• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定眼睑擦除器上皮病的最佳方法。

Optimal methodology for lid wiper epitheliopathy identification.

机构信息

The Eye Center, Southern College of Optometry Memphis, 1245 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.

Department of Vision & Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021 Jun;44(3):101332. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2020.04.016
PMID:32418871
Abstract

PURPOSE

Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) is a clinical sign that has been associated with dry eye disease. This study used a semi-automated method to identify the effect of drop instillation and post-dye viewing time on the absorption of lissamine green (LG) and sodium fluorescein (NaFl) on the upper eyelid in order to ascertain the optimal identification for LWE assessment.

METHODS

In 37 participants with LWE, 1-drop of 1% LG (10 μL) was applied to the superior bulbar conjunctiva in the right eye, and photographs of the lid margin were taken 1, 3, and 5 min after instillation. Measurements were repeated in the same eye following instillations of 2-drops of 1% LG. The same procedures were followed for application of 2% NaFl (2 μL) to the left eye. Staining area was determined using software to detect and measure dye-stained images. Analysis used a linear mixed model with fixed effects of time, number of drops and their interaction.

RESULTS

For LG, multivariate analysis showed that time of drop instillation was significant (p = 0.0091) as was the area of staining in the 2-drop versus 1-drop condition (p < 0.0001). For NaFl, there was a significant effect of time (p < 0.0001), drops (p < 0.0001), and a time/drops interaction (p < 0.0134), suggesting that both time and number of drops are important.

CONCLUSION

A single drop of dye is insufficient to reveal the full extent of LWE staining. A 2-drop instillation is recommended and observation is recommended between 1 and 5 min (LG) and between 3 and 5 min (NaFl).

摘要

目的

眼睑擦拭上皮病(LWE)是与干眼症相关的临床征象。本研究使用半自动方法来确定滴剂滴注和染色后观察时间对在上眼睑吸收丽丝胺绿(LG)和荧光素钠(NaFl)的影响,以确定用于 LWE 评估的最佳识别方法。

方法

在 37 名患有 LWE 的参与者中,右眼的上球结膜滴加 1%LG(10 μL)1 滴,滴注后 1、3 和 5 分钟拍摄眼睑缘照片。在同一只眼中重复滴加 2 滴 1%LG 的相同程序。在左眼应用 2%NaFl(2 μL)时,遵循相同的程序。使用软件检测和测量染色图像来确定染色区域。分析使用具有时间、滴数及其相互作用的固定效果的线性混合模型。

结果

对于 LG,多变量分析显示滴注时间具有显著影响(p = 0.0091),2 滴与 1 滴条件下的染色面积也具有显著影响(p < 0.0001)。对于 NaFl,时间(p < 0.0001)、滴数(p < 0.0001)和时间/滴数相互作用(p < 0.0134)均有显著影响,这表明时间和滴数都很重要。

结论

一滴染料不足以揭示 LWE 染色的全部范围。建议滴加 2 滴,并建议在 1 至 5 分钟(LG)和 3 至 5 分钟(NaFl)之间观察。

相似文献

1
Optimal methodology for lid wiper epitheliopathy identification.确定眼睑擦除器上皮病的最佳方法。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021 Jun;44(3):101332. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.04.016. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Impact of Improper Approach to Identify Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy (LWE).识别睑板擦痕上皮病变(LWE)方法不当的影响。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 6;14:3039-3047. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S273524. eCollection 2020.
3
Lid wiper epitheliopathy: The influence of multiple lid eversions and exposure time.眼睑擦拭上皮病:多次眼睑翻转和暴露时间的影响。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Jun;42(3):304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
4
Lid wiper epitheliopathy in symptomatic and asymptomatic dry eye subjects.症状性和无症状性干眼患者的眼睑边缘细胞病。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;71(4):1499-1502. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2709_22.
5
Comparison of subjective grading of lid wiper epitheliopathy with a semi-objective method.比较眼睑擦拭上皮病的主观分级与半客观方法。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Feb;41(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
Natural course of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) in symptomatic contact lens wearers.症状性隐形眼镜佩戴者的眼睑擦拭上皮病(LWE)自然病程。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022 Feb;45(1):101529. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.101529. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
7
Comparative performance of lissamine green stains.丽丝胺绿染色剂的比较性能。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Feb;41(1):23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
8
[Lid-wiper epitheliopathy in patients with dry eye symptoms].[干眼症状患者的睑缘擦拭上皮病变]
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2009 May;113(5):596-600.
9
Lid wiper epitheliopathy and dry eye symptoms.睑缘擦拭上皮病变与干眼症状。
Eye Contact Lens. 2005 Jan;31(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000140910.03095.fa.
10
Clinical Factors for Determining the Severity of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy in Dry Eye.临床因素对评估干眼患者的睑板腺功能障碍严重程度的影响。
Cornea. 2022 May 1;41(5):545-551. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002879.

引用本文的文献

1
Lissamine Green in Ophthalmology: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic and Clinical Applications.眼科中的丽丝胺绿:诊断及临床应用的全面综述
Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01168-1.
2
Investigating the Effect of Reducing the Signs and Symptoms of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy in Patients With Dry Eye Disease With Perfluorohexyloctane.研究全氟己基辛烷对减轻干眼患者睑缘擦拭上皮病变体征和症状的效果。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2025 Mar 20;102:100786. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2025.100786. eCollection 2025.
3
A Comparison of Physical Characteristics in Different Brands and Staining Techniques in a Brand of Lissamine Green Strips.
丽丝胺绿试纸条同一品牌不同批次及染色技术的物理特性比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 17;14(6):2022. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062022.
4
The effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on lid wiper epitheliopathy and ocular surface parameters.2型糖尿病对睑板擦痕上皮病变和眼表参数的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 26;10(17):e36912. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36912. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
5
A Hue-Value method for semi-automated assessment of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy.一种用于评估眼睑刮擦症的半自动 Hue-Value 方法。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024 Feb;47(1):102090. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.102090. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
6
Impact of Improper Approach to Identify Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy (LWE).识别睑板擦痕上皮病变(LWE)方法不当的影响。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 6;14:3039-3047. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S273524. eCollection 2020.