• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Age differences in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning and extinction in rats.大鼠食欲性巴甫洛夫条件反射及消退中的年龄差异
Physiol Behav. 2016 Dec 1;167:354-362. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
2
Corticostriatal Suppression of Appetitive Pavlovian Conditioned Responding.皮质纹状体对食欲性巴甫洛夫条件反应的抑制。
J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 2;42(5):834-849. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1664-21.2021. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
3
How partial reinforcement of food cues affects the extinction and reacquisition of appetitive responses. A new model for dieting success?食物线索的部分强化如何影响食欲反应的消退和重新习得。一种节食成功的新模型?
Appetite. 2014 Oct;81:242-52. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
4
Renewal of conditioned responding to food cues in rats: Sex differences and relevance of estradiol.大鼠对食物线索的条件反应恢复:性别差异及雌二醇的相关性。
Physiol Behav. 2015 Nov 1;151:338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.035. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
5
Inactivating the infralimbic but not prelimbic medial prefrontal cortex facilitates the extinction of appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in Long-Evans rats.使下边缘而非边缘前内侧前额叶皮质失活,可促进长 Evans 大鼠中食欲性巴甫洛夫条件反射的消退。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015 Feb;118:198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
6
Reinforcer-specificity of appetitive and consummatory behavior of rats after Pavlovian conditioning with food reinforcers.用食物强化物进行巴甫洛夫条件反射后大鼠食欲和满足行为的强化物特异性。
Physiol Behav. 2007 May 16;91(1):95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.021. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
7
Individual differences in anticipatory activity to food rewards predict cue-induced appetitive 50-kHz calls in rats.大鼠对食物奖励的预期活动中的个体差异可预测线索诱发的食欲性50千赫叫声。
Physiol Behav. 2015 Oct 1;149:107-18. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 May 17.
8
Perseverative instrumental and Pavlovian responding to conditioned stimuli in serotonin transporter knockout rats.5-羟色胺转运体敲除大鼠对条件刺激的持续操作性和巴甫洛夫反应。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2013 Feb;100:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2012.12.004. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
9
Orexin/hypocretin receptor 1 signaling mediates Pavlovian cue-food conditioning and extinction.食欲素/下丘脑泌素受体1信号传导介导巴甫洛夫条件性线索-食物条件反射及消退。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Aug 1;162:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.02.042. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
10
Lesions of rat infralimbic cortex result in disrupted retardation but normal summation test performance following training on a Pavlovian conditioned inhibition procedure.大鼠边缘下皮质损伤会导致在巴甫洛夫条件性抑制程序训练后延缓反应受到干扰,但总和测试表现正常。
Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Nov;26(9):2654-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05855.x. Epub 2007 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescent and adult age differences in palatable food learning and consumption.青少年与成年人在美味食物学习与消费方面的年龄差异。
Physiol Behav. 2025 Nov 1;301:115074. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.115074. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
2
The beautiful adolescent brain: An evolutionary developmental perspective.美丽的青少年大脑:进化发展视角
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Apr;1546(1):58-74. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15314. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
Associative learning via eyeblink conditioning differs by age from infancy to adulthood.通过眨眼条件反射进行的联想学习在从婴儿期到成年期的不同年龄段存在差异。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 16;2(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00176-4.
4
Reward-motivated memories influence new learning across development.奖励动机记忆影响整个发展过程中的新学习。
Learn Mem. 2022 Oct 17;29(11):421-429. doi: 10.1101/lm.053595.122. Print 2022 Nov.
5
Reinforcement learning and Bayesian inference provide complementary models for the unique advantage of adolescents in stochastic reversal.强化学习和贝叶斯推断为青少年在随机反转中的独特优势提供了互补的模型。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jun;55:101106. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101106. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
A Role for Serotonin in Modulating Opposing Drive and Brake Circuits of Impulsivity.血清素在调节冲动的对立驱动和制动回路中的作用。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 17;16:791749. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.791749. eCollection 2022.
7
Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.刺激-刺激配对中的翻译:学习者发声的自动塑造
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Nov 25;43(1):57-103. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00228-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
Increased Goal Tracking in Adolescent Rats Is Goal-Directed and Not Habit-Like.青春期大鼠目标追踪能力增强具有目标导向性而非习惯性。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jan 14;13:291. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00291. eCollection 2019.
9
Adolescent but not adult Sprague-Dawley rats display goal-directed responding after reward devaluation.青春期而非成年期的 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠在奖励贬值后表现出目标导向反应。
Dev Psychobiol. 2020 Apr;62(3):368-379. doi: 10.1002/dev.21912. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Translating Developmental Neuroscience to Understand Risk for Psychiatric Disorders.将发展神经科学转化为理解精神障碍风险的方法。
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 1;176(3):179-185. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19010091.

