Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, China.
State Key Laboratory of Geo-hazard Prevention and Geo-environment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 20;662:332-346. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
Landslides represent a part of the cascade of geological hazards in a wide range of geo-environments. In this study, we aim to investigate and compare the performance of two state-of-the-art machine learning models, i.e., decision tree (DT) and random forest (RF) approaches to model the massive rainfall-triggered landslide occurrences in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan at a regional scale. At first, a landslide inventory map is prepared consisting of 44 landslide polygons (10,444 pixels) from aerial photo-interpretation and field surveys. To estimate the robustness of the models, we randomly adapted two different samples (S1 and S2), comprising of both positive and negative cells (70% of total landslides - 7293 pixels) for training and remaining (30%-3151 pixels) for validation. Twelve causative factors including altitude, slope angle, slope aspect, plan curvature, total curvature, compound topographic index, stream power index, distance to drainage network, drainage density, distance to geological boundaries, lithology and cumulative rainfall were selected as predictors to implement the landslide susceptibility model. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves (AUC) and other statistical signifiers were used to verify the model accuracies. The result shows that the DT and RF models achieved remarkable predictive performance (AUC > 0.9), producing near accurate susceptibility maps. The overall efficiency of RF (AUC = 0.956) is found significantly higher than the DT (AUC = 0.928) results. Additionally, we noticed that the performance of RF for modeling landslide susceptibility is very robust even though the training and validation samples are altered. Considering the performances, we suggest that both RF and DT models can be used in other similar non-eruption-related landslide studies in the tephra-deposited rich volcanoes, as they are capable of rapidly generating accurate and stable LSM maps for risk mitigation, management practices, and decision-making. Moreover, the RF-based model is promising and enough to be recommended as a method to map regional landslide susceptibility.
滑坡是广泛的地质环境中地质灾害链的一部分。在这项研究中,我们旨在研究和比较两种最先进的机器学习模型,即决策树 (DT) 和随机森林 (RF) 方法,以在区域尺度上模拟日本伊豆小笠原火山岛因大规模降雨引发的滑坡。首先,我们准备了一张滑坡目录图,该图由航空照片解释和实地调查得出的 44 个滑坡多边形(10444 个像素)组成。为了估计模型的稳健性,我们随机采用了两个不同的样本 (S1 和 S2),这两个样本都包含正样本和负样本(70%的总滑坡-7293 个像素)用于训练,其余(30%-3151 个像素)用于验证。选择了包括海拔、坡度角、坡度方向、平面曲率、总曲率、复合地形指数、水流功率指数、到水系的距离、水系密度、到地质边界的距离、岩性和累积降雨量在内的 12 个诱发因素作为预测因子来实施滑坡易发性模型。接收者操作特征 (ROC) 曲线下的面积 (AUC) 和其他统计指标用于验证模型精度。结果表明,DT 和 RF 模型具有出色的预测性能(AUC>0.9),生成了接近准确的易发性图。RF(AUC=0.956)的整体效率明显高于 DT(AUC=0.928)的结果。此外,我们注意到,即使改变了训练和验证样本,RF 对滑坡易发性建模的性能也非常稳健。考虑到性能,我们建议在其他类似的与喷发无关的火山灰堆积丰富的火山滑坡研究中,可以同时使用 RF 和 DT 模型,因为它们能够快速生成准确且稳定的 LSM 图,以用于风险缓解、管理实践和决策。此外,基于 RF 的模型很有前途,足以推荐作为绘制区域滑坡易发性图的一种方法。