• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构化健康干预措施在卡车司机(SHIFT)中的群组随机对照试验:混合方法的过程评估。

The structured health intervention for truckers (SHIFT) cluster randomised controlled trial: a mixed methods process evaluation.

机构信息

School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK.

NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Jul 7;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01316-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-022-01316-x
PMID:35799298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9261004/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper presents the mixed methods process evaluation of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the Structured Health Intervention For Truckers (SHIFT), a multi-component intervention targeting physical activity and positive lifestyle behaviours in a cohort of 382 truck drivers in the UK. The SHIFT RCT found a significant difference in daily steps between intervention and control groups at 6-months in favour of the intervention participants.

METHODS

SHIFT was evaluated within a cluster-RCT and involved 25 transport sites (12 intervention and 13 control sites). Intervention components included an education session, Fitbit, text messages, and cab workout equipment. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline and 6-months follow-up. Semi-structured focus groups/interviews were conducted with drivers (n = 19) and managers (n = 18) from each site, after completion of the final follow-up health assessment (16-18 months post-randomisation). Questionnaires and interviews collected information on fidelity, dose, context, implementation, barriers, sustainability, and contamination.

RESULTS

Questionnaire and interview data from intervention participants indicated favourable attitudes towards SHIFT, specifically towards the Fitbit with a high proportion of drivers reporting regularly using it (89.1%). 79.2% of intervention participants attended the education session, which was deemed useful for facilitating improvements in knowledge and behaviour change, dietary changes were predominantly recalled. Despite not being part of the intervention, participants reported that feedback from the health assessments motivated them to change aspects of their lifestyle (intervention = 91.1%, control = 67.5%). The cab workout equipment was used less and spoken unfavourably of in the interviews. The main barriers to a healthy lifestyle at work were reported as long hours and irregular shift patterns. The most suggested improvement for the intervention was more frequent contact with drivers. Managers were positive about the objectives of SHIFT, however almost all mentioned the challenges related to implementation, specifically in smaller sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, SHIFT was predominantly implemented as intended, with minimal discrepancies seen between the delivery and protocol. Having said this, transport sites each have distinct characteristics, which may require adaptations to individual settings to encourage participation. Managers and drivers reported enthusiasm and necessity for SHIFT to be included in future Certificate of Professional Competence training.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN10483894 (date registered: 01/03/2017).

摘要

背景

本文介绍了针对英国 382 名卡车司机队列的多组分干预措施——结构化健康干预卡车司机(SHIFT)的随机对照试验(RCT)的混合方法过程评估。SHIFT RCT 发现在 6 个月时,干预组与对照组之间的每日步数有显著差异,干预组更有利。

方法

SHIFT 在一项集群 RCT 中进行评估,涉及 25 个运输站点(12 个干预站点和 13 个对照站点)。干预措施包括教育课程、Fitbit、短信和驾驶室锻炼设备。参与者在基线和 6 个月随访时完成问卷。在完成最后一次随访健康评估(随机分组后 16-18 个月)后,对每个站点的司机(n=19)和经理(n=18)进行了半结构化焦点小组/访谈。问卷和访谈收集了有关保真度、剂量、背景、实施、障碍、可持续性和污染的信息。

结果

干预参与者的问卷和访谈数据表明,他们对 SHIFT 的态度非常有利,特别是对 Fitbit 的评价很高,有很高比例的司机表示经常使用它(89.1%)。79.2%的干预参与者参加了教育课程,他们认为这有助于促进知识和行为改变,饮食改变也主要被回忆起来。尽管不属于干预措施的一部分,但参与者报告说健康评估的反馈激励他们改变生活方式的某些方面(干预组为 91.1%,对照组为 67.5%)。驾驶室锻炼设备的使用频率较低,在访谈中也被评价不佳。工作中健康生活方式的主要障碍是长时间工作和不规律的轮班模式。对干预措施的最大改进建议是更频繁地与司机接触。经理们对 SHIFT 的目标持积极态度,但几乎所有人都提到了与实施相关的挑战,特别是在较小的站点。

结论

总体而言,SHIFT 主要按照预期实施,交付和方案之间几乎没有差异。话虽如此,每个运输站点都有独特的特点,这可能需要根据个别情况进行调整,以鼓励参与。经理和司机报告说,SHIFT 需要纳入未来的专业能力证书培训,他们对此感到热情和必要。

