Travia Ryan M, Larcus James G, Andes Stacy, Gomes Paula G
Student Affairs, Babson College, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA.
Health and Counseling Center, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.
J Am Coll Health. 2022 Apr;70(3):758-772. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1763369. Epub 2020 May 20.
This investigatory study sought to explore the range and variation of well-being initiatives on a select cross-section of college campuses across the United States and in Canada. This whitepaper seeks to highlight innovative practices that may inspire institutions to consider new ways of promoting well-being for both students and employees. In this whitepaper, we report findings from 10 participating higher education institutions across three major categories: student-serving programs, employee-serving programs, and hybrid programs. The qualitative data collected from key stakeholder interviews and focus groups were analyzed for trends between and across institutions. Importantly, the results of this study are intended to be hypothesis-generating as opposed to hypothesis-testing. In an effort to describe the state of the field with respect to both common and innovative practices the findings have generated additional questions for further research. Several themes emerged from this study: (1) Campuses have not adopted a universally-accepted definition of well-being; (2) While many institutions are using iterations of the wellness wheel and its various dimensions (e.g. physical, emotional, intellectual, social, spiritual, financial) to guide their efforts, there is not a dominant model for structuring or measuring well-being initiatives on campus; (3) There appears to be a systematic shift from use of the term "wellness" to "well-being"; (4) While many institutions are still utilizing traditional health education practices, there appears to be a movement toward more systemic, environmental approaches to well- being, including structural, organizational, and financial strategies, in addition to a range of policy initiatives; (5) There is a range of engagement in well-being initiatives, with significant variance based on institutional philosophy; and (6) Many institutions are designing well-being initiatives that address health disparities-particularly among underrepresented or marginalized populations.
这项调查研究旨在探索美国和加拿大部分大学校园中福祉倡议的范围和变化。本白皮书旨在突出创新实践,以激励各机构思考促进学生和员工福祉的新方法。在本白皮书中,我们报告了来自10所参与研究的高等教育机构的三类主要调查结果:学生服务项目、员工服务项目和混合项目。对从关键利益相关者访谈和焦点小组收集的定性数据进行分析,以找出各机构之间以及机构内部的趋势。重要的是,本研究的结果旨在生成假设,而非检验假设。为了描述该领域在常见和创新实践方面的状况,这些研究结果引发了更多有待进一步研究的问题。本研究出现了几个主题:(1)校园尚未采用普遍接受的福祉定义;(2)虽然许多机构正在使用健康轮及其各个维度(如身体、情感、智力、社交、精神、财务)的迭代版本来指导工作,但校园中构建或衡量福祉倡议并没有一个主导模式;(3)从“健康”一词的使用到“福祉”似乎有一个系统性的转变;(4)虽然许多机构仍在采用传统的健康教育实践,但除了一系列政策倡议外,似乎正在朝着更具系统性、环境性的福祉方法转变,包括结构、组织和财务战略;(5)福祉倡议的参与程度各不相同,因机构理念而异;(6)许多机构正在设计旨在解决健康差距的福祉倡议,尤其是在代表性不足或边缘化人群中。