Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(2):237-247. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa611.
Although Staphylococcus aureus and gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (SAB/GNB) cause substantial morbidity, little is known regarding patient perceptions' of their impact on quality of life (QOL). Guidance for assessing QOL and disease-specific measures are lacking. We conducted a descriptive qualitative study to gain an in-depth understanding of patients' experiences with SAB/GNB and concept elicitation phase to inform a patient-reported QOL outcome measure.
We conducted prospective one-time, in-depth, semi-structured, individual, qualitative telephone interviews 6- 8 weeks following bloodstream infection with either SAB or GNB. Patients were enrolled in an institutional registry (tertiary academic medical center) for SAB or GNB. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. Directed content analysis identified a priori and emergent themes. Theme matrix techniques were used to facilitate analysis and presentation.
Interviews were completed with 30 patients with SAB and 31 patients with GNB. Most patients were at or near the end of intravenous antibiotic treatment when interviewed. We identified 3 primary high-level concepts: impact on QOL domains, time as a critical index, and sources of variability across patients. Across both types of bloodstream infection, the QOL domains most impacted were physical and functional, which was particularly evident among patients with SAB.
SAB/GNB impact QOL among survivors. In particular, SAB had major impacts on multiple QOL domains. A combination of existing, generic measures that are purposefully selected and disease-specific items, if necessary, could best capture these impacts. Engaging patients as stakeholders and obtaining their feedback is crucial to conducting patient-centered clinical trials and providing patient-centered care.
金黄色葡萄球菌和革兰氏阴性菌血流感染(SAB/GNB)会导致严重的发病率,但人们对患者对其生活质量(QOL)影响的看法知之甚少。目前缺乏评估 QOL 和疾病特异性措施的指南。我们进行了一项描述性的定性研究,以深入了解患者的 SAB/GNB 感染经历,并进行概念提取阶段,为患者报告的 QOL 结局测量提供信息。
我们在血流感染 SAB 或 GNB 后 6-8 周,对患者进行了前瞻性、一次性、深入、半结构化、个体、定性电话访谈。患者在 SAB 或 GNB 的机构注册中心(三级学术医疗中心)中注册。访谈以音频记录、转录和编码。定向内容分析确定了事先和新出现的主题。主题矩阵技术用于促进分析和展示。
共对 30 名 SAB 患者和 31 名 GNB 患者进行了访谈。大多数患者在接受访谈时接近或已完成静脉用抗生素治疗。我们确定了 3 个主要的高级别概念:对 QOL 领域的影响、时间是一个关键指标以及患者之间的变异性来源。在两种类型的血流感染中,受影响最大的 QOL 领域是身体和功能,这在 SAB 患者中尤为明显。
SAB/GNB 对幸存者的 QOL 产生影响。特别是 SAB 对多个 QOL 领域产生了重大影响。如果需要,最好通过有目的地选择现有、通用的测量方法和疾病特异性项目来最好地捕捉这些影响。让患者作为利益相关者参与并获得他们的反馈对于进行以患者为中心的临床试验和提供以患者为中心的护理至关重要。