试验注册

ISRCTN8252034(注册日期:2017 年 3 月 1 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/9261004/31f74e75c018/12966_2022_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/9261004/69106e3c710c/12966_2022_1316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/9261004/31f74e75c018/12966_2022_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/9261004/69106e3c710c/12966_2022_1316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12d2/9261004/31f74e75c018/12966_2022_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The structured health intervention for truckers (SHIFT) cluster randomised controlled trial: a mixed methods process evaluation.结构化健康干预措施在卡车司机(SHIFT)中的群组随机对照试验:混合方法的过程评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Jul 7;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01316-x.
2
3
The effectiveness of the Structured Health Intervention For Truckers (SHIFT): a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT).《结构化健康干预措施在卡车司机中的效果(SHIFT):一项群组随机对照试验(RCT)》。
BMC Med. 2022 May 24;20(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02372-7.
4
Cluster randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a Structured Health Intervention For Truckers (the SHIFT study): a study protocol.一项旨在探究针对卡车司机的结构化健康干预措施(SHIFT 研究)有效性和成本效益的整群随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e030175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030175.
5
The intervention process in the European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) trial: a mixed method protocol for evaluation.欧洲球迷培训(EuroFIT)试验中的干预过程:一项用于评估的混合方法方案。
Trials. 2017 Jul 27;18(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2095-0.
6
Structured lifestyle education to support weight loss for people with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and first episode psychosis: the STEPWISE RCT.结构化生活方式教育以支持精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍和首发精神病患者减肥:STEPWISE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(65):1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta22650.
7
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
8
Behavioural interventions to promote physical activity in a multiethnic population at high risk of diabetes: PROPELS three-arm RCT.促进多种族高危糖尿病人群进行身体活动的行为干预:PROPELS 三臂 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(77):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta25770.
9
Reducing sitting at work: process evaluation of the SMArT Work (Stand More At Work) intervention.减少工作中的久坐:SMArT Work(Stand More At Work)干预措施的过程评估。
Trials. 2020 May 13;21(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04300-7.
10
A Structured Health Intervention for Truckers (SHIFT): A Process Evaluation of a Pilot Health Intervention in a Transport Company.卡车司机结构化健康干预(SHIFT):在运输公司中进行试点健康干预的过程评估。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Apr;60(4):377-385. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001258.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration of Barriers and Facilitators to Healthy Eating in UK Truck Drivers.英国卡车司机健康饮食的障碍与促进因素探究
Saf Health Work. 2025 Mar;16(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.12.001. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
Designing Gender-Responsive Health Promotion Programs for Men: A Scoping Review.为男性设计促进性别平等的健康促进项目:一项范围综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2025 Mar 17;52(4):10901981251322391. doi: 10.1177/10901981251322391.
3
Promoting substance use stigma resistance through an automated text message intervention (project RESTART): Outcomes of a pilot feasibility trial.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of the Structured Health Intervention For Truckers (SHIFT): a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT).《结构化健康干预措施在卡车司机中的效果(SHIFT):一项群组随机对照试验(RCT)》。
BMC Med. 2022 May 24;20(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02372-7.
2
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
3
Cardiometabolic risk factors and mental health status among truck drivers: a systematic review.
通过自动短信干预促进对物质使用污名的抵抗(重启项目):一项试点可行性试验的结果
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 May;172:209671. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2025.209671. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
4
The Feasibility of a Text-Messaging Intervention Promoting Physical Activity in Shift Workers: A Process Evaluation.促进轮班工人体力活动的短信干预的可行性:过程评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 13;20(4):3260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043260.
5
Drivers with and without Obesity Respond Differently to a Multi-Component Health Intervention in Heavy Goods Vehicle Drivers.肥胖与非肥胖驾驶员对重型货车驾驶员多组分健康干预的反应不同。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315546.
卡车司机的心血管代谢危险因素与心理健康状况:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 23;10(10):e038993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038993.
4
Fitbit-Based Interventions for Healthy Lifestyle Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于 Fitbit 的健康生活方式干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 12;22(10):e23954. doi: 10.2196/23954.
5
Reducing sitting at work: process evaluation of the SMArT Work (Stand More At Work) intervention.减少工作中的久坐:SMArT Work(Stand More At Work)干预措施的过程评估。
Trials. 2020 May 13;21(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04300-7.
6
Cluster randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a Structured Health Intervention For Truckers (the SHIFT study): a study protocol.一项旨在探究针对卡车司机的结构化健康干预措施(SHIFT 研究)有效性和成本效益的整群随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e030175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030175.
7
Effectiveness of the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work intervention: cluster randomised controlled trial.站立更多 AT(SMArT)工作干预的有效性: 集群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 10;363:k3870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3870.
8
Changing Diet and Physical Activity in Nurses: A Pilot Study and Process Evaluation Highlighting Challenges in Workplace Health Promotion.改变护士的饮食和体育活动:一项试点研究和过程评估,突出了工作场所健康促进面临的挑战。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Nov-Dec;50(10):1015-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.12.001. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
9
The Cognitive and Psychological Factors (Personality, Driving Behavior, and Mental Illnesses) As Predictors in Traffic Violations.作为交通违规预测因素的认知和心理因素(人格、驾驶行为和精神疾病)
Iran J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;12(2):78-86.
10
Relative validation of a food frequency questionnaire to estimate food intake in an adult population.一份用于估计成年人群食物摄入量的食物频率问卷的相对效度验证。
Food Nutr Res. 2017 Mar 29;61(1):1305193. doi: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1305193. eCollection 2017.