• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019年冠状病毒病疫情期间的错误信息:知识如何从噪音中浮现。

Misinformation During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak: How Knowledge Emerges From Noise.

作者信息

Rochwerg Bram, Parke Rachael, Murthy Srinivas, Fernando Shannon M, Leigh Jeanna Parsons, Marshall John, Adhikari Neill K J, Fiest Kirsten, Fowler Rob, Lamontagne François, Sevransky Jonathan E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2020 Apr 29;2(4):e0098. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000098. eCollection 2020 Apr.

DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000098
PMID:32426740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7188430/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Although the amount of information generated during this most recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is enormous, much is of uncertain trustworthiness. This review summaries the many potential sources of information that clinicians turn to during pandemic illness, the challenges associated with performing methodologically sound research in this setting and potential approaching to conducting well done research during a health crisis.

DATA SOURCES

Not applicable.

STUDY SELECTION

Not applicable.

DATA EXTRACTION

Not applicable.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Not applicable.

CONCLUSIONS

Pandemics and healthcare crises provide extraordinary opportunities for the rapid generation of reliable scientific information but also for misinformation, especially in the early phases, which may contribute to public hysteria. The best way to combat misinformation is with trustworthy data produced by healthcare researchers. Although challenging, research can occur during pandemics and crises and is facilitated by advance planning, governmental support, targeted funding opportunities, and collaboration with industry partners. The coronavirus disease 2019 research response has highlighted both the dangers of misinformation as well as the benefits and possibilities of performing rigorous research during challenging times.

摘要

未标注

尽管在最近的2019冠状病毒病大流行期间产生的信息量巨大,但其中许多信息的可信度存疑。本综述总结了临床医生在大流行疾病期间所求助的众多潜在信息来源、在此背景下开展方法合理的研究面临的挑战以及在健康危机期间进行高质量研究的潜在方法。

