Botelho Maria José, Lima Christina A
J Nurs Educ. 2020 Jun 1;59(6):311-318. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200520-03.
Despite the development of cultural competence models in response to the increase in cultural diversity in the United States, health disparities based on ethnicity and cross-cultural mismatches in health care practices still exist.
This article critically reviews six noteworthy conceptual models of cultural competence and enlists multilayered definitions of culture from cultural anthropology, critical multicultural education, and critical literary theory, as well as critical discourse analytical tools to deconstruct these frameworks.
Although these models assist providers to become more culturally sensitive, they can essentialize and oversimplify patients' cultural experience, as well as mask the dynamism and complexities of their communities and power relations.
Competence implies that practitioners can master diverse cultural experiences. Building on some of the promising practices of these six models and the practices of cultural humility and relational ethics, processes and practices are proposed for practitioners to reconstruct their ongoing cross-cultural work in nursing. [J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(6):311-318.].
尽管美国针对文化多样性增加的情况制定了文化能力模型,但基于种族的健康差异以及医疗保健实践中的跨文化不匹配现象仍然存在。
本文批判性地回顾了六个值得关注的文化能力概念模型,并引用了文化人类学、批判性多元文化教育和批判性文学理论中对文化的多层次定义,以及用于解构这些框架的批判性话语分析工具。
尽管这些模型有助于医疗服务提供者提高文化敏感性,但它们可能会将患者的文化体验本质化和过度简化,同时掩盖其社区的动态性和复杂性以及权力关系。
能力意味着从业者能够掌握多样的文化体验。基于这六个模型的一些有前景的实践以及文化谦逊和关系伦理的实践,为从业者提出了在护理工作中重构其正在进行的跨文化工作的过程和实践。[《护理教育杂志》。2020年;59(6):311 - 318。]