• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特蕾西判决对参与国家心脏骤停审计的英国医院院内心脏骤停发生率和结局的影响。

The impact of the Tracey judgment on the rates and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrests in UK hospitals participating in the National Cardiac Arrest Audit.

机构信息

Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.

Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May;20(3):319-323. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0454.

DOI:10.7861/clinmed.2019-0454
PMID:32414723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7354039/
Abstract

AIMS

The aim was to determine if the 17 June 2014 Tracey judgment regarding 'do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation' decisions led to increases in the rate of in-hospital cardiac arrests resulting in a resuscitation attempt (IHCA) and/or proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile.

METHOD

Using UK National Cardiac Arrest Audit data, the IHCA rate and proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile were compared for two periods (pre-judgment (01 July 2012 - 16 June 2014, inclusive) and post-judgment (01 July 2014 - 30 June 2016, inclusive)) using interrupted time series analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 43,109 IHCAs (115 hospitals) were analysed. There were fewer IHCAs post- than pre-judgment (21,324 vs 21,785, respectively). The IHCA rate was declining over time before the judgment but there was an abrupt and statistically significant increase in the period immediately following the judgment (p<0.001). This was not sustained post-judgment. The proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile was smaller post-judgment than pre-judgment (8.2% vs 14.9%, respectively). The rate of attempts deemed futile decreased post-judgment (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The IHCA rate increased immediately after the Tracey judgment while the proportion of resuscitation attempts deemed futile decreased. The precise mechanisms for these changes are unclear.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定特雷西案(Tracey judgment)中关于“不进行心肺复苏”的决定是否会导致院内心搏骤停(in-hospital cardiac arrest,IHCA)发生率增加,以及复苏尝试(resuscitation attempt)的比例是否会增加。

方法

本研究使用英国国家心脏骤停审计数据,采用中断时间序列分析,比较了两个时间段(判决前(2012 年 7 月 1 日至 2014 年 6 月 16 日,含首尾日期)和判决后(2014 年 7 月 1 日至 2016 年 6 月 30 日,含首尾日期))的 IHCA 发生率和被认为无效的复苏尝试比例。

结果

共分析了 43109 例 IHCA(115 家医院)。判决后 IHCA 例数较判决前减少(分别为 21324 例和 21785 例)。在判决前,IHCA 发生率呈下降趋势,但在判决后立即出现了突然且具有统计学意义的上升(p<0.001)。但这一趋势在判决后并未持续。判决后被认为无效的复苏尝试比例较判决前小(分别为 8.2%和 14.9%)。判决后被认为无效的复苏尝试率下降(p<0.001)。

结论

特雷西案判决后,IHCA 发生率立即上升,而被认为无效的复苏尝试比例下降。这些变化的确切机制尚不清楚。

相似文献

1
The impact of the Tracey judgment on the rates and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrests in UK hospitals participating in the National Cardiac Arrest Audit.特蕾西判决对参与国家心脏骤停审计的英国医院院内心脏骤停发生率和结局的影响。
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May;20(3):319-323. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0454.
2
Peri-operative decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation among adults as reported to the 7th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists.向皇家麻醉师学院第7次全国审计项目报告的关于成人围手术期心肺复苏的决策。
Anaesthesia. 2024 Feb;79(2):186-192. doi: 10.1111/anae.16179. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on in-hospital cardiac arrests in the UK.COVID-19 大流行对英国院内心脏骤停的影响。
Resuscitation. 2022 Apr;173:4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
In-hospital cardiac arrest survival before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Have higher performing hospitals stayed high-performing?COVID-19 大流行前后院内心脏骤停存活率:表现更好的医院是否一直表现出色?
Resuscitation. 2024 Oct;203:110374. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110374. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
5
The impact of resuscitation system factors on in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes across UK hospitals: An observational study.复苏系统因素对英国各医院院内心脏骤停结局的影响:一项观察性研究。
Resuscitation. 2020 Jun;151:166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
6
The association between time of in hospital cardiac arrest and mortality; a retrospective analysis of two UK databases.院内心脏骤停时间与死亡率之间的关联:对两个英国数据库的回顾性分析。
Resuscitation. 2023 May;186:109750. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109750. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
7
DNACPR decisions: challenging and changing practice in the wake of the Tracey judgment.心肺复苏决定:特雷西判决后具有挑战性且不断变化的实践
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Dec;14(6):571-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-571.
8
The landscape of paediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit.英国国家心脏骤停审计中的儿科院内心脏骤停情况
Resuscitation. 2020 Oct;155:165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.07.026. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Characteristics of patients who are not resuscitated in out of hospital cardiac arrests and opportunities to improve community response to cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停患者未复苏的特征及改善社区对心脏骤停反应的机会。
Resuscitation. 2016 Dec;109:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
10
Implications of a recurrent in-hospital cardiac arrest on survival and neurological outcomes.再次发生院内心搏骤停对生存和神经结局的影响。
Am Heart J. 2018 Aug;202:139-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19: the physician's response in the first phase.新型冠状病毒肺炎:医生在第一阶段的应对措施
Clin Med (Lond). 2020 May;20(3):237. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.ed.20.3.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
2
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of decision-making and implementation.不进行心肺复苏(DNACPR)指令:决策和实施的障碍及促进因素的系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2015 Mar;88:99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
3
Development and validation of risk models to predict outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest attended by a hospital-based resuscitation team.开发和验证风险模型,以预测由医院复苏团队参与的院内心搏骤停后的结局。
Resuscitation. 2014 Aug;85(8):993-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 14.
4
Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit.英国国家心脏骤停审核中院内心脏骤停的发生率和结局。
Resuscitation. 2014 Aug;85(8):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
5
Barriers to involving older people in their resuscitation decisions: the primary-secondary care mismatch highlights the potential role of general practitioners.在老年人的复苏决策中涉及到的障碍:初级保健和二级保健之间的不匹配突出了全科医生的潜在作用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;67(4):379-84. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12067.
6
Residents' practices and perceptions about do not resuscitate orders and pronouncing death: an opportunity for clinical training.住院医师关于“不要复苏”医嘱及宣布死亡的做法与认知:临床培训的契机
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011 Mar;28(2):94-7. doi: 10.1177/1049909110374599. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
7
Patients' attitudes towards "do not attempt resuscitation" status.患者对“不进行心肺复苏”状态的态度。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Aug;34(8):624-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022772.
8
Discussing preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what do resident physicians and their hospitalized patients think was decided?探讨对心肺复苏的偏好:住院医师及其住院患者认为做出了什么决定?
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jul;72(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.017. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
9
Medical residents' perspectives on discussions of advanced directives: can prior experience affect how they approach patients?住院医师对预立医疗指示讨论的看法:既往经历会影响他们对待患者的方式吗?
J Palliat Med. 2007 Jun;10(3):712-20. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.0220.
10
If asked, hospitalized patients will choose whether to receive life-sustaining therapies.如果被询问,住院患者将选择是否接受维持生命的治疗。
J Hosp Med. 2006 May;1(3):161-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.78.