数据来源

不适用。

研究选择

不适用。

数据提取

不适用。

数据综合

不适用。

结论

大流行和医疗保健危机既为快速生成可靠的科学信息提供了绝佳机会,也为错误信息的传播创造了条件,尤其是在早期阶段,这可能会导致公众恐慌。对抗错误信息的最佳方式是依靠医疗保健研究人员提供的可信数据。尽管存在挑战,但在大流行和危机期间仍可开展研究,提前规划、政府支持、有针对性的资金机会以及与行业伙伴的合作有助于研究的进行。2019冠状病毒病的研究应对措施既凸显了错误信息的危害,也展现了在困难时期进行严谨研究的益处和可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/7188430/10a5e4fc5e2f/cc9-2-e0098-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/7188430/70fc504ea290/cc9-2-e0098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/7188430/8a51828bb86c/cc9-2-e0098-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/7188430/10a5e4fc5e2f/cc9-2-e0098-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/7188430/70fc504ea290/cc9-2-e0098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/7188430/8a51828bb86c/cc9-2-e0098-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/7188430/10a5e4fc5e2f/cc9-2-e0098-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Misinformation During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak: How Knowledge Emerges From Noise.2019年冠状病毒病疫情期间的错误信息:知识如何从噪音中浮现。
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Apr 29;2(4):e0098. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000098. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Online Information Exchange and Anxiety Spread in the Early Stage of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak in South Korea: Structural Topic Model and Network Analysis.韩国新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情早期的在线信息交流与焦虑传播:结构主题模型与网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e19455. doi: 10.2196/19455.
3
Framework for Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Methods and Results of an Online, Crowdsourced WHO Technical Consultation.管理新冠疫情信息疫情的框架:世卫组织在线众包技术磋商会的方法与结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e19659. doi: 10.2196/19659.
4
Demographic Factors Influencing the Impact of Coronavirus-Related Misinformation on WhatsApp: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.影响 WhatsApp 上与冠状病毒相关错误信息影响的人口统计学因素:横断面问卷调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 30;7(1):e19858. doi: 10.2196/19858.
5
Humanitarian health computing using artificial intelligence and social media: A narrative literature review.利用人工智能和社交媒体进行人道主义健康计算:叙事文献综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jun;114:136-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Temporal and Location Variations, and Link Categories for the Dissemination of COVID-19-Related Information on Twitter During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Europe: Infoveillance Study.欧洲SARS-CoV-2疫情期间推特上新冠疫情相关信息传播的时间和地点变化以及链接类别:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e19629. doi: 10.2196/19629.
8
"Ask a Doctor About Coronavirus": How Physicians on Social Media Can Provide Valid Health Information During a Pandemic.“向医生咨询新冠病毒相关问题”:社交媒体上的医生如何在疫情期间提供有效的健康信息。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 20;23(4):e24586. doi: 10.2196/24586.
9
The Networked Context of COVID-19 Misinformation: Informational Homogeneity on YouTube at the Beginning of the Pandemic.新冠疫情虚假信息的网络背景:疫情初期YouTube上的信息同质化
Online Soc Netw Media. 2021 Nov;26:100164. doi: 10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100164. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
10
Coronavirus Goes Viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 Misinformation Epidemic on Twitter.冠状病毒迅速传播:量化推特上关于新冠疫情的错误信息传播情况
Cureus. 2020 Mar 13;12(3):e7255. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7255.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust in information sources as a moderator of the impact of COVID-19 anxiety and exposure to information on conspiracy thinking and misinformation beliefs: a multilevel study.信任信息源可调节 COVID-19 焦虑和信息接触对阴谋论思维和错误信息信念的影响:一项多层次研究。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Nov 7;11(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01425-7.
2
COVID-19 Lessons Learned: Response to the Anticipated Ventilator Shortage.COVID-19 经验教训:应对预计的呼吸机短缺。
Respir Care. 2023 Jan;68(1):129-150. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10676.
3
The need for a holistic approach toward pandemic control: lessons from a cross-sectional study on COVID-19 in Meghalaya, India.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Media and Emergency Preparedness in Response to Novel Coronavirus.社交媒体与应对新型冠状病毒的应急准备
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2011-2012. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4469.
2
Potential association between COVID-19 mortality and health-care resource availability.新型冠状病毒肺炎死亡率与医疗资源可及性之间的潜在关联。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e480. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30068-1. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany.德国一名无症状接触者传播2019新型冠状病毒感染
需要采取整体方法控制大流行:印度梅加拉亚邦 COVID-19 横断面研究的经验教训。
J Public Health Policy. 2022 Dec;43(4):515-529. doi: 10.1057/s41271-022-00380-8. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Health information use by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pre and during the COVID-19 pandemic.系统性红斑狼疮患者在 COVID-19 大流行前及期间对健康信息的使用。
Lupus Sci Med. 2022 Oct;9(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000755.
5
Social Media and the Quest for Equity and Diversity in Oncology: On Safe Spaces and the Concept of the Public Physician.社交媒体与肿瘤学中的公平与多样性追求:论安全空间与公众医生理念。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Aug;18(8):572-577. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00762. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
Public perceptions during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: a demographic analysis of self-reported beliefs, behaviors, and information acquisition.加拿大 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间的公众认知:自我报告的信仰、行为和信息获取的人口统计学分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13058-3.
7
Discerning Fact From Fiction: An Assessment of Coronavirus-19 Misinformation Among Patients in Rural Michigan.辨别事实与虚构:密歇根州农村地区患者中关于冠状病毒病19的错误信息评估
Cureus. 2022 Jan 29;14(1):e21710. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21710. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Systems to support scholarly social media: a qualitative exploration of enablers and barriers to new scholarship in academic medicine.支持学术社交媒体的系统:对学术医学领域新学术成果的促成因素和障碍的定性探索
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Dec 29;12(6):14-27. doi: 10.36834/cmej.72490. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Perceptions of adult Arkansans regarding trusted sources of information about the COVID-19 pandemic.阿肯色州成年人对 COVID-19 大流行相关信息的可信来源的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):2306. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12385-1.
10
Assessing adolescents' critical health literacy: How is trust in government leadership associated with knowledge of COVID-19?评估青少年的关键健康素养:对政府领导力的信任如何与对 COVID-19 的了解相关?
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 24;16(11):e0259523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259523. eCollection 2021.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):970-971. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001468. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
Evaluating Promising Investigational Medical Countermeasures: Recommendations in the Absence of Guidelines.评估有前途的研究性医疗对策:在缺乏指导方针的情况下的建议。
Health Secur. 2019 Jan/Feb;17(1):46-53. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0092. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
5
Social value, clinical equipoise, and research in a public health emergency.社会价值、临床平衡和公共卫生紧急情况下的研究。
Bioethics. 2019 Mar;33(3):326-334. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12467. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
Development of rapid guidelines: 3. GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for rapid recommendations.快速指南的制定:3. 用于快速推荐的 GIN-McMaster 指南制定清单扩展。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 13;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0330-0.
7
Introduction to BMJ Rapid Recommendations.《英国医学杂志》快速推荐介绍
BMJ. 2016 Sep 28;354:i5191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5191.
8
Developing WHO rapid advice guidelines in the setting of a public health emergency.在突发公共卫生事件背景下制定世界卫生组织快速建议指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials.临床试验的适应性设计
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 7;375(1):65-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510061.
10
Twitter as a tool for communication and knowledge exchange in academic medicine: A guide for skeptics and novices.推特作为学术医学领域交流与知识共享的工具:给怀疑者和新手的指南。
Med Teach. 2015 May;37(5):411-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.993371. Epub 2014 Dec 19.