• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement.多性状基因组选择方法在作物改良中的应用。
Genetics. 2020 Aug;215(4):931-945. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303305. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
2
Genomic structural equation modelling provides a whole-system approach for the future crop breeding.基因组结构方程建模为未来的作物育种提供了一种整体系统的方法。
Theor Appl Genet. 2021 Sep;134(9):2875-2889. doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03865-4. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials.多环境作物试验中的基因组选择
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 May 3;6(5):1313-26. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.027524.
4
Application of multi-trait Bayesian decision theory for parental genomic selection.多性状贝叶斯决策理论在亲本基因组选择中的应用。
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Feb 9;11(2). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab012.
5
High-throughput phenotyping and genomic selection: the frontiers of crop breeding converge.高通量表型分析和基因组选择:作物育种的前沿正在交汇。
J Integr Plant Biol. 2012 May;54(5):312-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01116.x.
6
Sequencing depth and genotype quality: accuracy and breeding operation considerations for genomic selection applications in autopolyploid crops.测序深度和基因型质量:在同源多倍体作物基因组选择应用中的准确性和育种操作考虑因素。
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 Dec;133(12):3345-3363. doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03673-2. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
7
Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction of Yield-Related Traits in US Soft Wheat under Variable Water Regimes.在不同水分条件下美国软小麦产量相关性状的多性状基因组预测。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Oct 28;11(11):1270. doi: 10.3390/genes11111270.
8
The L-shaped selection algorithm for multitrait genomic selection.用于多性状基因组选择的L形选择算法。
Genetics. 2022 Jul 4;221(3). doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac069.
9
Optimizing Selection and Mating in Genomic Selection with a Look-Ahead Approach: An Operations Research Framework.基于前瞻方法的基因组选择中选择和交配的优化:一个运筹学框架。
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Jul 9;9(7):2123-2133. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200842.
10
Multi-trait Improvement by Predicting Genetic Correlations in Breeding Crosses.通过预测杂交育种中的遗传相关性进行多性状改良。
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Oct 7;9(10):3153-3165. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400406.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic selection: Essence, applications, and prospects.基因组选择:本质、应用与前景。
Plant Genome. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70053. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.70053.
2
Integer programming as a powerful tool for polyclonal selection in ancient grapevine varieties.整数规划作为古代葡萄品种多克隆选择的强大工具。
Theor Appl Genet. 2025 May 21;138(6):122. doi: 10.1007/s00122-025-04885-0.
3
MtCro: multi-task deep learning framework improves multi-trait genomic prediction of crops.MtCro:多任务深度学习框架改进了作物的多性状基因组预测。
Plant Methods. 2025 Feb 5;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01321-0.
4
Comparative Study of Single-Trait and Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction Models.单性状与多性状基因组预测模型的比较研究
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;14(20):2961. doi: 10.3390/ani14202961.
5
Hybrid Prediction in Horticulture Crop Breeding: Progress and Challenges.园艺作物育种中的杂交预测:进展与挑战
Plants (Basel). 2024 Oct 4;13(19):2790. doi: 10.3390/plants13192790.
6
Genomic estimated selection criteria and parental contributions in parent selection increase genetic gain of maternal haploid inducers in maize.在玉米中,通过基因组估计选择标准和亲本贡献来选择亲本,可以增加母本单倍体诱导剂的遗传增益。
Theor Appl Genet. 2024 Oct 6;137(11):248. doi: 10.1007/s00122-024-04744-4.
7
PyBrOpS: a Python package for breeding program simulation and optimization for multi-objective breeding.PyBrOpS:一个用于多目标育种模拟和优化的 Python 包。
G3 (Bethesda). 2024 Oct 7;14(10). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae199.
8
Linking genetic markers and crop model parameters using neural networks to enhance genomic prediction of integrative traits.利用神经网络将遗传标记与作物模型参数相联系,以增强综合性状的基因组预测。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jul 30;15:1393965. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1393965. eCollection 2024.
9
SCAG: A Stratified, Clustered, and Growing-Based Algorithm for Soybean Branch Angle Extraction and Ideal Plant Architecture Evaluation.SCAG:一种用于大豆分枝角度提取和理想株型评估的分层、聚类和基于生长的算法。
Plant Phenomics. 2024 Jul 23;6:0190. doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0190. eCollection 2024.
10
Development and optimization of expected cross value for mate selection problems.预期交叉值在伴侣选择问题中的发展与优化。
Heredity (Edinb). 2024 Aug;133(2):113-125. doi: 10.1038/s41437-024-00697-y. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing Selection and Mating in Genomic Selection with a Look-Ahead Approach: An Operations Research Framework.基于前瞻方法的基因组选择中选择和交配的优化:一个运筹学框架。
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Jul 9;9(7):2123-2133. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200842.
2
Multi-objective optimized genomic breeding strategies for sustainable food improvement.多目标优化的基因组育种策略,以实现可持续的粮食改良。
Heredity (Edinb). 2019 May;122(5):672-683. doi: 10.1038/s41437-018-0147-1. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
3
Empirical Comparisons of Different Statistical Models To Identify and Validate Kernel Row Number-Associated Variants from Structured Multi-parent Mapping Populations of Maize.不同统计模型的实证比较,以从玉米结构化多亲本作图群体中鉴定和验证与穗行数相关的变异体。
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Nov 6;8(11):3567-3575. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200636.
4
Distinct genetic architectures for phenotype means and plasticities in Zea mays.玉米表型均值和可塑性的独特遗传结构。
Nat Plants. 2017 Sep;3(9):715-723. doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0007-7. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
5
Improving Response in Genomic Selection with a Population-Based Selection Strategy: Optimal Population Value Selection.采用基于群体的选择策略提高基因组选择中的响应:最优群体值选择
Genetics. 2017 Jul;206(3):1675-1682. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.197103. Epub 2017 May 19.
6
Efficient Breeding by Genomic Mating.基因组选配的高效育种
Front Genet. 2016 Nov 29;7:210. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00210. eCollection 2016.
7
Selection on Optimal Haploid Value Increases Genetic Gain and Preserves More Genetic Diversity Relative to Genomic Selection.相对于基因组选择,对最优单倍体值进行选择可增加遗传增益并保留更多遗传多样性。
Genetics. 2015 Aug;200(4):1341-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178038. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets.第二代PLINK:应对更大、更丰富数据集的挑战
Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8. eCollection 2015.
9
Beyond missing heritability: prediction of complex traits.超越遗传缺失:复杂性状的预测。
PLoS Genet. 2011 Apr;7(4):e1002051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002051. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
10
A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.针对三联体和无关个体的大型数据集进行基因型填充和单倍型相位推断的统一方法。
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Feb;84(2):210-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Feb 5.

