Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 May 29;15(10):1467-1475. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0963.
Although skin-temperature assessment has received much attention in recent years as a possible internal-load measurement, scientific evidence is scarce.
To analyze baseline skin temperature and its rewarming through means of a cold-stress test before and after performing a marathon and to study the association between skin temperature and internal/external-load measurements.
A total of 16 runners were measured 48 and 24 h before and 24 and 48 h after completing a marathon. The measurements on each day of testing included urine biomarkers of oxidative stress, pain and fatigue perception, skin temperature (at baseline and after a cold-stress test), and jump performance.
Reduced jump performance (P < .01 and effect size [ES] = 0.5) and higher fatigue and pain perception were observed 24 h after the marathon (P < .01 and ES > 0.8). Although no differences in baseline skin temperature were observed between the 4 measuring days, posterior legs presented lower constant (P < .01 and ES = 1.4) and higher slope (P = .04 and ES = 1.1) parameters in the algorithmic equations fitted for skin-temperature recovery after the cold-stress test 24 h after the marathon than on the day before the marathon. Regressions showed that skin-temperature parameters could be predicted by the ratio of ortho-tyrosine isomer to phenylalanine (oxidative stress biomarker) and body fat composition, among others.
Although baseline skin temperature was not altered 24 or 48 h after a marathon, the application of cold stress after the marathon would appear to be a good method for providing information on vasoconstriction and a runner's state of stress.
尽管近年来皮肤温度评估作为一种可能的内部负荷测量方法受到了广泛关注,但科学证据仍然有限。
分析马拉松前后进行冷应激试验前后的基础皮肤温度及其复温情况,并研究皮肤温度与内部/外部负荷测量之间的关系。
共有 16 名跑步者在完成马拉松前 48 小时和 24 小时以及完成后 24 小时和 48 小时进行了测量。在测试的每一天,测量都包括尿液生物标志物的氧化应激、疼痛和疲劳感知、皮肤温度(基础体温和冷应激试验后)以及跳跃表现。
马拉松后 24 小时,跳跃表现下降(P<.01,效应量[ES] = 0.5),疲劳和疼痛感知增加(P<.01,ES>0.8)。尽管在 4 个测量日之间没有观察到基础皮肤温度的差异,但后腿在冷应激试验后 24 小时的算法方程拟合的皮肤温度恢复中呈现出较低的恒定(P<.01,ES = 1.4)和较高的斜率(P =.04,ES = 1.1)参数,比马拉松前一天更高。回归分析表明,皮肤温度参数可以通过邻酪氨酸异构体与苯丙氨酸的比值(氧化应激生物标志物)和体脂组成等因素进行预测。
尽管马拉松后 24 或 48 小时基础皮肤温度没有改变,但在马拉松后应用冷应激似乎是一种提供血管收缩和跑步者应激状态信息的好方法。