、承诺和变革、准备、愿意变革、组织和管理以及卫生和社会服务。
搜索范围限于自每个书目数据库开始日期(例如,PubMed 为 1964 年)至 2012 年 11 月 1 日之间发表的研究。仅考虑提及理论、任何适用于医疗保健领域的 OR 理论框架或模型的理论组成部分的论文。我们使用概念映射分析数据。
两名作者通过审查标题和摘要,独立筛选已发表的文献。然后,两名相同的审查员独立评估每篇研究的全文。
总的来说,我们发现并综合了 10 种理论、理论模型和与医疗保健中的 ORC 相关的概念框架,这些理论、模型和框架在 38 篇出版物中有描述。我们确定了五个核心概念,即组织动态、变革过程、创新准备度、机构准备度和个人准备度。我们从这五个概念中提取了 17 个维度和 59 个子维度。
我们的研究结果为对 ORC 感兴趣的研究人员提供了有用的概述,并旨在就一般的 ORC 核心理论组成部分以及 CC 中的 KT 知识转化准备度达成共识。然而,还需要做更多的工作来定义和验证有助于评估 CC 中 KT 知识转化准备度的框架的核心要素。