• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与拒绝参与儿科肿瘤学下一代测序研究相关的因素

Factors Associated with Declining to Participate in a Pediatric Oncology Next Generation Sequencing Study.

作者信息

Howard Sharp Katianne M, Jurbergs Niki, Ouma Annastasia, Harrison Lynn, Gerhardt Elsie, Taylor Leslie, Hamilton Kayla, McGee Rose B, Nuccio Regina, Quinn Emily, Hines-Dowell Stacy, Kesserwan Chimene, Sunkara Anusha, Gattuso Jami S, Pritchard Michelle, Mandrell Belinda, Relling Mary V, Haidar Cyrine E, Kang Guolian, Johnson Liza M, Nichols Kim E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.

Division of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis TN, 38105.

出版信息

JCO Precis Oncol. 2020;4:202-211. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00213. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1200/PO.19.00213
PMID:32395682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7213582/
Abstract

PURPOSE

For the advances of pediatric oncology next generation sequencing (NGS) research to equitably benefit all children, a diverse and representative sample of participants is needed. However, little is known about demographic and clinical characteristics that differentiate families who decline enrollment in pediatric oncology NGS research.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively extracted for 363 pediatric oncology patients (0-21 years) approached for enrollment on Genomes for Kids (G4K), a study examining the feasibility of comprehensive clinical genomic analysis of tumors and paired normal samples. Demographic and clinical factors that significantly differentiated which families declined were subsequently compared to enrollment in Clinical Implementation of Pharmacogenetics (PG4KDS) for 348 families, a pharmacogenomics study with more explicit therapeutic benefit examining genes affecting drug responses and metabolism.

RESULTS

Fifty-three (14.6%) families declined enrollment in G4K. Race/ethnicity was the only variable that significantly differentiated study refusal using multivariate logistic regression, with families of black children more likely to decline enrollment compared to families of non-Hispanic or Hispanic white children. Reasons for declining G4K were generally consistent with other pediatric genomics research, with feeling overwhelmed and insurance discrimination fears most frequently cited. Families of black children were also more likely to decline enrollment in PG4KDS. Thirteen (3.7%) of the 348 families approached for both studies declined PG4KDS.

CONCLUSION

Race/ethnicity differentiated study declination across two different pediatric oncology genomics studies, suggesting enrollment disparities in the context of pediatric oncology genomics research. Genomics research participant samples that do not fully represent racial and ethnic minorities risk further exacerbating health disparities. Additional work is needed to understand the nuances of parental decision making in genomic research and facilitate enrollment of diverse patient populations.

摘要

目的

为使儿科肿瘤学下一代测序(NGS)研究的进展公平地惠及所有儿童,需要多样化且具有代表性的参与者样本。然而,对于那些拒绝参与儿科肿瘤学NGS研究的家庭,其人口统计学和临床特征知之甚少。

方法

回顾性提取了363名儿科肿瘤患者(0至21岁)的人口统计学和临床数据,这些患者被邀请参与“儿童基因组计划”(G4K),该研究旨在探讨对肿瘤及配对正常样本进行全面临床基因组分析的可行性。随后,将显著区分哪些家庭拒绝参与的人口统计学和临床因素,与348个家庭参与“药物基因组学临床应用研究”(PG4KDS)的情况进行比较,PG4KDS是一项药物基因组学研究,具有更明确的治疗益处,研究影响药物反应和代谢的基因。

结果

53个(14.6%)家庭拒绝参与G4K。种族/族裔是使用多变量逻辑回归显著区分拒绝参与研究的唯一变量,与非西班牙裔或西班牙裔白人儿童的家庭相比,黑人儿童的家庭更有可能拒绝参与。拒绝参与G4K的原因通常与其他儿科基因组学研究一致,最常提及的是感到不知所措和担心保险歧视。黑人儿童的家庭也更有可能拒绝参与PG4KDS。在两项研究都被邀请参与的348个家庭中,有13个(3.7%)家庭拒绝参与PG4KDS。

结论

种族/族裔在两项不同的儿科肿瘤学基因组学研究中区分了拒绝参与的情况,这表明在儿科肿瘤学基因组学研究中存在参与差异。不能充分代表种族和族裔少数群体的基因组学研究参与者样本,有可能进一步加剧健康差距。需要开展更多工作来了解父母在基因组研究中决策的细微差别,并促进不同患者群体的参与。

