Suppr超能文献

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术一期治疗对比六至八周内行ERCP后再行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的二期治疗:一项回顾性研究

Single-stage treatment with ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus two-stage treatment with ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy within six to eight weeks: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Muhammedoğlu Bahtiyar

机构信息

Clinic of General Surgery, Necip Fazil City Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Surg. 2019 May 31;35(3):178-184. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.4204. eCollection 2019 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Obstructive jaundice is one of the earliest symptoms of a hepatobiliary system disorder. The aim of the present study was to compare single stage endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and two-stage ERCP and LC with respect to the frequency of imaging, duration of anesthesia and the length of stay in our clinic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of the 350 patients undergoing ERCP between 01.01.2015 and 31.12.2016, 31 patients with single-stage ERCP and LC were assigned to Group A and 25 patients with two-stage ERCP followed by LC within 6-8 weeks were assigned to Group B. Eligibility criteria included ERCP duration, difficulty of the procedure, bile duct stones as demonstrated by imaging methods, no contraindications for LC and no suspected or known malignancy. The same surgeon performed ERCP and LC in both groups.

RESULTS

No cases of morbidity or mortality occurred in any groups. The average length of stay was 8.03 ± 4.97 days in Group A, which was significantly longer (9.92 ± 4.05 days) in Group B (p <0.026). However, the length of stay (in days) was calculated as the time from presentation to hospital until discharge and not the time elapsed after the procedure. Imaging methods were used 3.9 ± 3.07 times in Group A and significantly more frequently (5.92 ± 2.55 times) in Group B (p <0.001). Total duration of anesthesia was not statistically significantly different between the study groups (154.06 ± 53.76 min in Group A and 167.04 ± 75.17 min in Group B).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, single-stage ERCP/LC is associated with shorter hospital stay and lower frequency of imaging and can be safely used in selected cases. No cases of pancreatitis or mortality occurred following the single-stage procedure. The single-stage procedure can be safely used in selected patients with obstructive jaundice.

摘要

目的

梗阻性黄疸是肝胆系统疾病最早出现的症状之一。本研究的目的是比较一期内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)/腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与二期ERCP和LC在影像学检查频率、麻醉持续时间以及在我院住院时间方面的差异。

材料与方法

在2015年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间接受ERCP的350例患者中,31例行一期ERCP和LC的患者被分配到A组,25例行二期ERCP并在6 - 8周内进行LC的患者被分配到B组。入选标准包括ERCP持续时间、手术难度、影像学检查显示的胆管结石、无LC禁忌证以及无疑似或已知恶性肿瘤。两组的ERCP和LC均由同一位外科医生进行。

结果

两组均未发生 morbidity 或 mortality 病例。A组的平均住院时间为8.03±4.97天,B组明显更长(9.92±4.05天)(p<0.026)。然而,住院时间(以天为单位)是从入院到出院的时间,而非手术后经过的时间。A组影像学检查使用3.9±3.07次,B组明显更频繁(5.92±2.55次)(p<0.001)。研究组之间麻醉总持续时间无统计学显著差异(A组为154.06±53.76分钟,B组为167.04±75.17分钟)。

结论

总之,一期ERCP/LC与较短的住院时间和较低的影像学检查频率相关,可在选定病例中安全使用。一期手术后未发生胰腺炎或死亡病例。一期手术可在选定的梗阻性黄疸患者中安全使用。

相似文献

2
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
3
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Advantages of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in common bile duct stones.腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的优势
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018 Feb;130(3-4):100-104. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1232-9. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验