Department of Family Studies & Gerontology, Mount Saint Vincent University.
Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto.
Can J Aging. 2021 Mar;40(1):166-176. doi: 10.1017/S0714980820000057. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
This article examines provincial policy influence on long-term care (LTC) professionals' advice-seeking networks in Canada's Maritime provinces. The effects of facility ownership, geography, and region-specific political landscapes on LTC best-practice dissemination are examined. We used sociometric statistics and network sociograms, calculated from surveys with 169 senior leaders in LTC facilities, to identify advice-seeking network structures and to select 11 follow-up interview participants. Network structures were distinguished by density, sub-group number, opinion leader, and boundary spanner distribution. Network structure was affected by ownership model in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island, and by regional geography in New Brunswick. Political instability within each province's LTC system negatively affected network actors' capabilities to enact innovation. Moreover, provincial policy variations influence advice-seeking network structures, facilitating and constraining relationship development and networking. Consequently, local policy context is essential to informing dissemination strategy design or implementation.
本文考察了加拿大海洋省份的省级政策对长期护理(LTC)专业人员咨询网络的影响。检验了设施所有权、地理位置和特定地区政治格局对 LTC 最佳实践传播的影响。我们使用社会计量统计学和网络社会图,根据对 169 名 LTC 设施高级管理人员的调查进行计算,以确定咨询网络结构,并选择 11 名后续访谈参与者。网络结构的区别在于密度、子群数量、意见领袖和边界跨越者的分布。网络结构受到新斯科舍省和爱德华王子岛所有权模式的影响,以及新不伦瑞克省地域的影响。每个省的 LTC 系统内部的政治不稳定对网络参与者实施创新的能力产生负面影响。此外,省级政策的差异影响了咨询网络结构,促进和限制了关系的发展和网络的建立。因此,地方政策背景对于制定或实施传播策略至关重要。