相似文献

1
Factors Associated with Declining to Participate in a Pediatric Oncology Next Generation Sequencing Study.与拒绝参与儿科肿瘤学下一代测序研究相关的因素
JCO Precis Oncol. 2020;4:202-211. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00213. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
2
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Parental Refusal of Consent in a Large, Multisite Pediatric Critical Care Clinical Trial.一项大型多中心儿科重症监护临床试验中家长拒绝同意的种族和族裔差异
J Pediatr. 2017 May;184:204-208.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
Parental Factors Associated With the Decision to Participate in a Neonatal Clinical Trial.与参与新生儿临床试验的决策相关的父母因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2032106. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32106.
4
Assessing Diversity in Newborn Genomic Sequencing Research Recruitment: Race/Ethnicity and Primary Spoken Language Variation in Eligibility, Enrollment, and Reasons for Declining.评估新生儿基因组测序研究招募中的多样性:在资格、入组以及拒绝原因方面,种族/民族和主要口语语言的差异。
Clin Ther. 2023 Aug;45(8):736-744. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.014. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
5
Reduction in racial and ethnic disparities after enrollment in the State Children's Health Insurance Program.加入州儿童健康保险计划后种族和族裔差异的减少。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e697-705. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1726.
6
Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project.父母对新生儿基因组测序的兴趣:来自 BabySeq 项目的入组经验。
Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):622-630. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0105-6. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
7
Obtaining informed consent for clinical tumor and germline exome sequencing of newly diagnosed childhood cancer patients.获得新诊断儿童癌症患者临床肿瘤和种系外显子组测序的知情同意书。
Genome Med. 2014 Sep 17;6(9):69. doi: 10.1186/s13073-014-0069-3. eCollection 2014.
8
Racial and ethnic disparities in communication study enrollment for young people with cancer: A descriptive analysis of the literature.癌症青少年在传播学专业招生方面的种族和民族差异:文献的描述性分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2067-2073. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.016. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
9
Toward representative genomic research: the children's rare disease cohorts experience.迈向具有代表性的基因组研究:儿童罕见病队列研究经验
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2023 Aug 22;4:26330040231181406. doi: 10.1177/26330040231181406. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Participation in pediatric oncology research protocols: Racial/ethnic, language and age-based disparities.参与儿科肿瘤学研究方案:基于种族/民族、语言和年龄的差异。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Aug;62(8):1337-44. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25472. Epub 2015 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Parent and patient knowledge and attitudes about cancer predisposition syndrome genetic testing in pediatric oncology: Understanding sociodemographic and parent-child differences.儿科肿瘤中关于癌症易感性综合征遗传检测的家长和患者的知识和态度:了解社会人口学和亲子差异。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Sep;7(9):e2119. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2119.
2
Narrative review on ethical and psychological issues raised by genetic and genomic testing in pediatric oncology care.关于儿科肿瘤护理中基因和基因组检测引发的伦理与心理问题的叙述性综述。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1955. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1955. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
3
Family Recall of and Response to Germline Pathologic Variants Found on Paired Tumor-Germline Sequencing in Pediatric Oncology.儿科肿瘤中基于配对肿瘤-胚系测序的胚系病理性变异的家族回忆和反应。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Mar;8:e2300539. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00539.
4
Publics' knowledge of, attitude to and motivation towards health-related genomics: a scoping review.公众对健康相关基因组学的知识、态度和动机:范围综述。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jul;32(7):747-758. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01547-5. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
5
Parental Understanding of Their Child's Germline Genomic Testing: Intent of Disclosure to Their Child and Family.父母对其子女种系基因组检测的理解:向子女及家人披露检测结果的意图。
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 28;13(12):1656. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121656.
6
Parents' expectations, preferences, and recall of germline findings in a childhood cancer precision medicine trial.父母对儿童癌症精准医学试验中种系研究结果的期望、偏好和回忆。
Cancer. 2023 Nov 15;129(22):3620-3632. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34917. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
Parental Views of Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation: Systematic Review.家长对参与研究的促进因素和障碍的看法:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2023 Jan 1;151(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058067.
8
Toward a More Just System of Care in Molecular Pathology.迈向更公正的分子病理学医疗体系。
Milbank Q. 2022 Dec;100(4):1192-1242. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12587. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
Parental Preferences Surrounding Timing and Content of Consent Conversations for Clinical Germline Genetic Testing Following a Child's New Cancer Diagnosis.父母对儿童新发癌症诊断后临床种系遗传检测的同意谈话时间和内容的偏好。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Oct;6:e2200323. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00323.
10
Genomes for Kids: The Scope of Pathogenic Mutations in Pediatric Cancer Revealed by Comprehensive DNA and RNA Sequencing.儿童基因组计划:全面 DNA 和 RNA 测序揭示儿科癌症中的致病性突变范围。
Cancer Discov. 2021 Dec 1;11(12):3008-3027. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1631.

本文引用的文献

1
Precision Medicine Across the Cancer Continuum: Implementation and Implications for Cancer Disparities.癌症全程精准医疗:实施情况及其对癌症差异的影响
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Nov;1:1-5. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00102.
2
Parental Perspectives on Whole Exome Sequencing in Pediatric Cancer: A Typology of Perceived Utility.父母对儿童癌症全外显子组测序的看法:感知效用的类型学
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;1. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00010. Epub 2017 May 31.
3
Speaking genomics to parents offered germline testing for cancer predisposition: Use of a 2-visit consent model.向父母讲解基因组学,为其提供癌症易感性的种系检测:使用两访同意模式。
Cancer. 2019 Jul 15;125(14):2455-2464. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32071. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
4
Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research.超越同意:在精准医学研究中与不同人群建立信任关系。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Apr;18(4):3-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322.
5
Trust, Precision Medicine Research, and Equitable Participation of Underserved Populations.信任、精准医学研究与弱势群体的公平参与。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Apr;18(4):34-36. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431328.
6
Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.患者拒绝基因组测序研究的原因:CSER联盟的经验
J Genet Couns. 2018 Sep;27(5):1220-1227. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0243-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
7
Predictors of BRCA1/2 genetic testing among Black women with breast cancer: a population-based study.黑人乳腺癌女性中BRCA1/2基因检测的预测因素:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Med. 2017 Jul;6(7):1787-1798. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1120. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Large, Prospective Analysis of the Reasons Patients Do Not Pursue BRCA Genetic Testing Following Genetic Counseling.对基因咨询后患者不进行BRCA基因检测原因的大型前瞻性分析。
J Genet Couns. 2017 Aug;26(4):859-865. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0064-5. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
9
Implementing Precision Medicine: The Ethical Challenges.实施精准医学:伦理挑战。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Jan;38(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
10
Population-Based Precision Cancer Screening: A Symposium on Evidence, Epidemiology, and Next Steps.基于人群的精准癌症筛查:证据、流行病学及后续步骤研讨会
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Nov;25(11):1449-1455. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0555. Epub 2016 Aug 9.