Lori Uscher-Pines, Bouskill Kathryn E, Jessica Sousa, Mimi Shen, Shira H Fischer
Rand Health Q. 2020 Jun 15;8(4). eCollection 2020 Jun.
Despite telehealth's potential to improve access to care, it is underutilized by safety-net providers, including Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), due to a range of policy, organizational, and logistical barriers. Research that facilitates state-to-state learning can inform both Medicaid and Medicare policies going forward and provide lessons learned for FQHCs interested in starting or expanding telehealth programs. The authors conducted telephone discussions with representatives of seven state Medicaid programs and 19 urban and rural FQHCs to address how FQHCs in selected states are using telehealth, how the delivery of telehealth services is structured, barriers and facilitators of telehealth, and how Medicaid policy influences telehealth implementation. Live video telehealth, typically telebehavioral health, was the most prevalent type of telehealth among FQHCs in the sample. Stakeholders highlighted several weaknesses of Medicaid policies in one or more states, including general lack of clarity regarding which services were allowed by Medicaid programs, ambiguity around telepresenter requirements, lack of authorization for FQHCs to serve as distant sites in the federal Medicare program and in select state Medicaid programs, and insufficient reimbursement. FQHC stakeholders also identified multiple barriers to telehealth implementation beyond reimbursement. Nonetheless, FQHC stakeholders generally believed they could overcome these various barriers to telehealth implementation, if reimbursement and the risk of losing revenue in offering telehealth services were improved. While diversity of experiences makes it difficult to generalize about implementation of telehealth in the safety net, the authors identified several common themes and associated considerations for policymakers, payers, and FQHCs.
尽管远程医疗有改善医疗服务可及性的潜力,但包括联邦合格健康中心(FQHCs)在内的安全网提供者对其利用不足,原因是存在一系列政策、组织和后勤方面的障碍。促进州际间学习的研究可为未来的医疗补助和医疗保险政策提供参考,并为有意启动或扩大远程医疗项目的FQHCs提供经验教训。作者与七个州医疗补助项目的代表以及19个城乡FQHCs进行了电话讨论,以探讨选定州的FQHCs如何使用远程医疗、远程医疗服务的提供结构、远程医疗的障碍和促进因素,以及医疗补助政策如何影响远程医疗的实施。实时视频远程医疗,通常是远程行为健康,是样本中FQHCs最普遍的远程医疗类型。利益相关者强调了一个或多个州医疗补助政策的几个弱点,包括医疗补助项目允许哪些服务普遍缺乏明确性、远程会诊人员要求不明确、FQHCs在联邦医疗保险项目和某些州医疗补助项目中作为远程站点提供服务缺乏授权,以及报销不足。FQHCs的利益相关者还指出了除报销之外远程医疗实施的多个障碍。尽管如此,FQHCs的利益相关者普遍认为,如果报销以及提供远程医疗服务时失去收入的风险得到改善,他们可以克服远程医疗实施中的各种障碍。虽然经验的多样性使得难以对安全网中远程医疗的实施进行概括,但作者为政策制定者、支付方和FQHCs确定了几个共同主题及相关考虑因素。