• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜切除术在高危直肠癌患者中的疗效。

Results of laparoscopic resection in high-risk rectal cancer patients.

机构信息

University of Portsmouth, School of Health and Care Professions, St Andrews Court, St Michael's road, Portsmouth, PO1 2PR, UK.

Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Longfleet road, Poole, BH15 2JB, UK.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Jun;405(4):479-490. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01892-1. Epub 2020 May 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-020-01892-1
PMID:32472173
Abstract

PURPOSE

Obesity, neoadjuvant-radiotherapy, tumour proximity to the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery are factors that might increase the intra-operative difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, whether patients with these 'high-risk' characteristics are subject to worse short- or long-term outcomes is debated. The aim of this study is to examine the short- and long-term clinical and oncological outcomes of patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery with any of these high-risk characteristics and compare them with patients that do not possess any of these high-risk features.

METHODS

For the purpose of this study data from consecutive patients receiving laparoscopic rectal cancer resections between 2006 and 2016 from two centres were analysed. High-risk patients were defined as patients with either one of the following characteristics: BMI ≥ 30, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, tumour < 8 cm from the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 313 patients were identified (227 high risk, 86 low risk). Short-term outcomes were similar between the two groups with the exception of blood loss and length of stay, which were higher in the high-risk group (10 vs 2.5 ml, p = 0.045; 7 vs 5 days, p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year overall survival (79.7% vs 79.8%, p = 0.757), disease-free survival (76.8% vs 69.3%, p = 0.175), distant disease-free interval (84.8% vs 79.7%, p = 0.231) and local recurrence-free interval (100%, 97.4%, p = 0.162) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Similar short- and long-term outcomes can be achieved in high-risk and low-risk patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery. The presented data support the suitability of laparoscopic surgery for this group of patients.

摘要

目的

肥胖、新辅助放疗、肿瘤距肛门边缘的距离以及既往腹部手术是可能增加腹腔镜直肠癌手术难度的因素。然而,这些“高危”特征的患者是否会出现短期或长期预后更差仍存在争议。本研究旨在检查接受任何一种高危特征的腹腔镜直肠手术的患者的短期和长期临床及肿瘤学结果,并将其与不具有任何高危特征的患者进行比较。

方法

为了进行这项研究,对来自两个中心的 2006 年至 2016 年间接受腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的连续患者的数据进行了分析。高危患者被定义为具有以下特征之一的患者:BMI≥30、新辅助放化疗、肿瘤距肛门边缘<8cm 和既往腹部手术。

结果

共确定了 313 名患者(227 名高危患者,86 名低危患者)。两组患者的短期结果相似,但高危组的出血量和住院时间较高(10 比 2.5ml,p=0.045;7 比 5 天,p=0.001)。两组患者的 5 年总生存率(79.7%比 79.8%,p=0.757)、无病生存率(76.8%比 69.3%,p=0.175)、远处无病间隔(84.8%比 79.7%,p=0.231)和局部无复发生存期(100%比 97.4%,p=0.162)均无统计学差异。

结论

接受腹腔镜直肠手术的高危和低危患者可获得相似的短期和长期结果。所提供的数据支持腹腔镜手术适用于这组患者。

相似文献

1
Results of laparoscopic resection in high-risk rectal cancer patients.腹腔镜切除术在高危直肠癌患者中的疗效。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Jun;405(4):479-490. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01892-1. Epub 2020 May 29.
2
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Elderly Patients with Rectal Cancer.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗老年直肠癌患者的结局比较。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Apr 1;22(4):1325-1329. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.4.1325.
3
Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期及肿瘤学结局比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2798-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
4
[Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):377-383. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190401-00135.
5
Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的近期和远期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Aug;55(8):854-63. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825b9052.
6
Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?机器人能否克服肥胖相关的直肠癌微创手术局限性?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Feb;28(1):e8-e11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000500.
7
The effect of increasing body mass index on laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer.体重指数增加对结肠癌和直肠癌腹腔镜手术的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20(9):778-788. doi: 10.1111/codi.14107. Epub 2018 May 4.
8
Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients.机器人与腹腔镜直肠手术治疗高危患者的比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;19(12):1092-1099. doi: 10.1111/codi.13783.
9
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗II期和III期直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5505-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505.
10
Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study.与腹腔镜手术相比,肥胖患者的机器人直肠癌手术可能会带来更好的短期疗效:一项倾向性评分匹配比较研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Aug;33(8):1079-1086. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3030-x. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Modified serial techniques "ASTRO" facilitated laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for ultralow-lying rectal cancer in obese male patients: how we do it (with video).改良的连续技术“ASTRO”助力肥胖男性患者超低位直肠癌的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术:我们的做法(附视频)
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 18;408(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02801-y.
2
Spotlight on laparoscopy in the surgical resection of locally advanced rectal cancer: multicenter propensity score match study.腹腔镜手术在局部晚期直肠癌手术切除中的应用:多中心倾向评分匹配研究
Ann Coloproctol. 2022 Aug;38(4):307-313. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.01060.0151. Epub 2021 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Modular approach for single docking robotic colorectal surgery.单对接机器人结直肠手术的模块化方法。
J Vis Surg. 2016 Jun 24;2:109. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2016.06.07. eCollection 2016.
2
BMI as a Predictor for Perioperative Outcome of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: a Pooled Analysis of Comparative Studies.BMI作为腹腔镜结直肠手术围手术期结局的预测指标:比较研究的汇总分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Apr;60(4):433-445. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000760.
3
The HARM score for gastrointestinal surgery: Application and validation of a novel, reliable and simple tool to measure surgical quality and outcomes.
胃肠道手术的HARM评分:一种用于衡量手术质量和结果的新型、可靠且简单工具的应用与验证
Am J Surg. 2017 Mar;213(3):575-578. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
Assessing the Gold Standard--Lessons from the History of RCTs.评估金标准——随机对照试验历史的教训
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 2;374(22):2175-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1604593.
5
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放手术切除直肠癌对病理结局的影响:ALA-CART 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009.
6
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助切除术与开放性切除术治疗Ⅱ期或Ⅲ期直肠癌对病理结果的影响:美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组Z6051随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1346-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529.
7
Impact of visceral obesity on outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis.内脏肥胖对腹腔镜结直肠手术结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;85(7-8):507-13. doi: 10.1111/ans.13132. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
8
Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的规范化:一项结构化的国际专家共识。
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):716-22. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000823.
9
Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.新辅助放化疗后中低位直肠肿瘤的开腹与腹腔镜手术比较(COREAN 试验):一项开放标签、非劣效、随机对照临床试验的生存结局。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):767-74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0. Epub 2014 May 15.
10
Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL.多中心随机对照试验:在强化康复方案中比较常规手术与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌:EnROL 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 10;32(17):1804-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.3694. Epub 2014 May 5.