Wendt Alexander Nicolai
Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 30;11:855. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00855. eCollection 2020.
Real-life problems are almost always socially complex, even when we are by ourselves. Psychological problem-solving research must therefore integrate complexity as a domain of investigation. However, the simulation of complex interactions represents a major challenge to designing experiments dealing with the nature of social interaction: Simulated social interaction, even when enacted by confederates, is not identical to the actual social interaction. Subjects will tend to enact simulated interaction in distinct ways. To understand these differences, the different situation enactments ought to be analyzed psychologically. Essentially, an instruction to perform in an experimental setting cannot guarantee that the experimental subject will take a certain attitude toward the situation. Early psychology of thought considered the social nature of the experimental situation when discussing the notion of the task. Modern experimental psychology can draw on these reflections in order to grasp better the essential characteristics of social complexity and to establish pseudo-interactivity as a phenomenologically enriched experimental paradigm. Its methodological power is illustrated by an exploratory experimentation on problem-solving.
现实生活中的问题几乎总是具有社会复杂性,即使我们独自一人时也是如此。因此,心理问题解决研究必须将复杂性作为一个研究领域加以整合。然而,模拟复杂互动对设计涉及社会互动本质的实验构成了重大挑战:模拟社会互动,即使是由同谋进行的,也与实际社会互动并不相同。受试者倾向于以不同的方式进行模拟互动。为了理解这些差异,应该从心理学角度分析不同的情境表现。从本质上讲,在实验环境中执行的指令并不能保证实验对象会对该情境采取某种态度。早期的思维心理学在讨论任务概念时考虑了实验情境的社会性质。现代实验心理学可以借鉴这些思考,以便更好地把握社会复杂性的本质特征,并将伪互动确立为一种现象学上丰富的实验范式。关于问题解决的探索性实验说明了其方法论的力量。