Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland.
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Dec;49(8):914-920. doi: 10.1177/1403494820919561. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
: The impact of indoor mould on employees' long-term absence from sickness (more than 10 days of absence) is poorly understood. This paper examines whether self-reported mould was related to long-term absences from work between 1 and 3 years later. : By using negative binomial modelling, we analysed a representative sample of the working-age population in Finland ( = 16,084) from the Finnish Quality of Work Life Surveys in 1997, 2003, 2008 and 2013 combined with the register-based follow-up data of participants' long-term sickness absences covering a period of 1 to 3 years after the Finnish Quality of Work Life Surveys was collected. : After all necessary background, work- and health-related factors were included in the model, employees who reported mould in their work had 1.20 higher rates of long-term sickness absence than those who did not report mould (mould: estimated marginal mean = 13.45 days; no mould: estimated marginal mean = 11.23). If employees perceived that mould caused strain, they had 1.30 higher rates of long-term absence than those who did not report such strain (mould caused strain: estimated marginal mean = 14.64 days; mould did not cause strain: estimated marginal mean = 11.25). In total, 10% (=1628) of employees reported mould in their workplace and 6% (=987) reported that mould caused strain. .
室内霉菌对员工长期病假(超过 10 天的缺勤)的影响知之甚少。本文研究了自我报告的霉菌是否与 1 至 3 年后的长期旷工有关。
通过使用负二项式模型,我们分析了芬兰工作年龄人群的代表性样本(n=16084),该样本来自芬兰工作生活质量调查(1997 年、2003 年、2008 年和 2013 年),并结合了参与者长期病假的登记后随访数据,这些数据涵盖了从芬兰工作生活质量调查收集后的 1 至 3 年。
在包括所有必要的背景、工作和健康相关因素后,报告工作场所存在霉菌的员工长期病假的发生率比未报告霉菌的员工高 1.20 倍(霉菌:估计边际均值=13.45 天;无霉菌:估计边际均值=11.23 天)。如果员工认为霉菌会造成压力,他们的长期缺勤率比未报告这种压力的员工高 1.30 倍(霉菌造成压力:估计边际均值=14.64 天;霉菌未造成压力:估计边际均值=11.25 天)。总的来说,10%(=1628)的员工报告工作场所存在霉菌,6%(=987)的员工报告霉菌造成压力。