• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Deep neural network analyses of spirometry for structural phenotyping of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.深度学习分析肺功能用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的结构表型分析。
JCI Insight. 2020 Jul 9;5(13):132781. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132781.
2
Airway fractal dimension predicts respiratory morbidity and mortality in COPD.气道分形维数预测 COPD 患者的呼吸发病率和死亡率。
J Clin Invest. 2018 Dec 3;128(12):5374-5382. doi: 10.1172/JCI120693. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
3
Unique and shared systemic biomarkers for emphysema in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin deficiency and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.α1-抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症和慢性阻塞性肺疾病中肺气肿的独特和共有系统性生物标志物。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Oct;84:104262. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104262. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Elevated circulating MMP-9 is linked to increased COPD exacerbation risk in SPIROMICS and COPDGene.循环 MMP-9 水平升高与 SPIROMICS 和 COPDGene 中 COPD 加重风险增加相关。
JCI Insight. 2018 Nov 15;3(22):123614. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.123614.
5
The Peak Index: Spirometry Metric for Airflow Obstruction Severity and Heterogeneity.峰值指数:气流阻塞严重度和异质性的肺量计指标。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Aug;16(8):982-989. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201811-812OC.
6
Validation of a method to assess emphysema severity by spirometry in the COPDGene study.通过 COPDGene 研究中的肺活量测定法评估肺气肿严重程度的方法验证。
Respir Res. 2020 May 1;21(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01366-4.
7
CT-derived Biomechanical Metrics Improve Agreement Between Spirometry and Emphysema.CT衍生的生物力学指标可改善肺量计与肺气肿之间的一致性。
Acad Radiol. 2016 Oct;23(10):1255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
8
Development and validation of a mortality risk prediction model for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using probabilistic graphical modelling.慢性阻塞性肺疾病死亡风险预测模型的开发与验证:一项使用概率图形模型的横断面研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Aug 22;75:102786. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102786. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Relationships between airflow obstruction and quantitative CT measurements of emphysema, air trapping, and airways in subjects with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.在有和没有慢性阻塞性肺疾病的受试者中,气流阻塞与肺气肿、空气潴留和气道的定量 CT 测量之间的关系。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep;201(3):W460-70. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10102.
10
Relative contributions of emphysema and airway remodelling to airflow limitation in COPD: Consistent results from two cohorts.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中肺气肿和气道重塑对气流受限的相对贡献:两个队列的一致结果
Respirology. 2015 May;20(4):594-601. doi: 10.1111/resp.12505. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A Few-Shot SE-Relation Net-Based Electronic Nose for Discriminating COPD.基于少样本SE关系网络的用于鉴别慢性阻塞性肺疾病的电子鼻
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 3;25(15):4780. doi: 10.3390/s25154780.
2
Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Hypoxemic Respiratory Diseases and Their Comorbidities: Molecular Insights and Diagnostic Advances in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Sleep Apnea.低氧性呼吸系统疾病及其合并症中的氧化应激与炎症:慢性阻塞性肺疾病和睡眠呼吸暂停的分子见解与诊断进展
Antioxidants (Basel). 2025 Jul 8;14(7):839. doi: 10.3390/antiox14070839.
3
Deep Learning of Suboptimal Spirometry to Predict Respiratory Outcomes and Mortality.次优肺活量测定法的深度学习以预测呼吸结局和死亡率
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 30:rs.3.rs-6296752. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6296752/v1.
4
Deep Learning-Based Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation Prediction Using Flow-Volume and Volume-Time Curve Imaging: Retrospective Cohort Study.基于深度学习的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重预测:使用流量-容积和容积-时间曲线成像的回顾性队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 15;27:e69785. doi: 10.2196/69785.
5
Pathways to chronic disease detection and prediction: Mapping the potential of machine learning to the pathophysiological processes while navigating ethical challenges.慢性病检测与预测的途径:在应对伦理挑战的同时,将机器学习的潜力与病理生理过程相对应。
