• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reasons for Facebook Usage: Data From 46 Countries.使用脸书的原因：来自46个国家的数据。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 30;11:711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00711. eCollection 2020.
2
Facebook Usage and Life Satisfaction.脸书使用情况与生活满意度。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 29;10:2711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02711. eCollection 2019.
3
Cultural and Personality Predictors of Facebook Intrusion: A Cross-Cultural Study.Facebook 侵扰行为的文化及个性预测因素：一项跨文化研究。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 2;7:1895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01895. eCollection 2016.
4
For whom is social-network usage associated with anxiety? The moderating role of neural working-memory filtering of Facebook information.社交网络使用与焦虑有关的人群是谁？神经工作记忆对 Facebook 信息过滤的调节作用。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1145-1158. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0627-z.
5
The impact of motives for Facebook use on Facebook addiction among ordinary users in Jordan.动机对约旦普通用户 Facebook 使用成瘾的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;64(6):528-535. doi: 10.1177/0020764018784616. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
6
Factors Influencing Facebook Usage and Facebook Addictive Tendency in University Students: The Role of Online Psychological Privacy and Facebook Usage Motivation.影响大学生Facebook使用情况及Facebook成瘾倾向的因素：网络心理隐私和Facebook使用动机的作用
Stress Health. 2016 Apr;32(2):117-27. doi: 10.1002/smi.2585. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
7
Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence.被动使用 Facebook 会损害情感幸福感：实验和纵向证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):480-8. doi: 10.1037/xge0000057. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
8
Cross-cultural comparisons of drinking motives in 10 countries: Data from the DRINC project.10 个国家饮酒动机的跨文化比较：DRINC 项目的数据。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 Nov;36(6):721-730. doi: 10.1111/dar.12464. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
9
Patients' and health professionals' use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations.患者和医疗保健专业人员在医疗保健中的社交媒体使用：动机、障碍和期望。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Sep;92(3):426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
10
Motives to use Facebook and problematic Facebook use in adolescents.使用 Facebook 的动机和青少年使用 Facebook 存在问题。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):276-283. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.32. Epub 2018 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Online profiling of volunteers in public health emergencies: insights from COVID-19 in China.突发公共卫生事件中志愿者的在线画像：来自中国新冠疫情的洞察
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21446-8.
2
Reply to: Differences in response-scale usage are ubiquitous in cross-country comparisons and a potential driver of elusive relationships.回复：在跨国比较中，反应量表使用的差异普遍存在，并且是难以捉摸的关系的一个潜在驱动因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60468-x.
3
Cyberbullying and cyber-victimisation among higher secondary school adolescents in an urban city of Nepal: a cross-sectional study.尼泊尔一城市中高中生中的网络欺凌和网络受害：一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 5;14(3):e081016. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081016.
4
Pattern of Facebook use by university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: relations with loneliness and resilience.新冠疫情期间大学生使用Facebook的模式：与孤独感和复原力的关系
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023;13(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s13278-023-01073-0. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
5
Love and affectionate touch toward romantic partners all over the world.世界各地的恋人间充满了爱与亲昵的触碰。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 4;13(1):5497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31502-1.
6
What drives me to use TikTok: A latent profile analysis of users' motives.是什么驱使我使用TikTok：对用户动机的潜在剖面分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:992824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992824. eCollection 2022.
7
Facebook Use and Cyberbullying by Students with Learning Disabilities: The Role of Self-Esteem and Loneliness.社交网站使用与学习障碍学生的网络欺凌：自尊与孤独的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2024 Jun;127(3):1237-1270. doi: 10.1177/00332941221138471. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
8
Perceived Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic Mediates the Association Between Self-quarantine Factors and Psychological Characteristics and Elevated Maladaptive Daydreaming.新冠疫情期间感知到的压力介导了自我隔离因素与心理特征及适应不良性白日梦增加之间的关联。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021 Nov 22:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00678-w.
9
Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios.人类择偶偏好的性别差异因性别比例而异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 28;288(1955):20211115. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1115. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
When and how does the number of children affect marital satisfaction? An international survey.何时以及如何影响儿童的数量对婚姻满意度？一项国际调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0249516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249516. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.45 个国家的配偶偏好整合对比计算模型
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 15;9(1):16885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52748-8.
2
Development of the 'SNS older adults measure' (SNS-OA) to examine social network site use in older adults.开发“SNS 老年人量表”（SNS-OA），以考察老年人对社交网站的使用情况。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Jan;25(1):68-77. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1673700. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
Do Online Privacy Concerns Predict Selfie Behavior among Adolescents, Young Adults and Adults?对在线隐私的担忧能否预测青少年、年轻人和成年人的自拍行为？
Front Psychol. 2017 May 23;8:815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00815. eCollection 2017.
4
Cultural and Personality Predictors of Facebook Intrusion: A Cross-Cultural Study.Facebook 侵扰行为的文化及个性预测因素：一项跨文化研究。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 2;7:1895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01895. eCollection 2016.
5
A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences.《社交媒体科学领域的 Facebook 研究综述》。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 May;7(3):203-20. doi: 10.1177/1745691612442904.
6
The influence of the digital divide on face preferences in El Salvador: people without internet access prefer more feminine men, more masculine women, and women with higher adiposity.数字鸿沟对萨尔瓦多面部偏好的影响：无法接入互联网的人群更喜欢女性化的男性、更具男子气概的女性以及肥胖程度更高的女性。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 9;9(7):e100966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100966. eCollection 2014.
7
Why Do People Use Facebook?人们为什么使用脸书？
Pers Individ Dif. 2012 Feb 1;52(3):243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
8
Contingencies of self-worth and social-networking-site behavior.自我价值感的偶然性与社交网站行为。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Jan-Feb;14(1-2):41-9. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0049. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
9
Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization.脸书个人资料反映的是真实个性，而非自我理想化。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):372-4. doi: 10.1177/0956797609360756. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
10
Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication.美国社交媒体的使用：对健康传播的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Nov 27;11(4):e48. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1249.

