• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能家居信任度:来自英国全国代表性调查的发现。

Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK.

机构信息

Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, United Kingdom.

Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0231615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231615. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0231615
PMID:32469883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7259745/
Abstract

Businesses in the smart home sector are actively promoting the benefits of smart home technologies for consumers, such as convenience, economy and home security. To better understand meanings of and trust in the smart home, we carried out a nationally representative survey of UK consumers designed to measure adoption and acceptability, focusing on awareness, ownership, experience, trust, satisfaction and intention to use. We analysed the results using theories of meanings and acceptability of technologies including semiotics, social construction of technology (SCOT) and sociotechnical affordance. Our findings suggest that the meaning and value proposition of the smart home have not yet achieved closure for consumers, but is already foregrounding risks to privacy and security amongst the other meaning-making possibilities it could afford. Anxiety about the likelihood of a security incident emerges as a prominent factor influencing adoption of smart home technology. This factor negatively impacts adoption. These findings underline how businesses and policymakers will need to work together to act on the sociotechnical affordances of smart home technology in order to increase consumers' trust. This intervention is necessary if barriers to adoption and acceptability of the smart home are to be addressed now and in the future.

摘要

智能家居行业的企业积极向消费者宣传智能家居技术的好处,例如便利性、经济性和家庭安全性。为了更好地理解智能家居的含义和信任,我们对英国消费者进行了一项全国代表性调查,旨在衡量采用和接受度,重点关注意识、所有权、经验、信任、满意度和使用意向。我们使用包括符号学、技术的社会建构(SCOT)和社会技术赋权在内的技术含义和可接受性理论来分析结果。我们的研究结果表明,智能家居的含义和价值主张尚未为消费者所确定,但已经突显了隐私和安全风险,以及它可能带来的其他意义建构可能性。对安全事件发生可能性的担忧成为影响智能家居技术采用的一个突出因素。这个因素对采用产生了负面影响。这些发现强调了企业和政策制定者将需要共同努力,利用智能家居技术的社会技术赋权,以增加消费者的信任。如果要解决现在和未来智能家居采用和接受度的障碍,这种干预是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b46f/7259745/3191137ba8d1/pone.0231615.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b46f/7259745/191491a309e5/pone.0231615.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b46f/7259745/613a62e86f29/pone.0231615.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b46f/7259745/7bf8dcaf8b62/pone.0231615.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b46f/7259745/3191137ba8d1/pone.0231615.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b46f/7259745/191491a309e5/pone.0231615.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b46f/7259745/613a62e86f29/pone.0231615.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b46f/7259745/7bf8dcaf8b62/pone.0231615.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b46f/7259745/3191137ba8d1/pone.0231615.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK.智能家居信任度:来自英国全国代表性调查的发现。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0231615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231615. eCollection 2020.
2
Smart Home-based IoT for Real-time and Secure Remote Health Monitoring of Triage and Priority System using Body Sensors: Multi-driven Systematic Review.基于智能家居的物联网,利用身体传感器实现分诊和优先级系统的实时安全远程健康监测:多驱动系统评价。
J Med Syst. 2019 Jan 15;43(3):42. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1158-z.
3
Privacy and senior willingness to adopt smart home information technology in residential care facilities.隐私与老年居民在养老机构采用智能家居信息技术的意愿
Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(1):76-81. doi: 10.3414/me9104.
4
A study on smart home use intention of elderly consumers based on technology acceptance models.基于技术接受模型的老年消费者智能家居使用意愿研究
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 27;19(3):e0300574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300574. eCollection 2024.
5
What Influences the Perceived Trust of a Voice-Enabled Smart Home System: An Empirical Study.影响语音智能家庭系统感知信任的因素:一项实证研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 13;21(6):2037. doi: 10.3390/s21062037.
6
Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities.对智能家居技术的需求:持续照料退休社区中老年人的观点
Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(3):195-201. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v16i3.694.
7
Factors that predict the acceptance and adoption of smart home technology by seniors in Australia: a structural equation model with longitudinal data.预测澳大利亚老年人接受和采用智能家居技术的因素:具有纵向数据的结构方程模型。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2023 Jan 2;48(1):80-94. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2022.2069028. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
8
Trust, Perceived Risk, Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness as Factors Related to mHealth Technology Use.信任、感知风险、感知易用性和感知有用性作为与移动健康技术使用相关的因素。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:467-71.
9
Trust Me, I'm a Doctor: Examining Changes in How Privacy Concerns Affect Patient Withholding Behavior.相信我,我是医生:审视隐私担忧影响患者隐瞒行为方式的变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 4;19(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6296.
10
Senior citizens' acceptance of connected health technologies in their homes.老年人对家中联网健康技术的接受度。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Oct 14;32(8):1162-1174. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2018-0240.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Value Tensions in the Design of Technologies to Support Older Persons (AgeTech) Using Responsible Research and Innovation and Value Sensitive Design.运用负责任的研究与创新及价值敏感设计来应对支持老年人技术(老年科技)设计中的价值冲突
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Jul 1;31(4):17. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00541-4.
2
Smart Home Advancements for Health Care and Beyond: Systematic Review of Two Decades of User-Centric Innovation.医疗保健及其他领域的智能家居进展:对二十年以用户为中心创新的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 20;27:e62793. doi: 10.2196/62793.
3
The smart home, a true home? How new technologies disrupt the experience of home for older persons.

