• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用高斯过程模拟器对两种人类心房心肌细胞模型进行敏感性和不确定性分析。

Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Two Human Atrial Cardiac Cell Models Using Gaussian Process Emulators.

作者信息

Coveney Sam, Clayton Richard H

机构信息

Insigneo Institute for in-silico Medicine and Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2020 Apr 23;11:364. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00364. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fphys.2020.00364
PMID:32390867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7191317/
Abstract

Biophysically detailed cardiac cell models reconstruct the action potential and calcium dynamics of cardiac myocytes. They aim to capture the biophysics of current flow through ion channels, pumps, and exchangers in the cell membrane, and are highly detailed. However, the relationship between model parameters and model outputs is difficult to establish because the models are both complex and non-linear. The consequences of uncertainty and variability in model parameters are therefore difficult to determine without undertaking large numbers of model evaluations. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate how sensitivity and uncertainty analysis using Gaussian process emulators can be used for a systematic and quantitive analysis of biophysically detailed cardiac cell models. We selected the Courtemanche and Maleckar models of the human atrial action potential for analysis because these models describe a similar set of currents, with different formulations. In our approach Gaussian processes emulate the main features of the action potential and calcium transient. The emulators were trained with a set of design data comprising samples from parameter space and corresponding model outputs, initially obtained from 300 model evaluations. Variance based sensitivity indices were calculated using the emulators, and first order and total effect indices were calculated for each combination of parameter and output. The differences between the first order and total effect indices indicated that the effect of interactions between parameters was small. A second set of emulators were then trained using a new set of design data with a subset of the model parameters with a sensitivity index of more than 0.1 (10%). This second stage analysis enabled comparison of mechanisms in the two models. The second stage sensitivity indices enabled the relationship between the L-type current and the action potential plateau to be quantified in each model. Our quantitative analysis predicted that changes in maximum conductance of the ultra-rapid channel would have opposite effects on action potential duration in the two models, and this prediction was confirmed by additional simulations. This study has demonstrated that Gaussian process emulators are an effective tool for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of biophysically detailed cardiac cell models.

