Yang Ming-Da, Leghari Shah Jahan, Guan Xiao-Kang, Ma Shou-Chen, Ding Chao-Ming, Mei Fu-Jian, Wei Li, Wang Tong-Chao
Collaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops, College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 May 6;11:508. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00508. eCollection 2020.
Understanding the temporal and spatial patterns of soil water extraction and their impacts on growth response of winter wheat to deficit subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) conditions is critical for managing water scarcity and stabilizing yield. A field experiment was conducted from 2016 to 2018 involving five SDI amounts: 0.25, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 ETc, representing 25, 40, 60, 80, and 100% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc), respectively. The results showed that the 0.6 ETc treatment significantly increased soil water extraction from 40-80 and 80-140-cm from jointing to maturity as compared to the 1.0 ETc treatment. Whereas the 0.8 ETc treatment significantly increased soil water extraction from 80-140-cm deep soil from flowering to maturity in the first growing season. The crop was most water-stressed under the 0.25 and 0.4 ETc treatments, thus extracted more soil water from 0-140-cm soil profile. However, both treatments exhibited minimum plant tillers, lowest leaf water content, leaf area index (LAI), photosynthetic rate ( ), and transpiration rate ( ) as well as grain yield. All these parameters, except for leaf water content, after the flowering stage, and grain productivity, were also reduced in the 0.6 ETc treatment than the 1.0 ETc treatment. The differences between the 0.8 and 1.0 ETc treatments were minor in terms of plant height, LAI, spike number, and , but infertile tillers were fewer in the 0.8 ETc treatment. We obtained high yield from the 0.8 ETc treatment, and the 0.6ETc treatment resulted in the highest harvest index with improved WUE than other treatments. Integrating deficit irrigation into SDI can save water in winter wheat production in water-limited regions, which can not only enhance soil water extraction from deep soil layers, but also sustained yield by stimulating crop growth. Therefore, a deficit SDI system would be used to conserve water in water-limited regions.
了解冬小麦在亏缺式地下滴灌(SDI)条件下土壤水分提取的时空模式及其对生长响应的影响,对于管理水资源短缺和稳定产量至关重要。2016年至2018年进行了一项田间试验,涉及五种SDI量:0.25、0.4、0.6、0.8和1.0 ETc,分别代表作物蒸散量(ETc)的25%、40%、60%、80%和100%。结果表明,与1.0 ETc处理相比,0.6 ETc处理显著增加了从拔节到成熟阶段40 - 80厘米和80 - 140厘米土层的土壤水分提取量。而在第一个生长季,0.8 ETc处理显著增加了开花到成熟阶段80 - 140厘米深层土壤的水分提取量。在0.25和0.4 ETc处理下,作物水分胁迫最为严重,因此从0 - 140厘米土壤剖面中提取了更多的土壤水分。然而,这两种处理的分蘖数最少、叶片含水量最低、叶面积指数(LAI)、光合速率( )和蒸腾速率( )以及籽粒产量均最低。除开花期后的叶片含水量外,0.6 ETc处理的所有这些参数以及籽粒生产力均低于1.0 ETc处理。0.8和1.0 ETc处理在株高、LAI、穗数、 和 方面差异较小,但0.8 ETc处理的无效分蘖较少。我们从0.8 ETc处理中获得了高产,0.6 ETc处理的收获指数最高,水分利用效率(WUE)比其他处理有所提高。将亏缺灌溉与SDI相结合可以在水资源有限的地区节约冬小麦生产用水,这不仅可以增强深层土壤的水分提取,还可以通过刺激作物生长来维持产量。因此,亏缺式SDI系统将用于水资源有限地区的节水。