Reasons for Facebook Usage: Data From 46 Countries.

作者信息

Kowal Marta, Sorokowski Piotr, Sorokowska Agnieszka, Dobrowolska Małgorzata, Pisanski Katarzyna, Oleszkiewicz Anna, Aavik Toivo, Akello Grace, Alm Charlotte, Amjad Naumana, Anjum Afifa, Asao Kelly, Atama Chiemezie S, Atamtürk Duyar Derya, Ayebare Richard, Bendixen Mons, Bensafia Aicha, Bizumic Boris, Boussena Mahmoud, Buss David M, Butovskaya Marina, Can Seda, Cantarero Katarzyna, Carrier Antonin, Cetinkaya Hakan, Conroy-Beam Daniel, Varella Marco A C, Cueto Rosa M, Czub Marcin, Dronova Daria, Dural Seda, Duyar Izzet, Ertugrul Berna, Espinosa Agustín, Estevan Ignacio, Esteves Carla S, Frackowiak Tomasz, Contreras-Graduño Jorge, Guemaz Farida, Hromatko Ivana, Hui Chin-Ming, Herak Iskra, Jaafar Jas L, Jiang Feng, Kafetsios Konstantinos, Kavcic Tina, Kennair Leif Edward Ottesen, Kervyn Nicolas, Köbis Nils C, Láng András, Lennard Georgina R, León Ernesto, Lindholm Torun, Lopez Giulia, Madallh Alhabahba Mohammad, Mailhos Alvaro, Manesi Zoi, Martínez Rocío, McKerchar Sarah L, Meskó Norbert, Misra Girishwar, Moc Lan Hoang, Monaghan Conal, Mora Emanuel C, Moya Garófano Alba, Musil Bojan, Natividade Jean C, Nizharadze George, Oberzaucher Elisabeth, Omar Fauzee Mohd S, Onyishi Ike E, Özener Baris, Pagani Ariela F, Pakalniskiene Vilmante, Parise Miriam, Pazhoohi Farid, Perun Mariia, Pisanski Annette, Plohl Nejc, Popa Camelia, Prokop Pavol, Rizwan Muhammad, Sainz Mario, Salkičević Svjetlana, Sargautyte Ruta, Schmehl Susanne, Senyk Oksana, Shaikh Rizwana, Sharad Shivantika, Simonetti Franco, Tadinac Meri, Thi Khanh Ha Truong, Thi Linh Trinh, Ugalde González Karina, Van Luot Nguyen, Vauclair Christin-Melanie, Vega Luis D, Yoo Gyesook, Yordanova Stoyanova Stanislava, Zadeh Zainab F, Zupančič Maja

机构信息

University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.

Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 30;11:711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00711. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00711
PMID:32425849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7204544/
Abstract
摘要