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2024 Jun 9;11(1):1-21. doi: 10.1002/cdt3.137. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Discordant definitions of small airway dysfunction between spirometry and parametric response mapping: the HRCT-based study.肺量计与参数反应映射法对小气道功能障碍的不一致定义:基于高分辨率计算机断层扫描的研究
Insights Imaging. 2024 Oct 2;15(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01819-0.
7
Differential Association of COPD Subtypes With Cardiovascular Events and COPD Exacerbations.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)亚型与心血管事件及COPD急性加重的差异关联
Chest. 2024 Dec;166(6):1360-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.148. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
8
Curve-Modelling and Machine Learning for a Better COPD Diagnosis.曲线建模和机器学习助力慢阻肺的精准诊断
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jun 12;19:1333-1343. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S456390. eCollection 2024.
9
Deep learning parametric response mapping from inspiratory chest CT scans: a new approach for small airway disease screening.深度学习参数响应映射吸气胸部 CT 扫描:一种新的小气道疾病筛查方法。
Respir Res. 2023 Nov 28;24(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02611-2.
10
The Challenges of Spirometric Diagnosis of COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺功能诊断的挑战。
Can Respir J. 2023 Sep 29;2023:6991493. doi: 10.1155/2023/6991493. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Should Health Care Demand Interpretable Artificial Intelligence or Accept "Black Box" Medicine?医疗保健应该要求可解释的人工智能还是接受“黑箱”医学?
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):59-60. doi: 10.7326/M19-2548. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
2
Discriminative Accuracy of FEV1:FVC Thresholds for COPD-Related Hospitalization and Mortality.FEV1:FVC 阈值对 COPD 相关住院和死亡的鉴别准确性。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2438-2447. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7233.
3
The Peak Index: Spirometry Metric for Airflow Obstruction Severity and Heterogeneity.峰值指数:气流阻塞严重度和异质性的肺量计指标。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Aug;16(8):982-989. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201811-812OC.
4
Deep Learning in Medicine-Promise, Progress, and Challenges.医学中的深度学习——前景、进展与挑战
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):293-294. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7117.
5
New Spirometry Indices for Detecting Mild Airflow Obstruction.新的肺功能指标用于检测轻度气流阻塞。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 30;8(1):17484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35930-2.
6
Imaging Advances in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Insights from the Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPDGene) Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的影像学进展。来自慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPDGene)研究的遗传流行病学的见解。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb 1;199(3):286-301. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1351SO.
7
Airway fractal dimension predicts respiratory morbidity and mortality in COPD.气道分形维数预测 COPD 患者的呼吸发病率和死亡率。
J Clin Invest. 2018 Dec 3;128(12):5374-5382. doi: 10.1172/JCI120693. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
8
Small airways disease in mild and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study.轻度和中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的小气道疾病:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Aug;6(8):591-602. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30196-6. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Among US States.《1990 - 2016年美国健康状况:美国各州的疾病、伤害及风险因素负担》
JAMA. 2018 Apr 10;319(14):1444-1472. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0158.
10
Association between Emphysema and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Outcomes in the COPDGene and SPIROMICS Cohorts: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Clinical Trials.慢性阻塞性肺疾病基因(COPDGene)和肺影像与肺生理学评估研究(SPIROMICS)队列中肺气肿与慢性阻塞性肺疾病预后的关联:两项临床试验的事后分析
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul 15;198(2):265-267. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201801-0051LE.

