Falcari Thays, Saotome Osamu, Pires Ricardo, Campo Alexandre Brincalepe
1Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), Praça Marechal Eduardo Gomes, 50 - Vila das Acacias, São José dos Campos, SP 12228-900 Brazil.
2Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP), R. Pedro Vicente, 625 - Canindé, São Paulo, SP 01109-010 Brazil.
Biomed Eng Lett. 2019 Nov 27;10(2):275-284. doi: 10.1007/s13534-019-00141-9. eCollection 2020 May.
One-vs-One (OVO) and One-vs-All (OVA) are decomposition methods for multi-class strategies used to allow binary Support-Vector Machines (SVM) to transform a given k-class problem into pairwise small problems. In this context, the present work proposes the analysis of these two decomposition methods applied to the hand posture recognition problem in which the sEMG data of eight participants were collected by means of an 8-channel armband bracelet located on the forearm. Linear, Polynomial and Radial Basis Function kernels functions and its adjustments level were implemented combined to the strategies OVO and OVA to compare the performance of the SVM when mapping posture data into the classification spaces spanned by the studied kernels. Acquired sEMG signals were segmented considering 0.16 s e 0.32 s time windows. Root Mean Square (RMS) feature was extracted from each time window of each posture and used for SVM training. The present work focused in investigating the relationship between the multi-class strategies combined to kernels adjustments levels and SVM classification performance. Promising results were observed using OVA strategy which presents a reduced number of binary SVM implementation achieved a mean accuracy of 97.63%.
一对一(OVO)和一对多(OVA)是用于多类策略的分解方法,用于使二元支持向量机(SVM)将给定的k类问题转化为成对的小问题。在此背景下,本研究提出对这两种分解方法应用于手部姿势识别问题进行分析,其中八名参与者的表面肌电(sEMG)数据通过位于前臂的8通道臂带式手环进行采集。将线性、多项式和径向基函数核函数及其调整水平与OVO和OVA策略相结合来实施,以比较SVM在将姿势数据映射到由所研究的核所跨越的分类空间时的性能。考虑0.16秒至0.32秒的时间窗口对采集到的sEMG信号进行分段。从每个姿势的每个时间窗口提取均方根(RMS)特征并用于SVM训练。本研究专注于探究多类策略与核调整水平相结合和SVM分类性能之间的关系。使用OVA策略观察到了有前景的结果,该策略实现的二元SVM实施数量减少,平均准确率达到了97.63%。