Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA.
Vaccine. 2020 Jun 15;38(29):4616-4624. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.079. Epub 2020 May 22.
Although global progress in measles control has been realized, achieving elimination has proven difficult in many regions of the world. China has adopted a goal of measles elimination but recent outbreaks predominantly affecting children <8 months who are ineligible for vaccination and incompletely protected by maternal antibodies has impeded progress. We assess the cost-effectiveness of adding an initial measles vaccine dose in China to earlier than the currently recommended 8 months of age.
We conducted a cost-utility analysis comparing the costs and health benefits associated with adding a measles vaccine dose to the routine schedule at 4, 5, 6 or 7 months compared to the current recommendation for the first dose at age 8 months. A decision analytic model was developed in Microsoft Excel, including five non-severe and two fatal health outcomes associated with measles infection. Model parameters were informed by the literature and surveillance data. Future costs and health benefits were discounted at 3%. Primary outcomes included costs, Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a lifetime time horizon.
Lowering the recommended age for initiating the measles vaccination series to address susceptibility in children <8 months provided incremental health gains compared to minimal costs at the individual-level. The ICER was most favorable ($232.70 per QALY gain) for administering an initial dose at 4 months of age due to fewer incremental program costs when shifting measles administration to an immunization visit already established under the Chinese vaccination program.
We found potential beneficial health gains at a minimum cost associated with adding an earlier measles dose <8 months of age in China. Further investigation about disease transmission dynamics is required to more fully assess the tradeoffs of administering measles at a younger age to infants in China.
尽管在控制麻疹方面已取得全球性进展,但在世界许多地区,实现消除目标仍颇具挑战。中国已制定了消除麻疹的目标,但最近的疫情主要影响 8 个月以下、不符合疫苗接种条件且无法完全通过母体抗体得到保护的儿童,这阻碍了进展。我们评估了在中国将麻疹初始疫苗接种剂量提前至 8 个月龄之前的成本效益。
我们进行了一项成本效益分析,比较了在 4、5、6 或 7 个月时将麻疹疫苗接种剂量添加到常规免疫程序与目前推荐的 8 个月龄时接种第一剂疫苗的成本和健康效益。在 Microsoft Excel 中开发了一个决策分析模型,包括与麻疹感染相关的五种非严重和两种致命健康结果。模型参数由文献和监测数据提供。未来成本和健康效益以 3%贴现。主要结果包括终生时间范围内的成本、质量调整生命年 (QALY) 和增量成本效益比 (ICER)。
将启动麻疹疫苗接种系列的推荐年龄降低至 8 个月以下,以解决 8 个月以下儿童的易感性问题,与个人层面的最小成本相比,提供了额外的健康收益。由于将麻疹接种转移到中国免疫计划下已经建立的免疫接种访视,初始剂量在 4 个月龄接种时,计划成本的增量最小,增量成本效益比 (ICER) 最有利(每获得一个 QALY 增加 232.70 美元)。
我们发现,在中国,在 8 个月以下的儿童中提前接种麻疹疫苗具有潜在的有益健康收益,且成本最低。需要进一步调查疾病传播动态,以更全面地评估在中国为婴儿接种更早的麻疹疫苗的权衡取舍。