• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习模型的降雨诱发滑坡预测:以卢旺达恩戈罗恩戈罗区为例。

Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: The Case of Ngororero District, Rwanda.

机构信息

African Centre of Excellence in Internet of Things, University of Rwanda, Kigali 3900, Rwanda.

School of ICT, The Copperbelt University, Kitwe 21692, Zambia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):4147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114147.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17114147
PMID:32532022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7312667/
Abstract

Landslides fall under natural, unpredictable and most distractive disasters. Hence, early warning systems of such disasters can alert people and save lives. Some of the recent early warning models make use of Internet of Things to monitor the environmental parameters to predict the disasters. Some other models use machine learning techniques (MLT) to analyse rainfall data along with some internal parameters to predict these hazards. The prediction capability of the existing models and systems are limited in terms of their accuracy. In this research paper, two prediction modelling approaches, namely random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR), are proposed. These approaches use rainfall datasets as well as various other internal and external parameters for landslide prediction and hence improve the accuracy. Moreover, the prediction performance of these approaches is further improved using antecedent cumulative rainfall data. These models are evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics, area under the curve (ROC-AUC) and false negative rate (FNR) to measure the landslide cases that were not reported. When antecedent rainfall data is included in the prediction, both models (RF and LR) performed better with an AUC of 0.995 and 0.997, respectively. The results proved that there is a good correlation between antecedent precipitation and landslide occurrence rather than between one-day rainfall and landslide occurrence. In terms of incorrect predictions, RF and LR improved FNR to 10.58% and 5.77% respectively. It is also noted that among the various internal factors used for prediction, slope angle has the highest impact than other factors. Comparing both the models, LR model's performance is better in terms of FNR and it could be preferred for landslide prediction and early warning. LR model's incorrect prediction rate FNR = 9.61% without including antecedent precipitation data and 3.84% including antecedent precipitation data.

摘要

滑坡属于自然发生、不可预测且极具干扰性的灾害。因此,此类灾害的早期预警系统可以提醒人们并拯救生命。一些最新的早期预警模型利用物联网监测环境参数以预测灾害。其他一些模型则使用机器学习技术 (MLT) 分析降雨量数据以及一些内部参数来预测这些灾害。现有模型和系统的预测能力在准确性方面受到限制。在本研究论文中,提出了两种预测建模方法,即随机森林 (RF) 和逻辑回归 (LR)。这些方法使用降雨数据集以及各种其他内部和外部参数进行滑坡预测,从而提高准确性。此外,还使用前期累积降雨数据进一步提高了这些方法的预测性能。使用接收者操作特征、曲线下面积 (ROC-AUC) 和假阴性率 (FNR) 来评估这些模型,以衡量未报告的滑坡情况。当包含前期降雨数据时,两种模型 (RF 和 LR) 的表现都更好,AUC 分别为 0.995 和 0.997。结果表明,前期降水与滑坡发生之间存在很好的相关性,而不是一天的降雨与滑坡发生之间的相关性。在错误预测方面,RF 和 LR 将 FNR 分别提高到 10.58%和 5.77%。还注意到,在用于预测的各种内部因素中,坡度角的影响比其他因素高。比较两种模型,LR 模型在 FNR 方面的性能更好,因此可以优先用于滑坡预测和预警。LR 模型的错误预测率 FNR = 9.61%,不包括前期降水数据,包括前期降水数据时为 3.84%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/83e47d35841f/ijerph-17-04147-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/3cb55ac2b479/ijerph-17-04147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/3cafaf4bcff3/ijerph-17-04147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/c9c9dceca273/ijerph-17-04147-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/0e8cba455595/ijerph-17-04147-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/9aeb698ad7a5/ijerph-17-04147-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/cf9d28a4fe6f/ijerph-17-04147-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/a5ee7f683715/ijerph-17-04147-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/47a508563f5d/ijerph-17-04147-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/0a8264fde5fa/ijerph-17-04147-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/f9e58f6d8377/ijerph-17-04147-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/950a0b3d9a21/ijerph-17-04147-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/e1256a805ca6/ijerph-17-04147-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/4429a756c44e/ijerph-17-04147-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/83e47d35841f/ijerph-17-04147-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/3cb55ac2b479/ijerph-17-04147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/3cafaf4bcff3/ijerph-17-04147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/c9c9dceca273/ijerph-17-04147-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/0e8cba455595/ijerph-17-04147-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/9aeb698ad7a5/ijerph-17-04147-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/cf9d28a4fe6f/ijerph-17-04147-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/a5ee7f683715/ijerph-17-04147-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/47a508563f5d/ijerph-17-04147-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/0a8264fde5fa/ijerph-17-04147-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/f9e58f6d8377/ijerph-17-04147-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/950a0b3d9a21/ijerph-17-04147-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/e1256a805ca6/ijerph-17-04147-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/4429a756c44e/ijerph-17-04147-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/7312667/83e47d35841f/ijerph-17-04147-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: The Case of Ngororero District, Rwanda.基于机器学习模型的降雨诱发滑坡预测:以卢旺达恩戈罗恩戈罗区为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):4147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114147.
2
Automated Landslide-Risk Prediction Using Web GIS and Machine Learning Models.基于 WebGIS 和机器学习模型的自动化滑坡风险预测
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 5;21(13):4620. doi: 10.3390/s21134620.
3
Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China.利用 SMOTE 优化机器学习方法在浙江省丽水市滑坡易发性制图中的预测能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030368.
4
Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China.中国江西瑞金滑坡易发性分区
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):5906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115906.
5
An ensemble learning-based experimental framework for smart landslide detection, monitoring, prediction, and warning in IoT-cloud environment.基于集成学习的物联网云环境下智能滑坡检测、监测、预测和预警的实验框架。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(58):122677-122699. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30683-6. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
6
Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China).随机森林模型与频率比模型在渝阳区(中国重庆)滑坡易发性制图(LSM)中的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124206.
7
Research on landslide susceptibility prediction model based on LSTM-RF-MDBN.基于 LSTM-RF-MDBN 的滑坡易发性预测模型研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(1):1504-1516. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31232-x. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
8
Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan.评估先进的随机森林和决策树算法在日本伊豆大岛火山岛降雨诱发滑坡敏感性建模中的应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 20;662:332-346. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
9
Research on machine learning forecasting and early warning model for rainfall-induced landslides in Yunnan province.云南省降雨诱发滑坡的机器学习预测与预警模型研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 18;14(1):14049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64679-0.
10
Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Machine Learning Based on Information Volume and Frequency Ratio: A Case Study of Weixin County, China.基于信息量和频率比的机器学习滑坡敏感性评价:以中国威信县为例。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;23(5):2549. doi: 10.3390/s23052549.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-hazard assessment for flood and Landslide risk in Kalimantan and Sumatra: Implications for Nusantara, Indonesia's new capital.加里曼丹和苏门答腊洪水与山体滑坡风险的多灾种评估:对印度尼西亚新首都努米亚的影响
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 11;10(18):e37789. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37789. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
2
Multi-hazard exposure mapping under climate crisis using random forest algorithm for the Kalimantan Islands, Indonesia.利用随机森林算法对印度尼西亚加里曼丹岛在气候危机下的多灾种暴露情况进行绘图。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 18;13(1):13472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40106-8.
3
Study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on rock-soil characteristic factors.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China.利用 SMOTE 优化机器学习方法在浙江省丽水市滑坡易发性制图中的预测能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030368.
2
Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model in Rwanda.卢旺达滑坡敏感性评估的空间多准则评价模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 31;15(2):243. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020243.
基于岩土特征因子的滑坡敏感性制图研究
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94936-5.