Suppr超能文献

哪个 SLE 活动指数最适合临床试验?

Which is the best SLE activity index for clinical trials?

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2021 Jan;31(1):20-28. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1775928. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Abstract

Following the advent of molecular targeted drugs, a paradigm shift in treatment similar to that in rheumatoid arthritis has been expected in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but clinical trials for drugs that many specialists believed to be effective have failed repeatedly. The causes are not simple, but include the heterogeneity of SLE, inclusion criteria, lack of appropriate disease activity measures, and relapse criteria. This review outlines the disease activity indices used in SLE, discusses their advantages and disadvantages, and describes the ideal activity index.

摘要

随着分子靶向药物的出现,人们曾期望在治疗系统性红斑狼疮 (SLE) 方面出现类似于类风湿关节炎的治疗范式转变,但许多专家认为有效的药物临床试验却屡屡失败。原因并不简单,包括 SLE 的异质性、纳入标准、缺乏适当的疾病活动度测量指标以及复发标准。本文概述了 SLE 中使用的疾病活动指数,讨论了它们的优缺点,并描述了理想的活动指数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验