深度学习分析肺功能用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的结构表型分析。

Deep neural network analyses of spirometry for structural phenotyping of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

机构信息

UAB Lung Imaging Core.

UAB Lung Health Center.

出版信息

JCI Insight. 2020 Jul 9;5(13):132781. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132781.

DOI:10.1172/jci.insight.132781
PMID:32554922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7406302/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDCurrently recommended traditional spirometry outputs do not reflect the relative contributions of emphysema and airway disease to airflow obstruction. We hypothesized that machine-learning algorithms can be trained on spirometry data to identify these structural phenotypes.METHODSParticipants enrolled in a large multicenter study (COPDGene) were included. The data points from expiratory flow-volume curves were trained using a deep-learning model to predict structural phenotypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on CT, and results were compared with traditional spirometry metrics and an optimized random forest classifier. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and weighted F-score were used to measure the discriminative accuracy of a fully convolutional neural network, random forest, and traditional spirometry metrics to phenotype CT as normal, emphysema-predominant (>5% emphysema), airway-predominant (Pi10 > median), and mixed phenotypes. Similar comparisons were made for the detection of functional small airway disease phenotype (>20% on parametric response mapping).RESULTSAmong 8980 individuals, the neural network was more accurate in discriminating predominant emphysema/airway phenotypes (AUC 0.80, 95%CI 0.79-0.81) compared with traditional measures of spirometry, FEV1/FVC (AUC 0.71, 95%CI 0.69-0.71), FEV1% predicted (AUC 0.70, 95%CI 0.68-0.71), and random forest classifier (AUC 0.78, 95%CI 0.77-0.79). The neural network was also more accurate in discriminating predominant emphysema/small airway phenotypes (AUC 0.91, 95%CI 0.90-0.92) compared with FEV1/FVC (AUC 0.80, 95%CI 0.78-0.82), FEV1% predicted (AUC 0.83, 95%CI 0.80-0.84), and with comparable accuracy with random forest classifier (AUC 0.90, 95%CI 0.88-0.91).CONCLUSIONSStructural phenotypes of COPD can be identified from spirometry using deep-learning and machine-learning approaches, demonstrating their potential to identify individuals for targeted therapies.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT00608764.FUNDINGThis study was supported by NIH grants K23 HL133438 and R21EB027891 and an American Thoracic Foundation 2018 Unrestricted Research Grant. The COPDGene study is supported by NIH grants NHLBI U01 HL089897 and U01 HL089856. The COPDGene study (NCT00608764) is also supported by the COPD Foundation through contributions made to an Industry Advisory Committee comprising AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sunovion.

摘要

背景

目前推荐的传统肺量计检测结果不能反映肺气肿和气道疾病对气流阻塞的相对贡献。我们假设机器学习算法可以通过肺量计数据进行训练,以识别这些结构性表型。

方法

纳入了一项大型多中心研究(COPDGene)的参与者。使用深度学习模型对呼气流量-容积曲线的数据点进行训练,以预测 CT 上的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)结构性表型,并将结果与传统肺量计指标和优化的随机森林分类器进行比较。接受者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)和加权 F 分数用于衡量全卷积神经网络、随机森林和传统肺量计指标对 CT 正常、肺气肿占优势(>5%肺气肿)、气道占优势(Pi10>中位数)和混合表型的区分准确性。还对功能性小气道疾病表型(参数反应映射>20%)的检测进行了类似的比较。

结果

在 8980 名个体中,神经网络在区分主要肺气肿/气道表型方面比传统的肺量计指标(FEV1/FVC、FEV1%预测值)更准确,AUC 分别为 0.80(95%CI 0.79-0.81)、0.71(95%CI 0.69-0.71)、0.70(95%CI 0.68-0.71)和随机森林分类器(AUC 0.78,95%CI 0.77-0.79)。神经网络在区分主要肺气肿/小气道表型方面也更准确,AUC 为 0.91(95%CI 0.90-0.92),与 FEV1/FVC(AUC 0.80,95%CI 0.78-0.82)、FEV1%预测值(AUC 0.83,95%CI 0.80-0.84)相当,与随机森林分类器的准确性相当(AUC 0.90,95%CI 0.88-0.91)。

结论

使用深度学习和机器学习方法可以从肺量计中识别 COPD 的结构性表型,这表明它们有可能识别出需要靶向治疗的个体。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00608764。

资金

本研究由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)K23HL133438 和 R21HL133438 以及美国胸科学会 2018 年不受限制的研究赠款资助。COPDGene 研究由 NIH 授予 NHLBI U01HL089897 和 U01HL089856 资助。COPDGene 研究(NCT00608764)还得到了 COPD 基金会的支持,该基金会通过向由阿斯利康、勃林格殷格翰、葛兰素史克、诺华和山德士组成的行业咨询委员会做出贡献来提供支持。