Division of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Center for Cell Signaling, Metabolism & Aging, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine (CBmed), Graz, Austria; Health Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences, Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Graz, Austria; BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2020;354:231-259. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
Dietary interventions combined with cancer drugs represent a clinically valid polytherapy. In particular nutrient restriction (NR) in the form of varied fasting or caloric restriction regimens holds great clinical promise, conceptually due to the voracious anabolic appetite of cancer cells. This metabolic dependency is driven by a strong selective pressure to increasingly acquire biomass of a proliferating tumor and can be therapeutically exploited as vulnerability. A host of preclinical data suggest that NR can potentiate the efficacy of, or alleviate resistance to, cancer drugs. However, complicating clinical implementation are the many variables involved, such as host biology, cancer stage and type, oncogenic mutation landscape, tumor heterogeneity, variations in treatment modalities, and patient compliance to NR protocols. This calls for systematic preclinical screens and co-clinical studies to predict effective combinations of NR with cancer drugs and to allow for patient stratification regarding responsiveness to polytherapy. Such screen-and-stratify pipelines should consider tumor heterogeneity as well as the role of immune effectors in the tumor microenvironment and may lead to biomarker discovery advancing the oncology field toward personalized options with improved translatability to clinical settings. This opinion-based review provides a critical overview of recent literature investigating NR for cancer treatment, pinpoints limitations of current studies, and suggests standardizations and refinements for future studies and trials. The proposed measures aim to increase the translational value of preclinical data and effectively harness the vast potential of NR as adjuvant for cancer therapy.
饮食干预与癌症药物相结合代表了一种临床有效的联合治疗。特别是以不同形式的禁食或热量限制方案进行营养限制(NR),具有很大的临床应用前景,这在概念上是由于癌细胞贪婪的合成代谢需求。这种代谢依赖性是由肿瘤增殖过程中不断获取生物量的强烈选择性压力驱动的,并且可以作为脆弱性被治疗性地利用。大量的临床前数据表明,NR 可以增强癌症药物的疗效或减轻其耐药性。然而,临床实施的复杂性在于涉及的许多变量,如宿主生物学、癌症分期和类型、致癌突变景观、肿瘤异质性、治疗方式的变化以及患者对 NR 方案的依从性。这需要进行系统的临床前筛选和联合临床研究,以预测 NR 与癌症药物的有效联合,并允许对患者进行分层,以确定对联合治疗的反应性。这种筛选和分层的方法应考虑肿瘤异质性以及肿瘤微环境中免疫效应器的作用,并可能导致生物标志物的发现,从而推动肿瘤学领域朝着个性化选择方向发展,提高向临床环境转化的能力。本综述文章基于观点提供了对最近研究 NR 治疗癌症的文献的批判性概述,指出了当前研究的局限性,并提出了未来研究和试验的标准化和改进建议。拟议的措施旨在提高临床前数据的转化价值,并有效地利用 NR 作为癌症治疗辅助剂的巨大潜力。