Wu Qiong, Qin Dandan, Cao Huixin, Bai Yang
Food Science and Engineering College of Changchun University, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China.
Food Science and Engineering College of Changchun University, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China.
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Nov 1;162:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.098. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
An efficient enzymatic hydrolysis method was developed and optimized for the degradation of auricularia auricula polysaccharide (AAP) and the degradation product of AAP was characterized. Cellulase was used for the degradation of AAP. The yield of reducing sugar and the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging rate were used as indices to optimize the enzymatic hydrolysis of AAP, based on response surface methodology (RSM). The resulting optimal enzymolysis conditions were as follows: enzyme dosage, 13,500 U/g; enzymolysis temperature, 50 °C; and pH, 4.2. Under these conditions, the actual yield of reducing sugar was 16.50 mg/mL and the DPPH radical scavenging rate was 87.97%. The degradation product of AAP (C-EAAP) was homogeneous and contained alpha and beta glycoside bonds, but did not contain protein or nucleic acid. The molecular weight of the degradation product was 5.94 × 10 Da. Monosaccharide composition analysis revealed that C-EAAP was composed of mannose (57.1%), glucuronic acid (10.0%), rhamnose (0.4%), glucose (22.5%), galactose (2.9%), xylose (6.0%), and fucose (1.1%). The antioxidant activity of the polysaccharide indicated that C-EAAP had better antioxidant activity than AAP. The scavenging rates of C-EAAP for hydroxyl radicals (·OH) and superoxide anion radicals (O·) were 1.65 and 1.90 times those of AAP.
开发并优化了一种高效的酶解方法用于降解黑木耳多糖(AAP),并对AAP的降解产物进行了表征。使用纤维素酶降解AAP。基于响应面法(RSM),以还原糖产量和1,1-二苯基-2-苦基肼(DPPH)自由基清除率为指标优化AAP的酶解过程。得到的最佳酶解条件如下:酶用量13500 U/g;酶解温度50℃;pH值4.2。在此条件下,还原糖的实际产量为16.50 mg/mL,DPPH自由基清除率为87.97%。AAP的降解产物(C-EAAP)具有均一性,含有α和β糖苷键,但不含蛋白质或核酸。降解产物的分子量为5.94×10 Da。单糖组成分析表明,C-EAAP由甘露糖(57.1%)、葡萄糖醛酸(10.0%)、鼠李糖(0.4%)、葡萄糖(22.5%)、半乳糖(2.9%)、木糖(6.0%)和岩藻糖(1.1%)组成。多糖的抗氧化活性表明,C-EAAP的抗氧化活性优于AAP。C-EAAP对羟基自由基(·OH)和超氧阴离子自由基(O·)的清除率分别是AAP的1.65倍和1.90倍。