Vuong Diem, Bogowicz Marta, Denzler Sarah, Oliveira Carol, Foerster Robert, Amstutz Florian, Gabryś Hubert S, Unkelbach Jan, Hillinger Sven, Thierstein Sandra, Xyrafas Alexandros, Peters Solange, Pless Miklos, Guckenberger Matthias, Tanadini-Lang Stephanie
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Oncology, Cancer Center of Southeastern Ontario, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Med Phys. 2020 Sep;47(9):4045-4053. doi: 10.1002/mp.14224. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Radiomics is a promising tool for the identification of new prognostic biomarkers. Radiomic features can be affected by different scanning protocols, often present in retrospective and prospective clinical data. We compared a computed tomography (CT) radiomics model based on a large but highly heterogeneous multicentric image dataset with robust feature pre-selection to a model based on a smaller but standardized image dataset without pre-selection.
Primary tumor radiomics was extracted from pre-treatment CTs of IIIA/N2/IIIB NSCLC patients from a prospective Swiss multicentric randomized trial (n = 124, n = 14, SAKK 16/00) and a validation dataset (n = 31, n = 1). Four robustness studies investigating inter-observer delineation variation, motion, convolution kernel, and contrast were conducted to identify robust features using an intraclass correlation coefficient threshold >0.9. Two 12-months overall survival (OS) logistic regression models were trained: (a) on the entire multicentric heterogeneous dataset but with robust feature pre-selection (MCR) and (b) on a smaller standardized subset using all features (STD). Both models were validated on the validation dataset acquired with similar reconstruction parameters as the STD dataset. The model performances were compared using the DeLong test.
In total, 113 stable features were identified (n = 8, n = 0, n = 7, n = 98). The convolution kernel had the strongest influence on the feature robustness (<20% stable features). The final models of MCR and STD consisted of one and two features respectively. Both features of the STD model were identified as non-robust. MCR did not show performance significantly different from STD on the validation cohort (AUC [95%CI] = 0.72 [0.48-0.95] and 0.79 [0.63-0.95], p = 0.59).
Prognostic OS CT radiomics model for NSCLC based on a heterogeneous multicentric imaging dataset with robust feature pre-selection performed equally well as a model on a standardized dataset.
放射组学是一种很有前景的识别新的预后生物标志物的工具。放射组学特征可能会受到不同扫描协议的影响,这在回顾性和前瞻性临床数据中经常出现。我们将基于一个大型但高度异质性的多中心图像数据集并经过稳健特征预选择的计算机断层扫描(CT)放射组学模型与基于一个较小但标准化的未进行预选择的图像数据集的模型进行了比较。
从一项瑞士前瞻性多中心随机试验(n = 124,n = 14,SAKK 16/00)和一个验证数据集(n = 31,n = 1)的IIIA/N2/IIIB期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的治疗前CT中提取原发肿瘤放射组学特征。进行了四项稳健性研究,调查观察者间勾画差异、运动、卷积核和对比度,以使用类内相关系数阈值>0.9来识别稳健特征。训练了两个12个月总生存(OS)逻辑回归模型:(a)基于整个多中心异质性数据集但进行了稳健特征预选择(MCR),以及(b)基于一个较小的标准化子集使用所有特征(STD)。两个模型都在与STD数据集具有相似重建参数的验证数据集上进行了验证。使用德龙检验比较模型性能。
总共识别出113个稳定特征(n = 8,n = 0,n = 7,n = 98)。卷积核对特征稳健性的影响最强(稳定特征<20%)。MCR和STD的最终模型分别由一个和两个特征组成。STD模型的两个特征均被确定为不稳健。MCR在验证队列上的表现与STD没有显著差异(AUC [95%CI] = 0.72 [0.48 - 0.95] 和0.79 [0.63 - 0.95],p = 0.59)。
基于具有稳健特征预选择的异质性多中心成像数据集的NSCLC预后OS CT放射组学模型与基于标准化数据集的模型表现同样良好。