Thai Anthony, Sayyid Zahra N, Hosseini Davood K, Swanson Austin, Ma Yifei, Aaron Ksenia A, Vaisbuch Yona
Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Department, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Front Neurol. 2020 May 28;11:379. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00379. eCollection 2020.
Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a treatable condition, but current diagnostic modalities have numerous limitations. Clinicians would benefit from an additional tool for diagnostic workup that is both rapid and widely available. To assess the utility of ambient pressure tympanometry (APT) in the diagnostic workup of SSCD by determining the sensitivity and specificity of APT for SSCD in comparison to other diagnostic modalities. Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent APT and temporal bone computerized tomography (CT) scans from May 2017 to July 2018. Tertiary referral center. APT was performed as part of routine audiological testing on adult patients. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who received both APT and temporal bone CT scans, and divided ears into SSCD and non-SSCD groups based on the presence or absence of radiographic SSCD. Ears with other radiographic findings that could affect tympanic membrane compliance were excluded. All patients in this study underwent APT and temporal bone CT scans. Some patients also underwent pure tone audiometry and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs). The primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and risk ratio of APT for SSCD. Secondary outcome measures include sensitivity of VEMPs and supranormal hearing thresholds. We describe 52 patients (70 ears) who underwent APT and CT imaging (mean age 47.1 years, 67.1% female). APT detected SSCD with 66.7% sensitivity and 72.1% specificity. In symptomatic patients, sensitivity was 71.4% and specificity was 75%. VEMPs performed best at detecting SSCD when defining a positive test as oVEMP amplitude >17 μV, with a sensitivity of 68.2%, similar to APT ( > 0.99). The combination of APT and VEMPs increased sensitivity to 88.9%, better than APT alone ( = 0.031) and trending toward better than VEMPs alone ( = 0.063). Rhythmic wave patterns on APT are associated with SSCD and may raise suspicion for this condition in conjunction with consistent results on other diagnostic modalities. Although clinical utility requires confirmation in a larger prospective study, APT is a simple, rapid, and widely available tool warranting further study.
上半规管裂(SSCD)是一种可治疗的疾病,但目前的诊断方法有诸多局限性。临床医生将受益于一种额外的、快速且广泛可用的诊断检查工具。通过确定与其他诊断方法相比,鼓室压力测定法(APT)对SSCD的敏感性和特异性,来评估其在SSCD诊断检查中的效用。对2017年5月至2018年7月期间接受APT和颞骨计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者进行回顾性队列研究。三级转诊中心。对成年患者进行APT作为常规听力学检查的一部分。我们回顾性分析了所有接受APT和颞骨CT扫描的患者,并根据影像学上是否存在SSCD将耳朵分为SSCD组和非SSCD组。排除有其他可能影响鼓膜顺应性的影像学表现的耳朵。本研究中的所有患者均接受了APT和颞骨CT扫描。一些患者还接受了纯音听力测定和前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMP)检查。主要结局指标为APT对SSCD的敏感性、特异性和风险比。次要结局指标包括VEMP的敏感性和听力阈值超常。我们描述了52例(70只耳朵)接受APT和CT成像的患者(平均年龄47.1岁,67.1%为女性)。APT检测SSCD的敏感性为66.7%,特异性为72.1%。在有症状的患者中,敏感性为71.4%,特异性为75%。当将oVEMP振幅>17μV定义为阳性测试时,VEMP在检测SSCD方面表现最佳,敏感性为68.2%,与APT相似(>0.99)。APT和VEMP联合使用可将敏感性提高到88.9%,优于单独使用APT(=0.031),且有优于单独使用VEMP的趋势(=0.063)。APT上的节律性波形与SSCD相关,结合其他诊断方法的一致结果可能会提高对此病的怀疑。尽管临床效用需要在更大规模的前瞻性研究中得到证实,但APT是一种简单、快速且广泛可用的工具,值得进一步研究。