Goiffon Matthew, Kusmec Aaron, Wang Lizhi, Hu Guiping, Schnable Patrick S
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Genetics. 2017 Jul;206(3):1675-1682. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.197103. Epub 2017 May 19.
Genomic selection (GS) identifies individuals for inclusion in breeding programs based on the sum of their estimated marker effects or genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs). Due to significant correlation between GEBVs and true breeding values, this has resulted in enhanced rates of genetic gain as compared to traditional methods of selection. Three extensions to GS, weighted genomic selection (WGS), optimal haploid value (OHV) selection, and genotype building (GB) selection have been proposed to improve long-term response, and to facilitate the efficient development of doubled haploids. In separate simulation studies, these methods were shown to outperform GS under various assumptions. However, further potential for improvement exists. In this paper, optimal population value (OPV) selection is introduced as selection based on the maximum possible haploid value in a subset of the population. Instead of evaluating the breeding merit of individuals as in GS, WGS, and OHV selection, the proposed method evaluates the breeding merit of a set of individuals as in GB. After testing these selection methods extensively, OPV and GB selection were found to achieve greater responses than GS, WGS, and OHV, with OPV outperforming GB across most percentiles. These results suggest a new paradigm for selection methods in which an individual's value is dependent upon its complementarity with others.
基因组选择(GS)根据个体估计的标记效应总和或基因组估计育种值(GEBVs)来确定个体是否纳入育种计划。由于GEBVs与真实育种值之间存在显著相关性,与传统选择方法相比,这导致了遗传增益率的提高。为了提高长期响应并促进双单倍体的高效培育,人们提出了基因组选择的三种扩展方法,即加权基因组选择(WGS)、最优单倍体值(OHV)选择和基因型构建(GB)选择。在单独的模拟研究中,这些方法在各种假设下均表现优于基因组选择。然而,仍有进一步改进的潜力。本文引入最优群体值(OPV)选择,即基于群体子集中可能的最大单倍体值进行选择。与基因组选择、加权基因组选择和最优单倍体值选择中评估个体的育种价值不同,所提出的方法与基因型构建选择一样,评估一组个体的育种价值。在对这些选择方法进行广泛测试后,发现最优群体值选择和基因型构建选择比基因组选择、加权基因组选择和最优单倍体值选择能实现更大的响应,在大多数百分位数上最优群体值选择的表现优于基因型构建选择。这些结果为选择方法提出了一种新范式,即个体的价值取决于其与其他个体的互补性。