• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国烟草控制政策对青少年吸烟率不平等的影响:一项自然实验研究。

Impact of UK Tobacco Control Policies on Inequalities in Youth Smoking Uptake: A Natural Experiment Study.

机构信息

MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Global Digital Health Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(11):1973-1980. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa101.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntaa101
PMID:32469404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7593354/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

UK countries implemented smoke-free public places legislation and increased the legal age for tobacco purchase from 16 to 18 years between 2006 and 2008. We evaluated the immediate and long-term impacts of these UK policy changes on youth smoking uptake and inequalities therein.

AIMS AND METHODS

We studied 74 960 person-years of longitudinal data from 14 992 youths (aged 11-15 years) in annual UK household surveys between 1994 and 2016. Discrete-time event history analyses examined whether changes in rates of youth smoking transitions (initiation, experimentation, and escalation to daily smoking or quitting) or their inequalities (by parental education) were associated with policy implementation. Parallel analyses examined smoke-free legislation and the change in legal age. We interpret the results as a combined effect of the two pieces of legislation as their implementation dates were too close to identify separate effects. Models were adjusted for sex, age, UK country, historical year, tobacco taxation, and e-cigarette prevalence, with multiple imputation for missing data.

RESULTS

For both policies, smoking initiation reduced following implementation (change in legal age odds ratio [OR]: 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55 to 0.81; smoke-free legislation OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.82), while inequalities in initiation narrowed over subsequent years. The legal age change was associated with annual increases in progression from initiation to occasional smoking (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.50) and a reduction in quitting following implementation (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.94). Similar effects were observed for smoke-free legislation but CIs overlapped the null.

CONCLUSIONS

Policies such as these may be highly effective in preventing and reducing socioeconomic inequalities in youth smoking initiation.

IMPLICATIONS

UK implementation of smoke-free legislation and an increase in the legal age for tobacco purchase from 16 to 18 years were associated with an immediate reduction in smoking initiation and a narrowing of inequalities in initiation over subsequent years. While the policies were associated with reductions in the initiation, progression to occasional smoking increased and quitting decreased following the legislation.

摘要

简介

2006 年至 2008 年间,英国各地区实施了无烟公共场所立法,并将购买烟草的法定年龄从 16 岁提高到 18 岁。我们评估了这些英国政策变化对青少年吸烟率及其不平等现象的即时和长期影响。

目的和方法

我们研究了 1994 年至 2016 年间,每年在英国家庭调查中对 14992 名 11-15 岁青少年进行的 74960 人年的纵向数据。离散时间事件历史分析检查了青少年吸烟转变率(开始吸烟、尝试吸烟和升级为每日吸烟或戒烟)的变化或其不平等(按父母教育水平)是否与政策实施有关。平行分析检查了无烟立法和法定年龄的变化。由于两项立法的实施日期太近,无法确定单独的影响,因此我们将结果解释为这两项立法的综合影响。模型调整了性别、年龄、英国地区、历史年份、烟草税和电子烟普及率,并对缺失数据进行了多重插补。

结果

对于这两项政策,实施后吸烟开始减少(法定年龄变化的优势比[OR]:0.67;95%置信区间[CI]:0.55 至 0.81;无烟立法 OR:0.68;95% CI:0.56 至 0.82),而吸烟开始的不平等现象在随后几年缩小。法定年龄的变化与从开始吸烟到偶尔吸烟的进展速度每年增加(OR:1.26;95% CI:1.07 至 1.50)以及实施后戒烟率降低(OR:0.57;95% CI:0.35 至 0.94)有关。无烟立法也观察到类似的效果,但置信区间与零值重叠。