多性状基因组选择方法在作物改良中的应用。

Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering and.

Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010.

出版信息

Genetics. 2020 Aug;215(4):931-945. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303305. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1534/genetics.120.303305
PMID:32482640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7404246/
Abstract

Plant breeders make selection decisions based on multiple traits, such as yield, plant height, flowering time, and disease resistance. A commonly used approach in multi-trait genomic selection is index selection, which assigns weights to different traits relative to their economic importance. However, classical index selection only optimizes genetic gain in the next generation, requires some experimentation to find weights that lead to desired outcomes, and has difficulty optimizing nonlinear breeding objectives. Multi-objective optimization has also been used to identify the Pareto frontier of selection decisions, which represents different trade-offs across multiple traits. We propose a new approach, which maximizes certain traits while keeping others within desirable ranges. Optimal selection decisions are made using a new version of the look-ahead selection (LAS) algorithm, which was recently proposed for single-trait genomic selection, and achieved superior performance with respect to other state-of-the-art selection methods. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method, a case study is developed using a realistic data set where our method is compared with conventional index selection. Results suggest that the multi-trait LAS is more effective at balancing multiple traits compared with index selection.

摘要

植物育种者根据多个性状做出选择决策,例如产量、株高、开花时间和抗病性。在多性状基因组选择中,常用的方法是指数选择,它根据性状的经济重要性为不同性状分配权重。然而,经典的指数选择仅优化了下一代的遗传增益,需要进行一些实验来找到导致期望结果的权重,并且难以优化非线性育种目标。多目标优化也已被用于确定选择决策的帕累托前沿,该前沿代表了多个性状之间的不同权衡。我们提出了一种新方法,该方法在保持其他性状在理想范围内的同时最大化某些性状。使用最近为单性状基因组选择提出的一种新版本的前瞻性选择(LAS)算法来做出最佳选择决策,并且在其他最先进的选择方法方面表现出卓越的性能。为了证明新方法的有效性,使用一个现实数据集进行了案例研究,其中将我们的方法与传统的指数选择进行了比较。结果表明,与指数选择相比,多性状 LAS 更有效地平衡多个性状。