Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Department of Biology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Jul;4(7):903-910. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1193-7. Epub 2020 May 11.
Cities are fully functioning ecosystems and are home to no-analogue communities of species that interact with each other and which are subject to novel urban stressors. As such, biodiversity can evolve in response to these new urban conditions, making urban species a moving target for conservation and management efforts. An evolving urban biodiversity necessitates integrating evolutionary insights into management for these efforts to be successful in a dynamic urban milieu. Here we present a framework for categorizing urban biodiversity from a management perspective. We then discuss a suite of example management tools and their potential evolutionary implications-both their opportunities for and potential consequence to management. Urban ecosystems are proliferating but, far from being ecological lost causes, they may provide unique insights and opportunities for biodiversity conservation. Determining how to achieve urban biodiversity priorities while managing pest species requires evolutionary thinking.
城市是功能完备的生态系统,是没有类似物的物种群落的家园,这些物种相互作用,并受到新的城市压力源的影响。因此,生物多样性可以进化以适应这些新的城市条件,使城市物种成为保护和管理工作的移动目标。不断变化的城市生物多样性需要将进化的见解纳入管理,以使这些努力在动态的城市环境中取得成功。在这里,我们从管理的角度提出了一个分类城市生物多样性的框架。然后,我们讨论了一系列管理工具及其潜在的进化意义,包括它们对管理的机会和潜在的后果。城市生态系统正在蓬勃发展,但它们远非生态上的失败,它们可能为生物多样性保护提供独特的见解和机会。在管理害虫物种的同时确定如何实现城市生物多样性的优先事项,需要进行进化思考。