摘要

生物物理详细的心脏细胞模型重建了心肌细胞的动作电位和钙动力学。它们旨在捕捉电流通过细胞膜中的离子通道、泵和交换器的生物物理学,并且非常详细。然而,由于模型既复杂又非线性,因此难以建立模型参数与模型输出之间的关系。因此,如果不进行大量的模型评估,就很难确定模型参数不确定性和变异性的后果。本研究的目的是证明如何使用高斯过程模拟器进行敏感性和不确定性分析,以对生物物理详细的心脏细胞模型进行系统和定量分析。我们选择了人类心房动作电位的Courtemanche和Maleckar模型进行分析,因为这些模型描述了一组相似的电流,但公式不同。在我们的方法中,高斯过程模拟了动作电位和钙瞬变的主要特征。模拟器使用一组设计数据进行训练,该数据包括来自参数空间的样本和相应的模型输出,最初从300次模型评估中获得。使用模拟器计算基于方差的敏感性指数,并针对参数和输出的每种组合计算一阶和总效应指数。一阶和总效应指数之间的差异表明参数之间相互作用的影响很小。然后使用一组新的设计数据对第二组模拟器进行训练,该数据包含敏感性指数大于0.1(10%)的模型参数子集。第二阶段分析能够比较两个模型中的机制。第二阶段敏感性指数能够量化每个模型中L型电流与动作电位平台期之间的关系。我们的定量分析预测,超快速通道最大电导的变化将对两个模型中的动作电位持续时间产生相反的影响,并且这一预测通过额外的模拟得到了证实。这项研究表明,高斯过程模拟器是对生物物理详细的心脏细胞模型进行敏感性和不确定性分析的有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/acb4ceffd1e6/fphys-11-00364-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/dadedb02844d/fphys-11-00364-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/ce44b8963d99/fphys-11-00364-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/8727a8af8333/fphys-11-00364-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/0ea142c6e605/fphys-11-00364-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/37f502af0a0a/fphys-11-00364-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/ca18fd907d31/fphys-11-00364-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/a79c94655c1d/fphys-11-00364-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/15dae845ed29/fphys-11-00364-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/9925545a392b/fphys-11-00364-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/de2ab62cd42f/fphys-11-00364-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/d41984a226c5/fphys-11-00364-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/acb4ceffd1e6/fphys-11-00364-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/dadedb02844d/fphys-11-00364-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/ce44b8963d99/fphys-11-00364-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/8727a8af8333/fphys-11-00364-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/0ea142c6e605/fphys-11-00364-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/37f502af0a0a/fphys-11-00364-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/ca18fd907d31/fphys-11-00364-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/a79c94655c1d/fphys-11-00364-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/15dae845ed29/fphys-11-00364-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/9925545a392b/fphys-11-00364-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/de2ab62cd42f/fphys-11-00364-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/d41984a226c5/fphys-11-00364-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bc8/7191317/acb4ceffd1e6/fphys-11-00364-g0012.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Two Human Atrial Cardiac Cell Models Using Gaussian Process Emulators.使用高斯过程模拟器对两种人类心房心肌细胞模型进行敏感性和不确定性分析。
Front Physiol. 2020 Apr 23;11:364. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00364. eCollection 2020.
2
Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis of a Cardiac Cell Model Using a Gaussian Process Emulator.使用高斯过程模拟器对心脏细胞模型进行贝叶斯敏感性分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 26;10(6):e0130252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130252. eCollection 2015.
3
Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a 1D vascular model with Gaussian process emulators.基于高斯过程模拟器的一维血管模型的贝叶斯敏感性分析。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2017 Dec;33(12). doi: 10.1002/cnm.2882. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
Fitting two human atrial cell models to experimental data using Bayesian history matching.基于贝叶斯历史匹配的方法拟合两种人心房细胞模型与实验数据。
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2018 Nov;139:43-58. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
5
Bayesian Calibration of Electrophysiology Models Using Restitution Curve Emulators.使用恢复曲线模拟器对电生理模型进行贝叶斯校准。
Front Physiol. 2021 Jul 22;12:693015. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.693015. eCollection 2021.
6
Data-Driven Uncertainty Quantification for Cardiac Electrophysiological Models: Impact of Physiological Variability on Action Potential and Spiral Wave Dynamics.心脏电生理模型的数据驱动不确定性量化:生理变异性对动作电位和螺旋波动力学的影响。
Front Physiol. 2020 Nov 19;11:585400. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.585400. eCollection 2020.
7
Evaluating Parameter Uncertainty in a Simulation Model of Cancer Using Emulators.利用仿真模型估算癌症模拟中的参数不确定性。
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):405-413. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19837631. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Cell to whole organ global sensitivity analysis on a four-chamber heart electromechanics model using Gaussian processes emulators.基于高斯过程仿真器的四腔心脏机电模型的细胞到整体器官全局灵敏度分析。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jun 26;19(6):e1011257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011257. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Variability in high-throughput ion-channel screening data and consequences for cardiac safety assessment.高通量离子通道筛选数据的变异性及其对心脏安全性评估的影响。
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2013 Jul-Aug;68(1):112-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Dominant ionic currents in rabbit ventricular action potential dynamics.兔心室动作电位动力学中的主要离子电流。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 30;20(7):e0328261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328261. eCollection 2025.
2
Cell to whole organ global sensitivity analysis on a four-chamber heart electromechanics model using Gaussian processes emulators.基于高斯过程仿真器的四腔心脏机电模型的细胞到整体器官全局灵敏度分析。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jun 26;19(6):e1011257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011257. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
How synergy between mechanistic and statistical models is impacting research in atrial fibrillation.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Cardiac Action Potential Models.心脏动作电位模型的综合不确定性量化与敏感性分析
Front Physiol. 2019 Jun 26;10:721. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00721. eCollection 2019.
2
Slow Recovery of Excitability Increases Ventricular Fibrillation Risk as Identified by Emulation.模拟研究表明,兴奋性恢复缓慢会增加心室颤动风险。
Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1114. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01114. eCollection 2018.
3
Fitting two human atrial cell models to experimental data using Bayesian history matching.
机械模型与统计模型之间的协同作用如何影响心房颤动的研究。
Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 30;13:957604. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.957604. eCollection 2022.
4
Determining Clinically-Viable Biomarkers for Ischaemic Stroke Through a Mechanistic and Machine Learning Approach.通过机制和机器学习方法确定缺血性脑卒中的临床可行生物标志物。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2022 Jun;50(6):740-750. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-02956-7. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
5
Bayesian Calibration of Electrophysiology Models Using Restitution Curve Emulators.使用恢复曲线模拟器对电生理模型进行贝叶斯校准。
Front Physiol. 2021 Jul 22;12:693015. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.693015. eCollection 2021.
6
Data integration for the numerical simulation of cardiac electrophysiology.心脏电生理学数值模拟的数据集成。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Apr;44(4):726-736. doi: 10.1111/pace.14198. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Mechanisms underlying pro-arrhythmic abnormalities arising from Pitx2-induced electrical remodelling: an in silico intersubject variability study.Pitx2诱导的电重构引起的致心律失常异常的潜在机制:一项计算机模拟的个体间变异性研究
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):106. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5660.
基于贝叶斯历史匹配的方法拟合两种人心房细胞模型与实验数据。
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2018 Nov;139:43-58. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
4
Sinusoidal voltage protocols for rapid characterisation of ion channel kinetics.用于快速表征离子通道动力学的正弦波电压方案。
J Physiol. 2018 May 15;596(10):1813-1828. doi: 10.1113/JP275733. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
5
Quantifying the effect of uncertainty in input parameters in a simplified bidomain model of partial thickness ischaemia.量化部分厚度缺血简化双域模型中输入参数不确定性的影响。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018 May;56(5):761-780. doi: 10.1007/s11517-017-1714-y. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
6
Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a 1D vascular model with Gaussian process emulators.基于高斯过程模拟器的一维血管模型的贝叶斯敏感性分析。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2017 Dec;33(12). doi: 10.1002/cnm.2882. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Atrial Heterogeneity Generates Re-entrant Substrate during Atrial Fibrillation and Anti-arrhythmic Drug Action: Mechanistic Insights from Canine Atrial Models.心房异质性在房颤及抗心律失常药物作用过程中产生折返基质:来自犬心房模型的机制性见解
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Dec 16;12(12):e1005245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005245. eCollection 2016 Dec.
8
Uncertainty and variability in computational and mathematical models of cardiac physiology.心脏生理学计算和数学模型中的不确定性与变异性。
J Physiol. 2016 Dec 1;594(23):6833-6847. doi: 10.1113/JP271671. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
9
Variability in cardiac electrophysiology: Using experimentally-calibrated populations of models to move beyond the single virtual physiological human paradigm.心脏电生理学的变异性:使用经过实验校准的模型群体超越单一虚拟生理人类范式。
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016 Jan;120(1-3):115-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
10
Uncertainty and variability in models of the cardiac action potential: Can we build trustworthy models?心脏动作电位模型中的不确定性和变异性:我们能否构建可靠的模型?
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016 Jul;96:49-62. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Dec 2.