本文引用的文献

1
Dealing With Uncertainty: Testing Risk- and Ambiguity-Attitude Across Adolescence.应对不确定性:测试青少年时期的风险和模糊态度。
Dev Neuropsychol. 2016 Jan-Mar;41(1-2):77-92. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2016.1158265. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
2
Conditioned reinforcement and information theory reconsidered.对条件强化与信息理论的重新思考。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Mar;103(2):405-18. doi: 10.1002/jeab.142.
3
Incentive salience attribution under reward uncertainty: A Pavlovian model.奖励不确定性下的动机显著性归因:一种巴甫洛夫模型。
Behav Processes. 2015 Feb;111:6-18. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
4
The Teenage Brain: Self Control.青少年的大脑:自我控制
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr 1;22(2):82-87. doi: 10.1177/0963721413480170.
5
Too little and too much: hypoactivation and disinhibition of medial prefrontal cortex cause attentional deficits.过少和过多:内侧前额叶皮质的低激活和去抑制导致注意力缺陷。
J Neurosci. 2014 Jun 4;34(23):7931-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3450-13.2014.
6
Special issue on the teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation.青少年大脑特刊:对社会评价的敏感性
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr 1;22(2):121-127. doi: 10.1177/0963721413476512.
7
The ontogeny of learned inhibition.习得性抑制的发生发展。
Learn Mem. 2014 Feb 18;21(3):143-52. doi: 10.1101/lm.033787.113.
8
Information: theory, brain, and behavior.信息:理论、大脑与行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Nov;100(3):408-31. doi: 10.1002/jeab.49. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
9
On the motivational properties of reward cues: Individual differences.奖励线索的动机属性:个体差异。
Neuropharmacology. 2014 Jan;76 Pt B(0 0):450-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.05.040. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
10
Prelimbic and infralimbic neurons signal distinct aspects of appetitive instrumental behavior.前额皮质和下边缘皮质神经元信号传递不同方面的奖赏性工具行为。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057575. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

大鼠食欲性巴甫洛夫条件反射及消退中的年龄差异

Age differences in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning and extinction in rats.

作者信息

Meyer Heidi C, Bucci David J

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2016 Dec 1;167:354-362. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.10.004
PMID:27737779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5159263/
Abstract

Mounting evidence indicates that adolescents exhibit heightened sensitivity to rewards and reward-related cues compared to adults, and that adolescents are often unable to exert behavioral control in the face of such cues. Moreover, differences in reward processing during adolescence have been linked to heightened risk taking and impulsivity. However, little is known about the processes by which adolescents learn about the appetitive properties of environmental stimuli that signal reward. To address this, Pavlovian conditioning procedures were used to test for differences in excitatory conditioning between adult and adolescent rats using various schedules of reinforcement. Specifically, separate cohorts of adult and adolescent rats were trained under conditions of consistent (continuous) or intermittent (partial) reinforcement. We found that the acquisition of anticipatory responding to a continuously-reinforced cue proceeded similarly in adolescents and adults. In contrast, responding increased at a greater rate in adolescents compared to adults during presentations of a partially-reinforced cue. We subsequently compared the ability of adolescent and adult rats to dynamically adjust the representation of a reward-predictive cue during extinction trials, in which a secondary inhibitory representation is acquired for the previously-reinforced stimulus. We observed significant age differences in the ability to flexibly update cue representations during extinction, in that the appetitive properties of cues with a history of either continuous or partial reinforcement persisted to a greater extent in adolescents relative to adults.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,与成年人相比,青少年对奖励及与奖励相关的线索表现出更高的敏感性,而且青少年在面对此类线索时往往无法实施行为控制。此外,青春期奖励处理过程中的差异与更高的冒险行为和冲动性有关。然而,对于青少年了解标志奖励的环境刺激的偏好特性的过程,人们知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,采用经典条件作用程序,使用各种强化时间表来测试成年大鼠和幼年大鼠在兴奋性条件作用方面的差异。具体来说,将成年大鼠和幼年大鼠分成不同组,在持续(连续)或间歇(部分)强化条件下进行训练。我们发现,青少年和成年人对持续强化线索的预期反应的习得过程相似。相比之下,在呈现部分强化线索期间,青少年的反应速度比成年人更快。随后,我们比较了成年大鼠和幼年大鼠在消退试验期间动态调整奖励预测线索表征的能力,在消退试验中,会为先前强化的刺激获得一种次要的抑制性表征。我们观察到,在消退过程中灵活更新线索表征的能力存在显著的年龄差异,即相对于成年人,有连续或部分强化历史的线索的偏好特性在青少年中持续的程度更大。