结论

这些政策可能在预防和减少青少年吸烟开始的社会经济不平等方面非常有效。

意义

英国实施无烟立法和将购买烟草的法定年龄从 16 岁提高到 18 岁与随后几年吸烟开始率的立即降低以及开始率不平等现象的缩小有关。虽然这些政策与吸烟开始率的降低有关,但立法后偶尔吸烟的人数增加,戒烟人数减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2af/7593354/b9ca963fdbbf/ntaa101f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2af/7593354/63066013a05d/ntaa101f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2af/7593354/adc8ab47f05b/ntaa101f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2af/7593354/b9ca963fdbbf/ntaa101f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2af/7593354/63066013a05d/ntaa101f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2af/7593354/adc8ab47f05b/ntaa101f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2af/7593354/b9ca963fdbbf/ntaa101f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of UK Tobacco Control Policies on Inequalities in Youth Smoking Uptake: A Natural Experiment Study.英国烟草控制政策对青少年吸烟率不平等的影响:一项自然实验研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(11):1973-1980. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa101.
2
Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data.无烟公共场所立法对青少年吸烟率不平等现象的影响:英国调查数据二次分析的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 27;8(3):e022490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022490.
3
Socioeconomic position and early adolescent smoking development: evidence from the British Youth Panel Survey (1994-2008).社会经济地位与青少年早期吸烟行为发展:来自英国青年小组调查(1994 - 2008年)的证据
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):203-10. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051630. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
4
Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys.国家无烟立法对家庭禁烟的影响:来自国际烟草控制政策评估项目欧洲调查的结果。
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e2-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
5
Has Childhood Smoking Reduced Following Smoke-Free Public Places Legislation? A Segmented Regression Analysis of Cross-Sectional UK School-Based Surveys.无烟公共场所立法实施后儿童吸烟现象减少了吗?基于英国学校横断面调查的分段回归分析
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jul;18(7):1670-4. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw018. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
6
The impact of tobacco control policies on disparities in children's secondhand smoke exposure: a comparison of methods.烟草控制政策对儿童二手烟暴露差异的影响:方法比较。
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16 Suppl 1:S70-7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-0996-9.
7
Pathways of change explaining the effect of smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation in The Netherlands. An application of the international tobacco control conceptual model.解释无烟立法对荷兰戒烟效果的变化途径。国际烟草控制概念模型的应用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Dec;14(12):1474-82. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts081. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
8
Smoke-free legislation and neonatal and infant mortality in Brazil: longitudinal quasi-experimental study.无烟立法与巴西新生儿和婴儿死亡率:纵向准实验研究。
Tob Control. 2020 May;29(3):312-319. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054923. Epub 2019 May 31.
9
Impact of National Smoke-Free Legislation on Educational Disparities in Smoke-Free Homes: Findings from the SIDRIAT Longitudinal Study.国家无烟立法对无烟家庭中教育差距的影响:来自SIDRIAT纵向研究的结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jul 24;12(8):8705-16. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120808705.
10
Association of state tobacco control policies with active smoking at the time of intervention for intermittent claudication.州级烟草控制政策与间歇性跛行干预时的主动吸烟之间的关联。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1759-1768.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.156. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Vendor density mapping and compliance assessment with tobacco control laws around schools in Bhubaneswar City-a geo-spatial mapping and observational study.布巴内斯瓦尔市学校周边烟草控制法律的供应商密度测绘与合规评估——一项地理空间测绘与观察性研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 13;13:1410114. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1410114. eCollection 2025.
2
Multi-channel marketing exposure and psychoactive substance use in e-cigarettes: a cross-sectional study of Polish adolescents and young adults.多渠道营销曝光与电子烟中精神活性物质的使用:一项针对波兰青少年和青年成年人的横断面研究。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2025 Apr 23;38(2):190-206. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02532. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Have e-cigarettes renormalised or displaced youth smoking? Results of a segmented regression analysis of repeated cross sectional survey data in England, Scotland and Wales.电子烟是否使青少年吸烟正常化或取代了青少年吸烟?对英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士重复横断面调查数据的分段回归分析结果。
Tob Control. 2020 Mar;29(2):207-216. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054584. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
2
Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、区域和国家癌症发病率、死亡率、生命损失年数、失能生存年数以及 29 种癌症组别的伤残调整生命年数,1990 年至 2016 年:全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1553-1568. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706.
3
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.
一项关于解决吸烟行为的人群层面干预措施的系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Dec;8(12):2367-2391. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
Navigating the nexus between British Columbia's public consumption and decriminalization policies of illegal drugs.探索不列颠哥伦比亚省公共消费与非法药物非刑罪化政策之间的关联。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 May 23;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01150-6.
5
A cross-national comparison of the linkages between family structure histories and early adolescent substance use.跨国比较家庭结构历史与青少年早期物质使用之间的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;315:115540. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115540. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
6
Yet another reason we need to tackle socioeconomic inequalities in smoking.这也是我们需要解决吸烟方面社会经济不平等问题的另一个原因。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Sep 29;23:100520. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100520. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Trends in Deaths Attributable to Smoking in China, Japan, United Kingdom, and United States From 1990 to 2019.1990 年至 2019 年中国、日本、英国和美国归因于吸烟的死亡趋势。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;67:1605147. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1605147. eCollection 2022.
8
Smoking in social housing among adults in England, 2015-2020: a nationally representative survey.2015-2020 年英格兰社会住房中成年人的吸烟情况:一项全国代表性调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 26;12(7):e061013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061013.
9
Inequalities in Smoking and Quitting-Related Outcomes Among Adults With and Without Children in the Household 2013-2019: A Population Survey in England.2013-2019 年英国家庭中有无子女的成年人吸烟和戒烟相关结果的不平等:一项人口调查。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 26;24(5):690-698. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab211.
TIDieR-PHP: a reporting guideline for population health and policy interventions.TIDieR-PHP:人群健康与政策干预报告指南。
BMJ. 2018 May 16;361:k1079. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1079.
4
Impacts of smoke-free public places legislation on inequalities in youth smoking uptake: study protocol for a secondary analysis of UK survey data.无烟公共场所立法对青少年吸烟率不平等现象的影响:英国调查数据二次分析的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 27;8(3):e022490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022490.
5
Smoke-free policy and child health.无烟政策与儿童健康。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Sep;2(9):e392-e393. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30169-X. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
6
Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.烟草控制政策对围产期和儿童健康的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Sep 5;2(9):e420-e437. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30144-5. eCollection 2017 Sep.
7
Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990-2015 年 195 个国家和地区的吸烟流行率和可归因疾病负担:来自 2015 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1885-1906. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30819-X. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research.自然实验:方法、途径及其对公共卫生干预研究贡献的概述
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:39-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044327. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
9
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
10
Has Childhood Smoking Reduced Following Smoke-Free Public Places Legislation? A Segmented Regression Analysis of Cross-Sectional UK School-Based Surveys.无烟公共场所立法实施后儿童吸烟现象减少了吗?基于英国学校横断面调查的分段回归分析
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jul;18(7):1670-4. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw018. Epub 2016 Feb 24.