Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Jul;29(7):1374-1380. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1616. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
Although there are considerable racial and ethnic disparities in prostate cancer incidence and mortality in the United States and globally, clinical trials often do not reflect disease incidence across racial and ethnic subgroups. This study aims to comprehensively review the reporting of race and ethnicity data and the representation of race and ethnicity across prostate cancer treatment-, prevention-, and screening-based clinical trials.
Seventy-two global phase III and IV prevention, screening, and treatment prostate cancer clinical trials with enrollment start dates between 1987 and 2016 were analyzed in this study, representing a total of 893,378 individual trial participants. Availability and representation of race and ethnicity data by trial funding type, temporal changes in the racial/ethnic diversity of participants, and geographic representation of countries were assessed.
Of the 72 trials analyzed, 59 (81.9%) had available race data, and 11 (15.3%) of these trials additionally reported ethnicity. Of the trials reporting data, participants were overwhelmingly white men (with the highest proportion in U.S. nonpublicly funded trials), comprising over 96% of the study population. The proportion of white participants in prostate cancer clinical trials has remained at over 80% since 1990. Geographically, Africa and the Caribbean were particularly underrepresented with only 3% of countries included.
Trial participants continue to be majority white despite the known racial disparities in prostate cancer clinical outcomes.
Current and future trials must use novel recruitment strategies to ensure enrollment of underrepresented men. Targeting the inclusion of African and Caribbean medical centers is crucial to achieve equity in representation.
尽管在美国和全球范围内,前列腺癌的发病率和死亡率存在相当大的种族和民族差异,但临床试验通常并不能反映不同种族和民族亚组的疾病发病率。本研究旨在全面审查种族和民族数据的报告情况,以及前列腺癌治疗、预防和筛查为基础的临床试验中种族和民族的代表性。
本研究分析了 72 项全球三期和四期预防、筛查和治疗前列腺癌临床试验,这些试验的入组日期在 1987 年至 2016 年之间,共涉及 893378 名个体试验参与者。评估了试验资金类型、参与者种族/民族多样性的时间变化以及国家的地域代表性对种族和民族数据的可用性和代表性。
在分析的 72 项试验中,59 项(81.9%)有可用的种族数据,其中 11 项(15.3%)试验还报告了民族数据。在报告数据的试验中,参与者绝大多数是白人男性(在美国非公开资助的试验中比例最高),占研究人群的 96%以上。自 1990 年以来,前列腺癌临床试验中白人参与者的比例一直保持在 80%以上。从地域上看,非洲和加勒比地区的代表性尤其不足,只有 3%的国家包括在内。
尽管前列腺癌临床结局存在明显的种族差异,但试验参与者仍以白人为主。
当前和未来的试验必须采用新的招募策略,以确保代表性不足的男性参与试验。将非洲和加勒比地区的医疗中心纳入试验是实现代表性公平的关键。