Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Departamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, SP, Brasil.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020;53:e20190535. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0535-2019. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Since the early 20th century, the detection of intestinal parasites has improved with the development of several techniques for parasitic structures recovery and identification, which differ in sensitivity, specificity, practicality, cost, and infrastructure demand. This study aims to review, in chronological order, the stool examination techniques and discuss their advantages, limitations, and perspectives, and to provide professionals and specialists in this field with data that lays a foundation for critical analysis on the use of such procedures. The concentration procedures that constitute the main techniques applied in routine research and in parasitological kits are a) spontaneous sedimentation; b) centrifugation-sedimentation with formalin-ethyl acetate; and c) flotation with zinc sulfate solution. While selecting a technique, one should consider the purpose of its application and the technical-operational, biological, and physicochemical factors inherent in the procedures used in stool processing, which may restrict its use. These intrinsic limitations may have undergone procedural changes driven by scientific and technological development and by development of alternative methods, which now contribute to the improvement of diagnostic accuracy.
自 20 世纪初以来,随着几种寄生虫结构回收和鉴定技术的发展,肠道寄生虫的检测得到了改善,这些技术在灵敏度、特异性、实用性、成本和基础设施需求方面存在差异。本研究旨在按时间顺序回顾粪便检查技术,并讨论其优缺点和前景,为该领域的专业人员和专家提供数据,为批判性分析此类程序的使用奠定基础。构成常规研究和寄生虫学试剂盒中主要应用技术的浓缩程序是:a)自然沉淀;b)福尔马林-乙酸乙酯离心沉淀;c)硫酸锌溶液浮选。在选择技术时,应考虑其应用目的以及粪便处理过程中固有的技术操作、生物学和物理化学因素,这些因素可能会限制其使用。这些内在局限性可能已经发生了变化,这是由科学技术的发展以及替代方法的发展所驱动的,这些方法现在有助于提高诊断的准确性。