本文引用的文献

1
A longitudinal analysis of the public perception of the opportunities and challenges of the Internet of Things.物联网的机遇与挑战的公众认知的纵向分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0209472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209472. eCollection 2018.
2
Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review.社区居住的轻度认知障碍和痴呆老年人使用技术的可用性和可接受性:系统文献回顾。
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 May 4;13:863-886. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S154717. eCollection 2018.
3
Usability and acceptability by a younger and older user group regarding a mobile robot-supported gait rehabilitation system.
智能家居,真正的家?新技术如何扰乱老年人的居家体验。
Univers Access Inf Soc. 2025;24(1):897-910. doi: 10.1007/s10209-024-01114-1. Epub 2024 May 4.
4
Human and digital ecosystems in the modern household.现代家庭中的人类与数字生态系统。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 6;15:1426804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1426804. eCollection 2024.
5
When concentrated disadvantage happens: Exploring the nexus of energy and internet insecurities among vulnerable households.当集中性劣势出现时:探寻弱势群体家庭中能源与网络不安全因素之间的联系。
iScience. 2024 May 3;27(6):109895. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109895. eCollection 2024 Jun 21.
6
Intent to purchase IoT home security devices: Fear vs privacy.购买物联网家庭安全设备的意图:恐惧与隐私。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 21;16(9):e0257601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257601. eCollection 2021.
7
What Influences the Perceived Trust of a Voice-Enabled Smart Home System: An Empirical Study.影响语音智能家庭系统感知信任的因素:一项实证研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 13;21(6):2037. doi: 10.3390/s21062037.
8
Smart@home - supporting safety and mobility of elderly and care dependent people in their own homes through the use of technical assistance systems and conventional mobility supporting tools: a cross-sectional survey.智能家居 - 通过使用技术辅助系统和传统的行动辅助工具,为居家的老年人和需要护理的人群提供安全和行动能力支持:一项横断面调查。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02118-9.
年轻和老年用户群体对移动机器人辅助步态康复系统的可用性和可接受性。
Assist Technol. 2019;31(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1352051. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
4
Understanding logistic regression analysis.理解逻辑回归分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014 Feb 15;24(1):12-8. doi: 10.11613/BM.2014.003. eCollection 2014.
5
Multivariate or multivariable regression?多元回归还是多变量回归?
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):39-40. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300897. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
6
Diffusion of Technology: Frequency of Use for Younger and Older Adults.技术传播:年轻人和老年人的使用频率
Ageing Int. 2011 Mar;36(1):123-145. doi: 10.1007/s12126-010-9077-9.
7
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.对自动化的信任:设计适度的依赖。
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
8
A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes.个体技术采用决策过程中性别差异的纵向实地调查。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Sep;83(1):33-60. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2896.